Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-20 Thread Michael Clark

At 8:46 AM -0400 5/20/08, Ray Leventhal wrote:

Ray Van Dolson wrote:

So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
days?  Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
there?



I compared several different web stat tools (Analog, AWStats, 
PWebStats, Visitors, Webalizer and W3Perl) last January. 
http://www.planetmike.com/goto/661/



--

Michael Clark
http://www.PlanetMike.com

Listen to Christmas music 24 hours a day 7 days a week:
http://www.ChristmasMusic247.com

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
 - Martin Luther King Jr.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-20 Thread Ray Leventhal

Ray Van Dolson wrote:

So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
days?  Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
there?

Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

  
I've been happy with awstats, but usually give my clients wusage[1] as 
well.  Downside is that wusage isn't free anymore, but does have some 
decent pricing for unlimited domains (under US$300 last time I checked).


HTH,
-Ray
[1] http://www.boutell.com/wusage/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-20 Thread Seán O Sullivan
On Mon, 19 May 2008 21:43:12 -0700
Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
> days?  Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
> there?

Analog (http://www.analog.cx/).
Very fast, and accurate - big downside is that it takes a fair bit of
time to customise it.


Seán


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
> days?  Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
> there?

I'm a fan of awstats, simply because I can consolidate all my service
logs with geo_ip data and produce the shiny graphs that make my boss
happy.


-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-19 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner

Ray Van Dolson wrote:

So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
days?  Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
there?

Ray

   Awffull - http://www.stedee.id.au/awffull

--
H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.
 +
 Ashley M. Kirchner    .   303.442.6410 x130
 IT Director / SysAdmin / Websmith . 800.441.3873 x130
 Photo Craft Imaging   . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
 http://www.pcraft.com . .  ..   Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A. 


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-19 Thread Ray Van Dolson
So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these
days?  Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out
there?

Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos