Re: [CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

2009-11-23 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:41 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of
> >> selinux
> >> complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
> >> here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of
> >> times, and it didn't fix it, and I've determined that it's clearly an
> >> error handling failure of selinux.
> >>
> >> So, I'm hoping to find someone else who's run into the same thing
> > 
> > the problem with sealert's is that the paths are relative so just
> > running the command without doing a 'cd /path/affected/by/selinux/'
> > doesn't actually work.
> 
> Wait - you mean I have to cd to /var/log/httpd, to run setsebool
> httpd_unified on? That makes no sense.
> 
> And I made the roles, etc, as close as I could, both on smagent and on its
> log file.

No, for setsebool, it's just a boolean policy and of course switching
the pwd is meaningless but for setting file contexts, it's very
meaningful...sorry for the lack of clarity.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

2009-11-23 Thread m . roth
> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of
>> selinux
>> complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
>> here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of
>> times, and it didn't fix it, and I've determined that it's clearly an
>> error handling failure of selinux.
>>
>> So, I'm hoping to find someone else who's run into the same thing
> 
> the problem with sealert's is that the paths are relative so just
> running the command without doing a 'cd /path/affected/by/selinux/'
> doesn't actually work.

Wait - you mean I have to cd to /var/log/httpd, to run setsebool
httpd_unified on? That makes no sense.

And I made the roles, etc, as close as I could, both on smagent and on its
log file.
>
> to specifically answer your question, no, I don't know of a specific
> CentOS-SELinux list but the general SELinux list is certainly all you
> need...
>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

Ah, ok, that's what I want, then. I looked over to selinux's site, and all
they have is a developers' list, which is not who I should bother.

Thanks!

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

2009-11-23 Thread Craig White
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:01 -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> The subject says it all. I've still got that irritating problem of selinux
> complaining with smagent writing to its own logfile, and as I mentioned
> here, weeks ago, I've done everything that sealert says, a number of
> times, and it didn't fix it, and I've determined that it's clearly an
> error handling failure of selinux.
> 
> So, I'm hoping to find someone else who's run into the same thing

the problem with sealert's is that the paths are relative so just
running the command without doing a 'cd /path/affected/by/selinux/'
doesn't actually work.

to specifically answer your question, no, I don't know of a specific
CentOS-SELinux list but the general SELinux list is certainly all you
need...

https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos