Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-24 Thread m . roth
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 2/23/2011 6:42 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>>
>> To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"
>
> Every time I see that quote, I hear Jack Nicholson as The Joker in Batman.

Back in the what, late seventies, early eighties? there was a real popular
self-help book called "I'm Ok, You're Ok". I saw news reports, and heard
from folks, that they tried it in jails to "help the prisoners
rehabilitate themselves".

Didn't work: the guards treated it as, "I'm ok, you're in jail".

And closer to on topic, "recall"? This isn't an intranet, but a mailing
list on the 'Net. Recall doesn't work

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-24 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 2/23/2011 6:42 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>
> To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"

Every time I see that quote, I hear Jack Nicholson as The Joker in Batman.

-- 
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-24 Thread Giles Coochey

On 24/02/2011 00:42, David Brian Chait wrote:

> From Larry's web site: http://www.texoma.net/it/contact_us.html


ab...@texoma.net to report violations of netiquette

To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"
__
Or, at least, can't you just distance yourself and ignore someone who 
obviously isn't ever going to agree with you? Be it by some obvious 
non-disposition to your own beliefs? This isn't a religion based 
discussion group...


I saw someone ask for list moderation or banning of a user here... I 
don't think that is necessary, just don't rise to the bait of a troll - 
bite once if you really must, but remember they are just trying to add 
noise to an otherwise rational discussion group. So it is not worth 
getting into an elongated thread about it.


--
Best Regards,

Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086
NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131
GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-23 Thread aurfalien
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:42 PM, David Brian Chait wrote:

>
>> From Larry's web site: http://www.texoma.net/it/contact_us.html
>
>> ab...@texoma.net to report violations of netiquette
>
> To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"

Yea its like Dork Wars 2011.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-23 Thread David Brian Chait

>From Larry's web site: http://www.texoma.net/it/contact_us.html

>ab...@texoma.net to report violations of netiquette

To quote Rodney King.."Can't we all just get along?"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-23 Thread Always Learning

On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:

> Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0600:
> 
> > This message is RECALLED
> 
> Please stop this! Please understand that there is a reply button on your 
> mail client, use it!

I thought 'recall' was a Micro$oft facility. Centos is a Linux system. I
don't think it runs on Micro$oft. 

My systems simply ignore all 'recalls'.

>From Larry's web site: http://www.texoma.net/it/contact_us.html

ab...@texoma.net to report violations of netiquette

-- 

With best regards,

Paul.
England,
EU.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-23 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:47:13 -0600:

> This message is RECALLED

Please stop this! Please understand that there is a reply button on your 
mail client, use it!

Kai


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] RECALL: http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnerability-advisory-issued

2011-02-23 Thread Markus Falb
On 23.2.2011 21:47, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Larry Vaden 
>  wrote:
>> US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
>> versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
>>
>> Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
> 
> This message is RECALLED even though:
> 
> 1) US-CERT used the word "affected."
> 2) the "optionally" was directed to those who might have used
> RHEL/CentOS' excellent facility to draw in code from other repos.

You dont got it ? Another try: There will be no backport, because bind
in RHEL/CentOS is not affected. But yes, optionally one can wait...

-- 
Best Regards, Markus Falb, waiting...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos