Re: [CentOS] bind update flubbed somehow? (resolved)
On 06/06/2017 15:07, Jason Welsh wrote: ugh, the upgrade changed the owner from named to root on /var/named where my zone files are and therefore named could not read the zone files.. How embarrassing.. ;) Jason That will happen every time named is restarted (it is part of the start up script) move your zones to something like /var/named/master/ or /var/named/slave depending. Tris * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify postmas...@bgfl.org The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation * ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bind update flubbed somehow? (resolved)
ugh, the upgrade changed the owner from named to root on /var/named where my zone files are and therefore named could not read the zone files.. How embarrassing.. ;) Jason On 06/06/2017 09:58 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Tuesday, June 06, 2017 10:53 AM -0400 Jason Welsh wrote: [root@bind1 /var/named]$nslookup -port=5353 servername 10.115.76.87 nslookup is deprecated. What does dig say? It's much more informative and shows all the details of the query and reply packets. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
