[CentOS] how can we help? was: Re: The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

2011-03-23 Thread cornel panceac
2011/3/23 R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com

  This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
 'doing' rather than
 talking in the cloister

 as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
became harder. so i believe the real question is: how can we help the CentOS
project? how can we unload the developers so that they do more high level
and/or creative things with less work?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] how can we help? was: Re: The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

2011-03-23 Thread R P Herrold
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, cornel panceac wrote:

 2011/3/23 R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com

  This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
 'doing' rather than
 talking in the cloister

 as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
 became harder.

ehhh?  It has not gotten materially harder to build, if indeed 
it has gotten harder at all.  4.9 sailed out (thanks, Johnny 
-- also there was no new ISO set and anaconda to spin); 5.6 
has some niggles which are being worked out in QA; and my 
trial building of the 6 sources, INCLUDING A RE-WRITE of my 
local autobuilder, took less than a week, for getting the 
first pass done.  I am not happy with the package build 
scheduler (it is too naiive and not as efficient as I would 
like it)

That said, I then rebuilt those sources 3 more rounds, to make 
sure they are self-hosting and stabilized, BEFORE turning to 
address trademark and branding issues.  If a person were 
inclined to see the process and get a flavor for doing rounds 
of rebuilding to ensure convergance, rebuild gcc, or glicb 
from an unpacked tarball, with the minimal shell tools 
building environment for 'bootstrapping' into a new 
environment

 so i believe the real question is: how can we help the 
 CentOS project? how can we unload the developers so that 
 they do more high level and/or creative things with less 
 work?

I am substantially certain the archive of this list or the 
-devel list contains suggesting identifying trade-marks that 
leaked out of 'redhat-logos', and branding changes not 
affirmatively required by the 'elide other's trademarks' 
requirement; large numbers of bugs are never touched and 
confirmed as reproduceable, or still viable; pushing fixes 
upstream [we had an email inquiry today, wanting to help 
extend CentOS to add a new national language that will not 
occur here, but is a perfectly reasonable translation project 
to push into Fedora so it eventually flows down here ... ]

It is perfectly reasonable to 'toil in the vinyards' of Fedora 
to cause future CentOS versions to benefit from the effort

-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos