Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Lars Hecking
 
> Let me rephrase that, did you explicitly select these packages or did a group 
> pull them in?

 It is a custom group that originally included kmod-bnx2. I removed it but
 according to the yum log during install, it was still pulled in by kmod-cnic.
 So I needed to remove that one as well.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday 25 April 2012 12.48.43 Lars Hecking wrote:
> Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
> > On Wednesday 25 April 2012 10.53.46 Lars Hecking wrote:
> > ...
> > 
> > > > "yum remove kmod-bnx2" is suggested way to remove packages in a
> > > > dependency-
> > > > aware way.
> > >  
> > >  Slightly different situation here - I'm working off a local repo for
> > > 
> > > kickstart installations, so I don't want to install it in the first
> > > place.
> > > For that to happen, I need to exclude kmod-cnic as well or the bnx2 rpm
> > > gets pulled in anyway.
> > 
> > Interesting, are you saying that any standard install package selection
> > includes these updated drivers?
> 
>  I'm using a custom group that install pretty much everything. Ok, not
>  really everything, but about three quartes of all >6k packages. The local
>  repo is a repomanage merge of os and updates tree.

Let me rephrase that, did you explicitly select these packages or did a group 
pull them in?

/Peter

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Lars Hecking
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2012 10.53.46 Lars Hecking wrote:
> ...
> > > "yum remove kmod-bnx2" is suggested way to remove packages in a
> > > dependency-
> > > aware way.
> > 
> >  Slightly different situation here - I'm working off a local repo for
> > kickstart installations, so I don't want to install it in the first place.
> > For that to happen, I need to exclude kmod-cnic as well or the bnx2 rpm
> > gets pulled in anyway.
> 
> Interesting, are you saying that any standard install package selection 
> includes these updated drivers?
 
 I'm using a custom group that install pretty much everything. Ok, not
 really everything, but about three quartes of all >6k packages. The local
 repo is a repomanage merge of os and updates tree.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday 25 April 2012 10.53.46 Lars Hecking wrote:
...
> > "yum remove kmod-bnx2" is suggested way to remove packages in a
> > dependency-
> > aware way.
> 
>  Slightly different situation here - I'm working off a local repo for
> kickstart installations, so I don't want to install it in the first place.
> For that to happen, I need to exclude kmod-cnic as well or the bnx2 rpm
> gets pulled in anyway.

Interesting, are you saying that any standard install package selection 
includes these updated drivers?

/Peter


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Ned Slider
On 25/04/12 10:45, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2012 16.05.26 Ned Slider wrote:
>
> ...
>> In the meantime (as a workaround), just grab the missing firmware and
>> place it in the appropriate directory.
>
> No, in the meantime don't install kmod-bnx2 unless you need it, it's not meant
> as a general update for the kernel provided bnx2.
>

Agreed.

My workaround was assuming that one actually *needs* the updated driver.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Lars Hecking

> >  Looks like a vanilla kernel bug.
> > 
> >   http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/17/268
> 
> What you're hitting is similar but not the same. You installed an rpm that 
> redhat built for a few new NICs as part of their DUP (Driver Update Program):
 
 ACK.

> "yum remove kmod-bnx2" is suggested way to remove packages in a dependency-
> aware way.

 Slightly different situation here - I'm working off a local repo for kickstart
 installations, so I don't want to install it in the first place. For that
 to happen, I need to exclude kmod-cnic as well or the bnx2 rpm gets pulled
 in anyway.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 16.05.26 Ned Slider wrote:
> On 24/04/12 15:56, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
> >> On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
...
> >>> bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
> >> 
> >> This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer
> >> driver (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five
> >> files missing).>> 
...
> >> This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is
> >> a
> >> complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package).
> >> 
> >   Spot on - the working machine did not have kmod-bnx2 installed.
> >> 
> >> If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2
> >> package from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal
> >> kernel package.
> >> 
> >   Installing without kmod-bnx2 worked, and I also had to get rid of
> >   kmod-cnic, which /tmp/yum.log listed as requiring kmod-bnx2.
> 
> This is fixed in RHEL6.3 (beta) where the kernel-firmware package
> contains the latest firmware that you are missing above:

To be clear, there is no bug/problem in the kernel-firmware package in 6.2. 
This thread is about the behaviour of a driver update (kmod-bnx2) with its own 
(incomplete) set of firmware. As you point out, 6.3 will have the new driver 
and its firmware.

...
> In the meantime (as a workaround), just grab the missing firmware and
> place it in the appropriate directory.

No, in the meantime don't install kmod-bnx2 unless you need it, it's not meant 
as a general update for the kernel provided bnx2.

/Peter


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-25 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 15.56.09 Lars Hecking wrote:
> Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
> > On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
> > >  I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
> > > 
> > > including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
> > > interfaces.
> > > 
> > >  dmesg says:
> > > bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
> > 
> > This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer
> > driver (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files
> > missing).
>  Looks like a vanilla kernel bug.
> 
>   http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/17/268

What you're hitting is similar but not the same. You installed an rpm that 
redhat built for a few new NICs as part of their DUP (Driver Update Program):

 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0503.html

Afaict, they say not to use it for other NICs. In your case a non listed NIC 
broke because that package lacked some firmware.

That is, the problem is crystal clear, bug in the kmod-bnx2 package (but it 
could be claimed to be a documented limitation...).

> > This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a
> > complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package).
> 
>  Spot on - the working machine did not have kmod-bnx2 installed.
> 
> > If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2
> > package from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal
> > kernel package.
> 
>  Installing without kmod-bnx2 worked, and I also had to get rid of
> kmod-cnic, which /tmp/yum.log listed as requiring kmod-bnx2.

"yum remove kmod-bnx2" is suggested way to remove packages in a dependency-
aware way.

/Peter

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-24 Thread Ned Slider
On 24/04/12 15:56, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
>> On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
>>>   I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
>>> including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
>>> interfaces.
>>>
>>>   dmesg says:
>>> bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
>>
>> This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer driver
>> (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files missing).
>
>   Looks like a vanilla kernel bug.
>
>http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/17/268
>
>> This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a
>> complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package).
>
>   Spot on - the working machine did not have kmod-bnx2 installed.
>
>> If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2 package
>> from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel
>> package.
>
>   Installing without kmod-bnx2 worked, and I also had to get rid of kmod-cnic,
>   which /tmp/yum.log listed as requiring kmod-bnx2.
>

This is fixed in RHEL6.3 (beta) where the kernel-firmware package 
contains the latest firmware that you are missing above:

$ rpm -q kernel-firmware
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-262.el6.noarch
$ rpm -ql kernel-firmware | grep bnx2-mips
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.0.15.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.1.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.3.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j15.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j3.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.0.17.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1a.fw
/lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw

In the meantime (as a workaround), just grab the missing firmware and 
place it in the appropriate directory.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-24 Thread Lars Hecking
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
> On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
> >  I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
> > including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
> > interfaces.
> > 
> >  dmesg says:
> > bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
> 
> This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer driver 
> (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files missing).
 
 Looks like a vanilla kernel bug.

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/17/268

> This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a 
> complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package).
 
 Spot on - the working machine did not have kmod-bnx2 installed.

> If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2 package 
> from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel 
> package.

 Installing without kmod-bnx2 worked, and I also had to get rid of kmod-cnic,
 which /tmp/yum.log listed as requiring kmod-bnx2.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
>  I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
> including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
> interfaces.
> 
>  dmesg says:
> bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"

This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer driver 
(2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files missing).

...
>  What I don't understand is: I have an identical machine that I installed
>  under 6.2 a while back, and kept up to date, and it doesn't have this
>  problem. However, it tells me it uses version v2.1.11 (July 20, 2011) of
>  the driver, how is that possible?

This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a 
complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package).

If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2 package 
from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel 
package.

/Peter


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-23 Thread Lars Hecking
 
> There are now new external kernel modules for that:
> 
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018587.html
> 
> 
> yum install kmod-bnx2

 They are all installed.

# yum list installed kmod\*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, kabi, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading support for CentOS kernel ABI
Cleaning repos: base extras updates
Cleaning up Everything
Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, kabi, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading support for CentOS kernel ABI
Determining fastest mirrors
base | 3.7 kB 00:00 ... 
base/primary_db  | 4.5 MB 00:00 ... 
updates  | 3.5 kB 00:00 ... 
updates/primary_db   | 2.9 MB 00:00 ... 
Installed Packages
kmod-bnx2.x86_64  2.2.1-1.el6_2 @anaconda-CentOS-201112091719.x86_64/6.2
kmod-bnx2fc.x86_641.0.10-1.el6_2@anaconda-CentOS-201112091719.x86_64/6.2
kmod-bnx2i.x86_64 2.7.2.1-1.el6_2   @anaconda-CentOS-201112091719.x86_64/6.2
kmod-bnx2x.x86_64 1.72.00_0-1.el6_2 @anaconda-CentOS-201112091719.x86_64/6.2
kmod-bnx2x-firmware.x86_64
  1.72.00_0-1.el6_2 @anaconda-CentOS-201112091719.x86_64/6.2
kmod-cnic.x86_64  2.5.9-1.el6_2 @anaconda-CentOS-201112091719.x86_64/6.2
kmod-tg3.x86_64   3.119-2.el6_1 @base   
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, kabi, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading support for CentOS kernel ABI
Cleaning repos: base extras updates
0 package files removed

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken

2012-04-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/23/2012 11:54 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
>  I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files, including
>  kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network interfaces.
>
>  dmesg says:
>
> bnx2: Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.2.1 (Dec 18, 2011)
>   alloc irq_desc for 36 on node -1
>   alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
> bnx2 :01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 36 (level, low) -> IRQ 36
> bnx2 :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> bnx2 :01:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw
> bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
> bnx2 :01:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
> bnx2: probe of :01:00.0 failed with error -2
>
>  The firmware file is missing from /lib/firmware and the kernel-firmware rpm.
>
>  I found a copy of it on a Fedora site and dumped it into the right location,
>  but it wasn't found after a reboot. Yet, it was found after a second reboot.
>  Why is that? Is a rebuild of initramfs triggered somehow?
>
>  What I don't understand is: I have an identical machine that I installed
>  under 6.2 a while back, and kept up to date, and it doesn't have this
>  problem. However, it tells me it uses version v2.1.11 (July 20, 2011) of
>  the driver, how is that possible?
>
> # grep bnx2 /var/log/messages
> Apr 23 17:10:03 localhost kernel: bnx2: Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit 
> Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.1.11 (July 20, 2011)
> Apr 23 17:10:03 localhost kernel: bnx2 :01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 36 
> (level, low) -> IRQ 36
> Apr 23 17:10:03 localhost kernel: bnx2 :01:00.0: firmware: requesting 
> bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1a.fw
> Apr 23 17:10:03 localhost kernel: bnx2 :01:00.0: firmware: requesting 
> bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-6.0.17.fw
> Apr 23 17:10:03 localhost kernel: bnx2 :01:00.0: eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme 
> II BCM5716 1000Base-T (C0) PCI Express found at mem da00, IRQ 36, node 
> addr 78:2b:cb:67:3f:b6
> [...]
>
> # modinfo /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko
> filename:   
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko
> firmware:   bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09ax-6.0.17.fw
> firmware:   bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-6.0.17.fw
> firmware:   bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1a.fw
> firmware:   bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-6.0.15.fw
> firmware:   bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.1.fw
> version:2.1.11
> license:GPL
> description:Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5706/5708/5709/5716 Driver
> [...]
>
> # lspci -v -s 01:00.1 
> 01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5716 
> Gigabit Ethernet (rev 20)
> Subsystem: Dell PowerEdge R410 BCM5716 Gigabit Ethernet
> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48
> Memory at dc00 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=32M]
> Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 3
> Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
> Capabilities: [58] MSI: Enable- Count=1/16 Maskable- 64bit+
> Capabilities: [a0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=9 Masked-
> Capabilities: [ac] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
> Capabilities: [100] Device Serial Number 78-2b-cb-ff-fe-67-3f-b7
> Capabilities: [110] Advanced Error Reporting
> Capabilities: [150] Power Budgeting 
> Capabilities: [160] Virtual Channel 
> Kernel driver in use: bnx2
> Kernel modules: bnx2

There are now new external kernel modules for that:

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018587.html


yum install kmod-bnx2







signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos