Re: [CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-06 Thread Michael Simpson
On 6/5/08, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott Silva wrote:

  on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following:
  
   i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is
   done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not
   professionally recommend centos either privately,personally, or in the
   realm of a business. thanks for seeing my side of the issue and not
   jumping on the elite bandwagon. i am done.
 
  No wonder you were banned on #irc. I personally am more than happy to
  wait. I came here from Whitebox linux, and it is even slower there. One
  person is doing what the entire team is doing here. I also know that if
  I am in that big of a hurry, I can down the src rpms and start
  building... But I won't.
 
  Johnny, Karanbir, Russ, Seth, Dag, Jim, Donavan, and every one else on
  the team that I most surely missed... You do a bang up job, and our
  thanks go to your tireless and mostly unpaid contributions to this
  project! If I have to wait a week or a month for a new release... so
  be it. The security updates are what is most important, and those come
  very quickly.

 I second that!


I totally agree

I am the sysadmin for a *very* small company which we operate in the
free time outside of our normal jobs as addiction medics. Our profit
levels are so low that we cannot justify a RH support contract
*because* CentOS exists.

Of all the *many* mailing-lists that i am on i find the CentOS (and
the linux-poweredge list from Dell) to be the most polite and
informative.

If i ever get to deploy my parachute and exit the NHS then i am really
looking forward to lurking on the irc chans as well (pesky NHS
firewall and aup).

Our production server will be installed into NHS Lothian's network
once 5.2 comes out and i am *more* than happy with the It'll be done
when it's done answer.

Thanks again for all the work that you guys do!

mike
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Scott Silva

on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following:


On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:

James Bunnell wrote:
 I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
 CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
 5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then
 told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. I then asked if there was a
 way to get a progress report somehow on 5.2, and that 5.2 has already
 upgraded that kernel. The result was that I was banned for being
 correct. I dont understand this kind of support.

You are NOT correct ...

The latest NON 5.2 kernel is:

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.src.rpm

looks like -53 to me


The latest 5.2 kernel is:

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.src.rpm

this is a new kernel as of today, may 22 compilation date


As far as being banned on an IRC Channel ... I am sure you were warned 
first.  CentOS is manned by volunteers.  If you want to argue with the 
people who are on IRC after they tell you not to, then you will be banned.
yes i was warned, however, can they not admit when they are wrong? and 
because its volunteers (like debian), all the more reason to be 
professional.


The CentOS project trusts the judgment of our forum moderators and our 
IRC ops ... if they ban you then you are banned.  We are not a for 
profit company where you pay us for service and can be disrespectful to 
our employees.  You will instead have to be polite in your disagreements.
i have been polite for weeks. i finally had a enough of being polite and 
just being told, 'it will be release when its ready.' that is not a 
professional answer. is it too much to ask for an update?


If this is a problem, I suggest that you find a paid for service 
contract where you can be rude to the people with whom you interact.
i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is 
done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not 
professionally recommend centos either privately,personally, or in the 
realm of a business. thanks for seeing my side of the issue and not 
jumping on the elite bandwagon. i am done.


No wonder you were banned on #irc.
I personally am more than happy to wait. I came here from Whitebox linux, and 
it is even slower there. One person is doing what the entire team is doing here.
I also know that if I am in that big of a hurry, I can down the src rpms and 
start building... But I won't.


Johnny, Karanbir, Russ, Seth, Dag, Jim, Donavan, and every one else on the 
team that I most surely missed... You do a bang up job, and our thanks go to 
your tireless and mostly unpaid contributions to this project!
 If I have to wait a week or a month for a new release... so be it. The 
security updates are what is most important, and those come very quickly.


Again ... Thank you all!

--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Tom Diehl

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, James Bunnell wrote:



On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:


James Bunnell wrote:

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:

On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks.  Did you really need an
update on that?


i only asked. an answer such as what was given here earlier would have
sufficed. is that so hard?


But it is the same answer you already had!


ok, let's look at this differently. if i were looking for a answer to
these things from a standpoint of wanting to help, or pointing out
something that may be perceived differently somewhere else such as the
'well they are updating 3-4, why not 5'...how is that to be construed? i
think that deserves more than an aggressive response such as what
happened on irc.


Not for nothin but I thought about 200 messages ago you said you were done?

PLEASE do not answer that. Silence would be the best answer.

Regards,

--
Tom Diehl   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Spamtrap address [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Scott Silva wrote:

 on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following:
  
  i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is 
  done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not 
  professionally recommend centos either privately,personally, or in the 
  realm of a business. thanks for seeing my side of the issue and not 
  jumping on the elite bandwagon. i am done.
 
 No wonder you were banned on #irc. I personally am more than happy to
 wait. I came here from Whitebox linux, and it is even slower there. One
 person is doing what the entire team is doing here. I also know that if
 I am in that big of a hurry, I can down the src rpms and start
 building... But I won't.
 
 Johnny, Karanbir, Russ, Seth, Dag, Jim, Donavan, and every one else on
 the team that I most surely missed... You do a bang up job, and our
 thanks go to your tireless and mostly unpaid contributions to this
 project! If I have to wait a week or a month for a new release... so 
 be it. The security updates are what is most important, and those come 
 very quickly.

I second that!

Besides I am in no hurry to start the whole change management process
again.

Feels like I just finished upgrading to 5.1 ... Oh wait, I did!

-Ross

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos