Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-23 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael Klinosky
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 5:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
Do the repositories have decoders and such?

For that stuff, I think rpmforge is a good place to start.

http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/FAQ.php#B2

HTH.
-- 
/Sorin


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-23 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Robert Heller
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 5:41 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

 What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
 Do the repositories have decoders and such?

Adobe has a repository for Linux RPMs (acrobat reader, flash player,
etc.).

What software from Adobe does actually work with CentOS and/or linux in
general except for Adobe Reader and Flash-player? I've tried installing
Shockwave-player, but it's not supported.
-- 
/Sorin


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-23 Thread Robert Heller
At Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:39:40 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 
wrote:

 
 Content-Language: sv
 
 
 ---Executing: recode
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf
 Of Robert Heller
 Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 5:41 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Cc: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions
 
  What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
  Do the repositories have decoders and such?
 
 Adobe has a repository for Linux RPMs (acrobat reader, flash player,
 etc.).
 
 What software from Adobe does actually work with CentOS and/or linux in
 general except for Adobe Reader and Flash-player? I've tried installing
 Shockwave-player, but it's not supported.

Flash Player and Adobe Reader are the main things.  There might be some
other (small) support packages.  Who knows, Adobe might add
additionional odds and ends someday...


-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
   
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Ned Slider
Michael Klinosky wrote:
 Hello.
 I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
 like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
 latest  greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.
 

A lot of desktop users come to CentOS for exactly that reason. Stability 
and long term support are two of the core fundamentals of an enterprise 
class distro.

 But, I have some questions. I found 2 centos websites (primary and 
 wiki), and checked the forum - but couldn't find answers to these concerns.
 
 Is CentOS basically like Fedora? (Well, except for the updates every 6
 months!) As in 'look  feel', underlying operations, etc. (Btw, I know 
 about removing upstream branding.)
 

RHEL 5, and hence CentOS 5, was based off a snapshot around the time of 
Fedora 6 so if you're familiar with FC6 then you'll feel right at home 
with CentOS.

 Any caveats? Meaning, does it use the same repositories that Fedora
 does? Are there any major or significant differences?
 

Best see the Wiki for that:

http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/

Be careful which 3rd party repos you use and always enable/use the 
priorities plugin.

 I should just go for the most recent package (5.2) - yes? About how old 
 are the apps? (A few months?)
 

Yes. That depends - some are 2 years old (around the time of FC6 and the 
release) whereas others have been/are updated (eg, Firefox, OpenOffice, 
Thunderbird).

 How are application updates handled? 5.2 has firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5. 
 I saw (on the Firefox website) that 3.0.6 is out. Will an app update get 
 that version, or something just a bit older? (btw, I know about 
 backporting.)
 

Upstream normally doesn't change the version of apps in the release, but 
this time around they did update Firefox from 1.5 to 3.0. Presumably 
they felt it was easier to maintain than to backport fixes into 1.5. 
Generally, Other than a few selected desktop apps, most stuff will stay 
at the same version and have fixes backported. It's actually pretty easy 
to just update stuff like Firefox/Thunderbird and OpenOffice straight 
from their websites if you do need the very latest versions of these.

 Does centos use Plymouth? I have a somewhat recent computer (about 3 
 years old) that has an intel chipset (which Plymouth can't handle yet, 
 and so it needs xdriver=vesa during install).
 

No, no Plymouth in CentOS 5 and there never will be. Funny, you're not 
the first Fedora user I've heard complain about lack of support in 
Plymouth :-P




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Michael Klinosky
Michael A. Peters wrote:
 5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in 
 awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0

http://centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Package_Manifest/ar01s03.html
states 'firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5'.
Are you saying that yum will bump it to at least 3.0.5?

 RHEL made an exception w/ FireFox and updates - and it was justifiable.

I can agree with that! I see that they jumped over version 2 entirely.

**

It sounds nice so far. Ned stated that there's a mix of vintages (some 
mature, others are quite new).

And, I'll certainly check the LiveCD (I've used Fedora's).

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread William L. Maltby

On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 07:02 -0500, Michael Klinosky wrote:
 Michael A. Peters wrote:
  5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in 
  awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0
 
 http://centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Package_Manifest/ar01s03.html
 states 'firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5'.
 Are you saying that yum will bump it to at least 3.0.5?

Box stock 5.0 originally, fully updated with nothing more than yum.

$ yum list firefox
Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror,
  : fedorakmod, kernel-module, priorities, tsflags,
versionlock
Reading version lock configuration
413 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
firefox.i386 3.0.6-1.el5.centos installed
$

 snip

-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Michael Klinosky
What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)? 
Do the repositories have decoders and such?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
 I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
 like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
 latest  greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.
snip
I want to add several things, to the previous (and excellent) replies.
(a) This is an Enterprise Distro, lacking  a lot of Multimedia
Applications you might have had in FC. Follow this page on the CentOS
Wiki:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS
(b) Install the Priorities Plug in and verify that it works, before
you use any 3rd party yum repositories
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
(c) Instll the FastestMirror Plug In
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/FastestMirror
This is a super mailing list, with extremely helpful people, including
the Developers participating. Welcome!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
 What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
 Do the repositories have decoders and such?
Hmmm. I answered your question about Multimedia, before I read it.
:-)   I am listening on  Streamaudio.com to KEAG-FM in Anchorage,
using the mplayer plugin for Mozilla Firefox as I write this.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
 What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)?
 Do the repositories have decoders and such?

Follow on: You can get Google's Picasa for Linux. My wife uses it on
M$ Windows. I had her help me with it one day and she had no idea she
wasn't using Picasa on Windows. She said it is the same.  The only
thing I haven't gotten to work yet (I need to return to that problem
and spend time with it until I solve it!) is microphone output, when
using Skype on Linux. That's apparently a setting somewhere in Linux.
Many others on this list have Skype on Linux running properly. I also
have Google Earth running on Linux. Works well. Recently, we got a
Digital Camcorder. The kino video editor is quite easy to use. There
is another one that has a long learning curve, but it is extremely
powerful: cinelerraHTH
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-21 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:01:58 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 
wrote:

 
 What is the situation with multi-media additions (e.g. SWflash, mpeg)? 
 Do the repositories have decoders and such?

Adobe has a repository for Linux RPMs (acrobat reader, flash player,
etc.).

mplayer is in the RPMForge repository.

lame  related packages (MP3) are in the RPMForge repository.

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 


-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-20 Thread Michael Klinosky
Hello.
I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't
like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the
latest  greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing.

But, I have some questions. I found 2 centos websites (primary and 
wiki), and checked the forum - but couldn't find answers to these concerns.

Is CentOS basically like Fedora? (Well, except for the updates every 6
months!) As in 'look  feel', underlying operations, etc. (Btw, I know 
about removing upstream branding.)

Any caveats? Meaning, does it use the same repositories that Fedora
does? Are there any major or significant differences?

I should just go for the most recent package (5.2) - yes? About how old 
are the apps? (A few months?)

How are application updates handled? 5.2 has firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5. 
I saw (on the Firefox website) that 3.0.6 is out. Will an app update get 
that version, or something just a bit older? (btw, I know about 
backporting.)

Does centos use Plymouth? I have a somewhat recent computer (about 3 
years old) that has an intel chipset (which Plymouth can't handle yet, 
and so it needs xdriver=vesa during install).

Michael, in Pennsylvania (USA)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-20 Thread David . Mackintosh
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:32:42PM -0500, Michael Klinosky wrote:
 
 Is CentOS basically like Fedora? (Well, except for the updates every 6
 months!) As in 'look  feel', underlying operations, etc. (Btw, I know 
 about removing upstream branding.)

Very basically.  CentOS/RHEL 5 is loosely based on Fedora Core 6,
just as CentOS/RHEL4 is loosely based on FC3.

I say loosely because RHEL 6 wasn't based on FC9, and if I am
understanding things correctly, won't be based on FC10 either.

 Any caveats? Meaning, does it use the same repositories that Fedora
 does? Are there any major or significant differences?

CentOS/RHEL is built for stability, meaning what they ship is what you
get.  You will see bug and security fixes for the applications merged
in, but (broadly generally speaking) no new features.

The exception to this is device drivers and support; new devices are added
to the kernel stream and to the xorg X display engine during each minor
release (ie 5.1 to 5.2).

As far as repositories go, there are several RHEL/CentOS friendly repositories
such as RPMforge.  RedHat has one of their own too.  Do some research before
connecting, they are not always compatible with each other.  My preference
is for RPMforge, but that's purely based on the fact that I've found enough
things in RPMforge that I want.  

Beyond that, you can *usually* make your own installable RPMs from
SRPMs for things that worked with FC6, and you can even resort to
building from source code although that gets you away from nice RPM
management.  Remember, the further you stray from the stock distribution,
the more you get into you get to keep all the pieces when it breaks
level support.

 I should just go for the most recent package (5.2) - yes? About how old 
 are the apps? (A few months?)

If you were happy with FC6, then yes you want CentOS 5.x.  The apps
are all not-quite-as-old-as FC6 versions were, but bugfix and
security patches are merged in.  CentOS 4.x has FC3-vintage
applications.  

The best practice is to do a minimal install from CD or DVD, then
immediately do a 'yum update', then 'yum install' the extra pieces
you need.  (Why?  Because if there is a pending update to something
you are wanting to use, there's no point installing it from DVD since
you will end up downloading it anyways.) 

 How are application updates handled? 5.2 has firefox-3.0-0.beta5.6.el5. 
 I saw (on the Firefox website) that 3.0.6 is out. Will an app update get 
 that version, or something just a bit older? (btw, I know about 
 backporting.)

Nope, CentOS 5 will probably have Firefox 3.0-0 for its lifetime.  If you
want something newer, you can probably retro-fit it yourself.  If you need
something newer, the stability of CentOS is probably not what you really
want.  Applications will not be generally refreshed until RHEL/CentOS 6.

 Does centos use Plymouth? I have a somewhat recent computer (about 3 
 years old) that has an intel chipset (which Plymouth can't handle yet, 
 and so it needs xdriver=vesa during install).

I don't know.  If FC6 could handle it, CentOS 5 can probably handle it.
Always use the latest DVD/CD image to do your initial install from, that
gives you the best chance of hardware compatibility.

-- 
 /\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh | 
 d...@xdroop.com  | http://www.xdroop.com


pgpEg7t5Te2Ee.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-20 Thread Michael A. Peters
david.mackint...@xdroop.com wrote:

 
 Nope, CentOS 5 will probably have Firefox 3.0-0 for its lifetime.  If you
 want something newer, you can probably retro-fit it yourself.  If you need
 something newer, the stability of CentOS is probably not what you really
 want.  Applications will not be generally refreshed until RHEL/CentOS 6.

5.2 has FireFox 3.0.5 (maybe has 3.0.6, I haven't done a yum update in 
awhile) and started with Firefox 1.5 in CentOS 5.0

RHEL made an exception w/ FireFox and updates - and it was justifiable.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

2009-02-20 Thread John

 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org 
 [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael Klinosky
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:33 PM
 To: centos maillist
 Subject: [CentOS] new user - with questions


Maybe the best way to determine if CentOS is for you is to download the
CentOS 5.2 Live CD Image. Put it into your cd drive and start up your
computer. That way you will get a LooK and FeeL of what it is like and some
of the associated apps like FireFox. At least that way will give you an
actual demonstration of it and you will know for sure if your hardware is
compatable also. I believe doing this will answer more of your questions
that you are lurking after.

CentOS has its' on repository to get updates for the OS which has mirrors
sites also. Addon extra packages can be obtained from other software repos
as long as package dependancies are solved. I would advise to stay away from
installing from source and sticking to *.rpm packages only, especially since
you would be a new user so to speak.

JohnStanley

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos