Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?
On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. somewhere (semi)officially? where? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?
On 19/12/16 16:38, lejeczek wrote: On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. somewhere (semi)officially? where? yes, of course. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?
On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?
On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote: On 19/12/16 16:05, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 08:33 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-4-elfutils-libelf-0.163-2.el7.x86_64 VS elfutils-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 isn't devtool ageing? Could this be the case with more packages? regards, devtoolset-6 is available. devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ? Looks like it is being made available, but not all there yet. Wait a few days and check again, I guess. I just happened to notice that some devtoolset-6 packages were out there; must not yet be the full set. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4 ageing?
On 12/19/2016 01:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/19/2016 11:47 AM, lejeczek wrote: devtoolset-6-runtime is missing from repo(s) ? Looks like it is being made available, but not all there yet. Wait a few days and check again, I guess. I just happened to notice that some devtoolset-6 packages were out there; must not yet be the full set. I just successfully installed devtoolset-6 from the repos. Also, there has been a devtoolset-4 update; a yum update should pull in the updated devtoolset-4 packages, and a yum install devtoolset-6 should work for you now (it just did for me). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
