Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:11 PM, fred smith wrote: how about something (seemingly simple) like this: find out how many there are: count=`ls * | grep -c .MOV$` then diagnose the result: if [ $count -ge 1 ] then do your stuff here else echo oops. nothing to do! fi of course, there are pitfalls... we're asuming that there are only FILES that would match the pattern .MOV, no directories. very effective for my purposes, thanks. Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On 16/08/12 08:19, Craig White wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) The problem is the outermost double quotes in the $(...) expression and figuring out how to pass the appropriate quotes into the subshell created by the $(). One trick is to let the outer shell do the interpolation first. The following script may be informative: == #!/bin/bash NAME=*.mov echo $NAME echo $NAME echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo \$NAME\) echo $(echo '$NAME') echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo \$NAME\) echo $(echo '$NAME') if test -n $(find . -name $NAME) then echo FOUND IT fi == Hope this helps, Kal -- Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd(w) +61 (0) 3 9008 5281 Suite 1415 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: On 16/08/12 08:19, Craig White wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) The problem is the outermost double quotes in the $(...) expression and figuring out how to pass the appropriate quotes into the subshell created by the $(). One trick is to let the outer shell do the interpolation first. The following script may be informative: == #!/bin/bash NAME=*.mov echo $NAME echo $NAME echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo \$NAME\) echo $(echo '$NAME') echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo $NAME) echo $(echo \$NAME\) echo $(echo '$NAME') if test -n $(find . -name $NAME) then echo FOUND IT fi == Hope this helps, sort of but the other suggestion was more than sufficient for my purposes. Interesting that I could have the variable in double quotes inside the double quoted braces and it still worked. I would have never actually tried it. Thanks Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) and if there is one file in this directory - ie test.mov, this works fine but if there are two (or more) files in this directory - test.mov, test2.mov then I get an error... find: paths must precede expression So my code is evidently wrong. I just want a test for 1 or more files ending in .mov in the directory? Any one want to toss me a bone here? Run the script with -x to see what's happening. $NAME is probably getting expanded. You might have to set noglob. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Craig White wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) and if there is one file in this directory - ie test.mov, this works fine but if there are two (or more) files in this directory - test.mov, test2.mov then I get an error... find: paths must precede expression The substitution of $NAME is expanding the wild card, giving you a single -name with two arguments. You probably want something like: NAME=\*.mov Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
I gess you could also avoid the expension with: if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name \$NAME\ -print -quit) 2012/8/15 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com: On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Craig White wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) and if there is one file in this directory - ie test.mov, this works fine but if there are two (or more) files in this directory - test.mov, test2.mov then I get an error... find: paths must precede expression The substitution of $NAME is expanding the wild card, giving you a single -name with two arguments. You probably want something like: NAME=\*.mov Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
Put escaped double quotes around name, like \$NAME\ in the test expression. -- Pat Welch Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) and if there is one file in this directory - ie test.mov, this works fine but if there are two (or more) files in this directory - test.mov, test2.mov then I get an error... find: paths must precede expression So my code is evidently wrong. I just want a test for 1 or more files ending in .mov in the directory? Any one want to toss me a bone here? -- Craig White ~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com 1.800.869.6908 ~~ www.ttiassessments.com Need help communicating between generations at work to achieve your desired success? Let us help! _ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
Some really good suggestions but unfortunately no dice On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Larry Martell wrote: Run the script with -x to see what's happening. $NAME is probably getting expanded. You might have to set noglob. set +o noglob (inside or outside script made no difference On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: The substitution of $NAME is expanding the wild card, giving you a single -name with two arguments. You probably want something like: NAME=\*.mov - Definitely agree that it's expanding the glob but this doesn't work - On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote: (and Patrick Welch too) I gess you could also avoid the expension with: if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name \$NAME\ -print -quit) thought this would be a winner but it seems to completely miss everything with the $NAME completely Thanks Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote: Some really good suggestions but unfortunately no dice On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Larry Martell wrote: Run the script with -x to see what's happening. $NAME is probably getting expanded. You might have to set noglob. set +o noglob (inside or outside script made no difference This worked for me: $ cat t.sh set -o noglob NAME=*.mov find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print $ touch t.mov t2.mov $ bash t.sh ./t.mov ./t2.mov ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 05:19:22PM -0600, Larry Martell wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote: Some really good suggestions but unfortunately no dice On Aug 15, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Larry Martell wrote: Run the script with -x to see what's happening. $NAME is probably getting expanded. You might have to set noglob. set +o noglob (inside or outside script made no difference This worked for me: $ cat t.sh set -o noglob NAME=*.mov find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print $ touch t.mov t2.mov $ bash t.sh ./t.mov ./t2.mov how about something (seemingly simple) like this: find out how many there are: count=`ls * | grep -c .MOV$` then diagnose the result: if [ $count -ge 1 ] then do your stuff here else echo oops. nothing to do! fi of course, there are pitfalls... we're asuming that there are only FILES that would match the pattern .MOV, no directories. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] stupid bash question
On 08/15/2012 06:19 PM, Craig White wrote: the relevant snippet is... NAME=*.mov cd $IN if test -n $(find . -maxdepth 1 -name $NAME -print -quit) and if there is one file in this directory - ie test.mov, this works fine but if there are two (or more) files in this directory - test.mov, test2.mov then I get an error... find: paths must precede expression So my code is evidently wrong. I just want a test for 1 or more files ending in .mov in the directory? Any one want to toss me a bone here? Are you trying to find out if there are one or more files that match, or are you trying to list the name(s) of the files? NAME=`ls *.mov` for FILE in $NAME do echo $FILE done -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 www.counter.li.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
