RE: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Mike Peterson
At my site we use LoneTar from Cactus International http://www.cactus.com/.
It is commercial and does offer a trial to try it first also.
 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Thorpe
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:49 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Tape operation


I found Amanda rather complex for what we wanted to do (simple backup of a
single server to a single tape drive).

We eventually decided on BRU (www.tolisgroup.com). It's not free, but the
simple 'workstation' version isn't very expensive.
Their support staff are really helpful as well. Free download for trial if
you wish.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 15 May 2008 15:57, Dennis McLeod wrote:
> Spans tapes just fine (Manual changes...). I looked at amanda at the time,
> but there was some issues with Tape spanning, if I recall.

Tape spanning arrived in amanda about two years ago.

Anne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Ray Leventhal

Martyn Drake wrote:


Arkeia (at least when I last used it several years ago) was pretty much all
point-and-click.

Regards,

Martyn
  
And therein lies one of the downfalls of Arkeia.  Its ease of use 
requires X.  I don't generally enable X on servers, but as this 
particular network is entirely off-internet, there was no compelling 
reason to go CLI only.


-Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Martyn Drake
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Anne Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Not so.  Take a look at Amanda.  Runs under linux, can handle backup for whole
> network (multiple domains, too, I think) and is utterly reliable.  It can
> backup to disk, tape or whatever.

I third the Amanda vote.  But also Arkeia is pretty good too.  Amanda
isn't that difficult to get one's head around, and Arkeia (at least
when I last used it several years ago) was pretty much all
point-and-click.

Regards,

Martyn
-- 
Martyn Drake
http://www.drake.org.uk
http://www.mindthegapps.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Dennis McLeod


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:34 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Tape operation
> 
> Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > My only encounter with tape-backup was with Windows 2000. With it, 
> > when we backup things using windows' backup tool, it will create a 
> > 'catalog', then the catalog contains all the backup 
> operations we do 
> > based on date. So, with this we can "append" many backups into one 
> > tape. Next time we want to restore a backup, we can choose 
> what date available in that particular tape.
> >
> > I have zero experience with tape on Linux. I've been 
> googling around 
> > and it seems that the backup operation is very different.
> >
> > For example:
> > - The tape is 400GB (LTO-3)
> > - The data is only 10GB
> >
> > Some of the articles I read imply that 1 tape contains 1 
> backup-file only. 
> > CMIIW. This is certainly not very efficient. The commands used are: 
> > mt, either tar, cpio.
> > ...
> 
> I recommend buying some commercial tape backup software..   
> freeware for 
> tape is woefully poor.
> 
> common packages include...
> 
> Legato (from EMC)
> Symantec Backup Exec and its big brother NetBackup
> Tivoli StorageManager (from IBM)
> HP DataProtector Express (hoary, but quite robust and 
> cheaper than the above)
> 
> 
> and there's a bunch of smaller players, like NovaStor, Yosemite, etc
> 
> the big ugly with all of these is the tape formats and catalogs are 
> generally NOT interchangable.
> 
> btw, I would think twice about keeping 40 daily backups on the same 
> tape, thats a lot of eggs in one basket. LTO /is/ quite reliable, 
> but still...
> 
>


I use Bacula on Centos 5.1.
It's a dedicated backup server. P4-1.8/512m/36G drive/DDS4 tape drive.
Backs up local files (backup catalogs, etc...) and network files just fine.
Using DDS-4. It will control Autoloaders, according to the docs, but I don't
have one yet.
Spans tapes just fine (Manual changes...). I looked at amanda at the time,
but there was some issues with Tape spanning, if I recall. 
I force it to my schedule, (full on Wednesday, diffs the rest of the week,
new Volume each week.) but it's perfectly capable of taking care of itself
once you set it up.
I haven't used a Windows backup program in years, but Bacula is at least as
capable as Backup Exec was last time I used it. 2003~ish, with an Exabyte
LTO-2 library.
Will back up windows Clients too, but I'm not doing that. I'm backing up
files to a Samba Server, and that's what goes on tape.
One thing I notice about Amanda/Zmanda, is they are now touting the ability
to backup to Amazon's S3
I would have pursued it more at the time, if it was an option then.
You can use BAT, Bacula console and the Gnome Bacula monitor in a GUI, if
you want, or use the CLI

I can't justify spending money for backup software, when Bacula and Amanda
work as well as they do.

Dennis


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Ray Leventhal

Kevin Thorpe wrote:
I found Amanda rather complex for what we wanted to do (simple backup 
of a single server to a single tape drive).


We eventually decided on BRU (www.tolisgroup.com). It's not free, but 
the simple 'workstation' version isn't very expensive.
Their support staff are really helpful as well. Free download for 
trial if you wish.
Another commercial package which I've been *very* happy with is Arkeia. 
Not too costly (I'm on a legacy version, 5.3 - the Network Backup (ANB))
and I've been extremely happy.  In fact, it was put to a real world test 
recently when one of my servers died hardand it passed with flying 
colors.  Easy setup (rpm) and fast reindex and restores got up and 
running quickly.


Just my .02.
YMMV,
-Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Kevin Thorpe
I found Amanda rather complex for what we wanted to do (simple backup of 
a single server to a single tape drive).


We eventually decided on BRU (www.tolisgroup.com). It's not free, but 
the simple 'workstation' version isn't very expensive.
Their support staff are really helpful as well. Free download for trial 
if you wish.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Terry Polzin
On Thursday May 15 2008, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 15 May 2008 07:34, John R Pierce wrote:
> > I recommend buying some commercial tape backup software..   freeware for
> > tape is woefully poor.
>
> Not so.  Take a look at Amanda.  Runs under linux, can handle backup for
> whole network (multiple domains, too, I think) and is utterly reliable.  It
> can backup to disk, tape or whatever.
>
> Anne
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I second the AMANDA recommendation if you are on a budget


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 15 May 2008 07:34, John R Pierce wrote:
> I recommend buying some commercial tape backup software..   freeware for
> tape is woefully poor.

Not so.  Take a look at Amanda.  Runs under linux, can handle backup for whole 
network (multiple domains, too, I think) and is utterly reliable.  It can 
backup to disk, tape or whatever.

Anne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-14 Thread John R Pierce

Fajar Priyanto wrote:

Hi all,
My only encounter with tape-backup was with Windows 2000. With it, when we 
backup things using windows' backup tool, it will create a 'catalog', then 
the catalog contains all the backup operations we do based on date. So, with 
this we can "append" many backups into one tape. Next time we want to restore 
a backup, we can choose what date available in that particular tape.


I have zero experience with tape on Linux. I've been googling around and it 
seems that the backup operation is very different.


For example:
- The tape is 400GB (LTO-3)
- The data is only 10GB

Some of the articles I read imply that 1 tape contains 1 backup-file only. 
CMIIW. This is certainly not very efficient. The commands used are: mt, 
either tar, cpio.

...


I recommend buying some commercial tape backup software..   freeware for 
tape is woefully poor.


common packages include...

   Legato (from EMC)
   Symantec Backup Exec and its big brother NetBackup
   Tivoli StorageManager (from IBM)
   HP DataProtector Express (hoary, but quite robust and cheaper than 
the above)



and there's a bunch of smaller players, like NovaStor, Yosemite, etc

the big ugly with all of these is the tape formats and catalogs are 
generally NOT interchangable.


btw, I would think twice about keeping 40 daily backups on the same 
tape, thats a lot of eggs in one basket. LTO /is/ quite reliable, 
but still...





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Tape operation

2008-05-14 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi all,
My only encounter with tape-backup was with Windows 2000. With it, when we 
backup things using windows' backup tool, it will create a 'catalog', then 
the catalog contains all the backup operations we do based on date. So, with 
this we can "append" many backups into one tape. Next time we want to restore 
a backup, we can choose what date available in that particular tape.

I have zero experience with tape on Linux. I've been googling around and it 
seems that the backup operation is very different.

For example:
- The tape is 400GB (LTO-3)
- The data is only 10GB

Some of the articles I read imply that 1 tape contains 1 backup-file only. 
CMIIW. This is certainly not very efficient. The commands used are: mt, 
either tar, cpio.

My question is:
1. How do I use that one tape of 400GB to store 39 archives of backup into it 
in Linux?
2. Is tape backup seen by Linux just like any other filesystem? Can we mount 
it and 'ls -l' it?
3. When to rewind, forward, why?
4. Wel will only backup data/files (not the entire filesystem), is it enough 
to use the software provided by the tape vendor, or do I need another 
software? Or just the mt command will do it?

Any URL, scripts, insight are very welcome. 
Thank you very much.
-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial 
http://linux2.arinet.org
11:35:28 up 4:39, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux 
Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos