Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following: Karanbir Singh wrote: The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 ) Any update? Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip. Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO :-D They should have stuck with the when it's ready response instead of telling us the 5th or 6th, then Monday night. They created greater anticipation by suggesting an actual time line. And greater frustration by missing it. When it's ready always worked for me in the past, but since they gave a date this time, I've been obsessively checking the mirrors looking for the release. It's human nature. -- Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
Scott Silva wrote: on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following: Karanbir Singh wrote: The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 ) Any update? Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip. Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ROFL ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip. Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO Are we there yet? NO :-D You haven't tried the Shrek trick? After the first ten of Are we there yet? NO, do this: Are we there yet? Yes. REALLY? NO!!! ;^) mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They should have stuck with the when it's ready response instead of telling us the 5th or 6th, then Monday night. They created greater anticipation by suggesting an actual time line. And greater frustration by missing it. When it's ready always worked for me in the past, but since they gave a date this time, I've been obsessively checking the mirrors looking for the release. It's human nature. Agreed! If people on the mailing list are frigid, then we would have a big problem. If one or two are waiting for the updates then the list is live. :-) Thanks, Josh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
David Hrbáè wrote: Glad to see some info and not only typical when it's done it's done. We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on We = RHEL? Last I checked CentOS wasn't supported by most of the enterprise things out there(though sometimes you can get lucky). If someone is that eager to get the latest code they should be using RHEL. As for me I probably won't bother with 4.7 until early next year. I still have systems running RHEL 4 update 1 that I need to deal with..(stuff I inherited when I took a new job earlier this year). nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
nate wrote: David Hrbáè wrote: Glad to see some info and not only typical when it's done it's done. We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on We = RHEL? We == CentOS. Last I checked CentOS wasn't supported by most of the enterprise things out there(though sometimes you can get lucky). It still is an Enterprise Distribution in terms of support time frames. Cheers, Ralph pgpdVpo3g16oQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following: Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available. When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced. The status of CentOS 4.7 release can be tracked in this forum thread: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=15439forum=27 Akemi / toracat ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
where can we get ISOs? I can test for VirtualBox atleast. If there is a problem I will submit a bug. On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following: Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available. When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available. What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? I would really like to see NCQ support on SATA drives. Then again some have said it does not help much. I have an email server that is somewhat disk I/O bound. Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
Matt wrote: What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS4.7 Cheers, Ralph pgpINMiAVvyBg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status
Scott Silva napsal(a): 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available. When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced. Glad to see some info and not only typical when it's done it's done. We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on progress. Especially in that case, when translators were warn a month ago to prepare RN soon. Not mentioning that 4.x boxes are not receiving updates/security fixes due to. So thanks for the info Scott. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
