Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 11/03/2009 12:09 AM, Todd Denniston wrote:
 Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the 
 CentOS team keeps it
 around to do the matching builds?

The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the 
only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are 
doing, that issue might or might not be relevant.

-- 
Karanbir Singh
London, UK| http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219  | Yahoo IM: z00dax  | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread Todd Denniston
Karanbir Singh wrote, On 11/03/2009 04:57 AM:
 The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the 
 only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are 
 doing, that issue might or might not be relevant.
 

Thanks for yours and Mr. X's feedback.
Off to try mock out and see if I do or don't like it. :)
And do a little thinking on the relevance of using the distro version of mock.
-- 
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-03 Thread David Hrbáč
Todd Denniston napsal(a):
 I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and 
 so I was about to 
 install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras 
 and another in epel.
 
 epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that 
 would suggest sticking 
 with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version 
 number on the epel one 
 to go with it?
 
 Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the 
 CentOS team keeps it 
 around to do the matching builds?
 
 Thanks for the clarifications.

Hi Todd,
I use mock from our repo:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mock.html
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mock.html
David Hrbáč
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

2009-11-02 Thread Mr. X


--- On Mon, 11/2/09, Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil 
wrote:

 From: Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil
 Subject: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel
 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 4:09 PM
 I am looking to be a bit more
 standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about
 to 
 install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the
 centos/5/extras and another in epel.
 
 epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences
 in this group that would suggest sticking 
 with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than
 the shiny version number on the epel one 
 to go with it?

I'm a rank and file package builder too. Of course, Mock is not part of Centos 
base and you can't damage your install by using it, since it runs in a chroot.

Use the latest version (which might be epel) and get the hang of it - you may 
not like using it.

If you want to do broad searches about mock in C5, try the centos-dev group 
from the lists.centos.org page or #centos-dev on IRC.

-- 
Mark




  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos