Re: [CentOS-docs] Correction to HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey

2012-05-07 Thread Phil Schaffner
Yves Bellefeuille wrote on 05/01/2012 10:07 PM:
 On Sunday 29 April 2012, Alan Bartletta...@elrepo.org  wrote:

 Thank you, Yves. I've taken care of both of those points. Would you
 like to check that it now reads correctly, please?
 There are a few more points that should be added. They should all appear
 after the end of the current list.

 During the installation process, the user is asked What type of media
 contains the installation image? The user should select the first
 partition on the USB key, which usually appears in the menu under Hard
 drive, then /dev/sdb1.

 After partitioning, the user is asked whether to install the Grub boot
 loader and where to install it. After booting from the USB key, the BIOS
 thinks that the USB key is the first drive. To install the Grub boot
 loader on the hard drive, which is the usual case, the user must change
 the order of the hard drives using the Grub installation options.

 After the Grub installation options, the following error message
 appears: Missing ISO 9660 image: The installer has tried to mount image
 #1, but cannot find it on the hard drive. The installation program is
 looking for the ISO file on the first partition of the USB key, but it's
 on the second partition. The user should go to a terminal (Ctrl-Alt-F2),
 unmount the first partition of the USB key (umount /mnt/isodir), mount
 the second partition (mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/isodir), return to
 the installation program (Ctrl-Alt-F6) and choose Retry.

 (Unmounting /dev/sdb1 doesn't interfere with the installation process. I
 tried creating a link from /dev/sdb1 to the ISO image, but that didn't
 work, because /dev/sdb1 contains a VFAT or FAT32 flle system which
 doesn't support links.)


Thanks for the suggestions, and the help editing..  I will try to get to 
it soon.

Phil

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS Wiki - Editing Rights

2012-05-07 Thread Guillaume Rembert

 
 Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 23:43:23 +0200
 From: Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS Wiki - Editing Rights
 To: centos-docs@centos.org
 Message-ID: 4fa6f07b.2040...@gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 On 30.04.2012 11:27, Guillaume Rembert wrote:
  Hello CentOS community,
  
  Would it be possible to become a CentOS Wiki contributor, please?
  
  My UserName is GuillaumeRembert.
  
  There are some commands which are not valid anymore on some articles,
  with CentOS 6.2 release, that I would like to correct.
 
 Can you tell me where you want to edit? We begin with a few editing
 rights, which then can be expanded.
 
 Cheers and thanks,
 
 Ralph
 
 

Hello Ralph,

The major part that I would like to edit is currently linked to this
article. I would like to update it for the CentOS 6 distribution:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS

I don't exactly know how are managed the wiki editing rights, but what
could be nice is to have a kind of intermediate editing profile, where
somebody wanting to contribute could make some corrections on any
article, but there would be a moderator that confirm the information can
be published, in order to keep control on the quality of the docs.

This would avoid that some information would be lost mainly due to this
hard procedure to edit/correct an article. I took some notes on what I
found out has changed on this article hopefully, but I will have to
perform again the steps to make sure that it is alright.

I am currently on servers installations. There will be some other
services and configurations that I am going through on CentOS 6, like
mails, web, etc (installation of them from the minimal setup with the
new IPA engine).

Is it possible? What do you think about it?

Guillaume

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs