Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vandaman wrote: I'm listening if you have any other comments or advice on my situation. Sorry, I missed the question. - -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJFIvlHgnbf2T2QqMRAnTIAKCy8MxxD9M6keYkW3F//KO6KDIx2ACeOJen da1iR3nF2nT/E5NgWEO5M5Y= =RIpD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
Milton Calnek wrote: Sorry, I missed the question. I'm severely confused and I don't know what I'm talking about. My friend, stop misquoting me. See http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/067393.html Regards, Vandaman. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
Vandaman wrote: Milton Calnek wrote: Sorry, I missed the question. I'm severely confused and I don't know what I'm talking about. My friend, stop misquoting me. See http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/067393.html Are you leading by example here? -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
Linuxguy123 wrote: I've been a RH/Fedora guy since the RH8 days. When Fedora came along, I moved to it, but its been a bit painful beta testing software all the time. I ran Ubuntu for a while, but I found their package management to be difficult... I do a lot of technical work, development and loading and building special stuff. I much prefer RPMs over other methods of package distribution. I'm listening if you have any other comments or advice on my situation. You are the guy who is having a bit of a moan on the Fedora list about KDE. How many patches have you contributed to Fedora or to CentOS? This is open source after all, you have access to the source. Regards, Vandaman. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
Hi, for what it's worth, I'm running CentOS 5 with the planet-core, planet-ccrma and novell-mono repos which exist for centos/rhel5 these days. The planet-core repo contains the 2.6.24.7 with realtime patches and other goodness for audio/video stuffs. I've been using this setup for about 6 months now and i'm very happy with the stability + speed this offers. Greets, Rubin. Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Phil Schaffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:33 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge) kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but that is a pain. Does someone keep a separate repository that has more modern kernels ? Can yum be configured to use only specific packages (ie kernels) from a specific repository ? Why not step up and offer to maintain a bleeding edge kernel in the centos-plus repos ? IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would let people still use the traditional centos-plus kernels (derived from the same kernel versions with additional components being turned on) would be required. Otherwise there would be too much risk of people unintentionally updating to bleeding-edge kernels. I think it would need to be a seperate repo for other reasons... I believe lots of userspace/kernelspace changed in the 2.6.22 time frame so a lot of sub-packages need to handle to. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
Phil Schaffner wrote: IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would let people still use the traditional centos-plus kernels Sure, thats a bridge to cross when we have someone offering to maintain this. And I was already thinking along those lines.. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
Linuxguy123 wrote: b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge) kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but that is a pain. Does someone keep a separate repository that has more modern kernels ? Can yum be configured to use only specific packages (ie kernels) from a specific repository ? Why not step up and offer to maintain a bleeding edge kernel in the centos-plus repos ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge) kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but that is a pain. Does someone keep a separate repository that has more modern kernels ? Can yum be configured to use only specific packages (ie kernels) from a specific repository ? Why not step up and offer to maintain a bleeding edge kernel in the centos-plus repos ? That would not be a bad idea. I always wondered how well a recent kernel would work with CentOS 5, but I never took the time to test a Fedora kernel on my dependable boxes. A project with this focus might indeed be useful. -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Dag Wieers wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge) kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but that is a pain. Does someone keep a separate repository that has more modern kernels ? Can yum be configured to use only specific packages (ie kernels) from a specific repository ? Why not step up and offer to maintain a bleeding edge kernel in the centos-plus repos ? That would not be a bad idea. I always wondered how well a recent kernel would work with CentOS 5, but I never took the time to test a Fedora kernel on my dependable boxes. A project with this focus might indeed be useful. Let me add that nothing should be holding you (anyone) from starting a project by sending an email with intentions, get hold of a wiki-page to list your ideas and progress and motivating people to help and test. Whether that is a bleeding-edge kernel project, a new tool to migrate sideways to and from RHEL, or a design, documentation or translation project. I am sure your effort is useful, but often it needs commitment and determination to get things going. -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:33 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge) kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but that is a pain. Does someone keep a separate repository that has more modern kernels ? Can yum be configured to use only specific packages (ie kernels) from a specific repository ? Why not step up and offer to maintain a bleeding edge kernel in the centos-plus repos ? IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would let people still use the traditional centos-plus kernels (derived from the same kernel versions with additional components being turned on) would be required. Otherwise there would be too much risk of people unintentionally updating to bleeding-edge kernels. Along these lines, it might be a good idea to add some of the other more modern features for those who want them and understand the risks - again in a clearly specified bleeding-edge repo (or repos) - as long as people are willing to step up and help with building, testing, and maintaining packages. From recent requests on the list there seems to be some pent-up demand for newer features. This could help establish CentOS as both a platform that can be used by those who want EL stability but don't need the support, and as a bridge for testing new features on a stable base. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tired of Fedora, shopping for a new OS. Upgrade from F8 ? CentOS kernel versions ?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Phil Schaffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:33 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: Linuxguy123 wrote: b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge) kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but that is a pain. Does someone keep a separate repository that has more modern kernels ? Can yum be configured to use only specific packages (ie kernels) from a specific repository ? Why not step up and offer to maintain a bleeding edge kernel in the centos-plus repos ? IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would let people still use the traditional centos-plus kernels (derived from the same kernel versions with additional components being turned on) would be required. Otherwise there would be too much risk of people unintentionally updating to bleeding-edge kernels. I think it would need to be a seperate repo for other reasons... I believe lots of userspace/kernelspace changed in the 2.6.22 time frame so a lot of sub-packages need to handle to. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
