[CentOS-docs] Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

[957714be]

** Delivery incomplete **

There was a temporary problem delivering your message to 
curtiskwong...@gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 47 more hours. You'll be 
notified if the delivery fails permanently.



Reporting-MTA: dns; googlemail.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; FWD-737RRYSMHVAHYD4AM4SVAJDFQBQCCKKLAEEFAM2BAYANQAUQAWAA53RAMYAEYAFMEEQAAIA=@opayq.com
Arrival-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: 

Final-Recipient: rfc822; curtiskwong101@gmail.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.0.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Will-Retry-Until: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:03:56 -0700 (PDT)


Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo
Description: Message attachment
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes

[Karsten Wade]

On 09/19/2018 03:35 AM, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote:
> From someone who doesn't know anything about design/legal, what is the
> difference between this instance and what was done in point 7.3 of the
> link (7.3. For special sub-projects)?

Essentially similar, in that specific permission was granted and a
specific logo was prepared.  In this case, the permission has been
requested and there is not a corresponding logo prepared on the ArtWork
page.

> BTW, that is the logo only;

There are two aspects here:

1. Should the project allow for the graphical logo to be used without
the wordmark?

2. If yes to 1, the project should adjust one or both guidelines to make
it explicit what can and cannot be done.

For #1 it may be that we want to do so for various cases, but there may
be reasons and risks we are not aware of in using the logo stand-alone
in various situations.  For this I am seeking expert advice.

As it happens, the trademark guidelines do allow for some uses of just
the logo, point 5 here:

https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/#acceptable-uses

But there is not a corresponding graphic and how-to on the ArtWork page.

What I want to do is i) as quickly as we can resolve the question of
permission for GNOME so they can move on with their development, and ii)
fix any actual or perceived inconsistencies between the trademark
guidelines and the logo usage guidelines.

Best regards,

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid
Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen
https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io
gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[CentOS-docs] Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

[957714be]

** Delivery incomplete **

There was a temporary problem delivering your message to 
curtiskwong...@gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 46 more hours. You'll be 
notified if the delivery fails permanently.



Reporting-MTA: dns; googlemail.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; FWD-737RRYSMHVAHYD4AM4SVAJDFQBQCCKKLAEEFAM2BAYANQAUQAWAA53RAMYAEYAFMEEQAAIA=@opayq.com
Arrival-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 05:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: 

Final-Recipient: rfc822; curtiskwong101@gmail.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.0.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Will-Retry-Until: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 05:20:13 -0700 (PDT)


Re: [CentOS-docs] Header image of blog.centos.org
Description: Message attachment
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] Header image of blog.centos.org

[Rich Bowen]

On 9/18/18 9:16 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM Rich Bowen  wrote:


On 9/18/18 8:27 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:

On 18/09/18 14:19, Rich Bowen wrote:

Hmm. I matched the existing banner size identically as I assumed it was
correct. There are in fact 4 banners now on random rotate.


I'm not a designer, but what about using something that have some kind
of "centos look-n-feel" at the design level ?

What about the common banner we use almost everywhere, including wiki  ?

Just my two cents, but (also just my opinion) some of the new ones
aren't really looking good (including for the centos logo on top not
being displayed correctly as with some kind of "white on white")


Ok, I've reverted back to the original single banner image, and will go
ask the folks on the Artwork SIG for their input.

I was looking for creative ways to use some of the photos from various
events - some of the new ones were from CERN, and others from DevConf.US.


I'm afraid that, if a photo contains identifiable faces, one would
need a permission to post from each person.

I like Fabian's idea of using the same image as the one for the wiki.
That image also has the "right height".


The one on the wiki is not wide enough - you'll notice that it repeats 
on the wiki version. I'll see if I can make it work, but if anybody 
knows where that image originated, that would be helpful, so I can work 
from that. Thanks.


--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@redhat.com
@CentOSProject // @rbowen
859 351 9166
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes

[Pablo Sebastián Greco]

El 18/9/18 a las 20:07, Karsten Wade escribió:

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:

My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0].
However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and
we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1]

Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a
violation of the trademark.

[0]: 
https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo#head-bf605cecf99c819d5a39e726ffb928999e1a13e6
[1]: 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CentOS#/media/File:CentOS_color_logo.svg

Hi Fabiano,

Thanks for clarifying and that connects with what Rich said about how
we've used just the graphic logo mark in practice but do not have a
guideline that allows that on the ArtWork wiki.

This item is actually on my short list of things to clarify for the
trademark guidelines and updates on the ArtWork page.

For the moment, we can pursue a specific permission for GNOME Boxes.
Can you provide a mock-up of how it would appear on the page?

I'm looking at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Boxes but am not sure how it
would appear.  Am I correct that the logo would appear when running the
GNOME Boxes application inside of a GNOME session?  If yes, is there
also a corresponding use on the website?  A mock-up from there would be
useful as well.

Knowing that this has been missed for a few months, I'll work through
the discussions on our side to expedite a decision for you.
From someone who doesn't know anything about design/legal, what is the 
difference between this instance and what was done in point 7.3 of the 
link (7.3. For special sub-projects)?

BTW, that is the logo only;

Pablo.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[CentOS-docs] [Gitblit] arrfab pushed 1 commits => websites/centos.org.git

[Gitblit]

https://git.centos.org/summary/websites!centos.org.git

>---
 master branch updated (1 commits)
>---

 Fabian Arrotin 
 Wednesday, September 19, 2018 07:10 +

 Renamed a sponsor and removed one

 
https://git.centos.org/commit/websites!centos.org.git/95ca8c826f922546b390fa5e82c1518916a3d216
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs