Re: [CentOS-docs] rpmforge references in the wiki

[Tom Sorensen]

Burn the references with fire.

If there are any references to litko then they should be treated equally.
Both are dead.

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka 
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison:
>
>> Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the
>> wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)...
>>
>> A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to
>> rpmforge.  As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+
>> years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material
>> for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is
>> trusted, epel for example.
>>
>> I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this
>> matter up here.
>>
>
> As allready mentioned +1 from in replacing where possible and removing
> where not.
>
>>
>> Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just
>> a pipedream.  References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki
>> users.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>
>> all the best
> Christoph
> --
> Christoph Galuschka
> CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch
> ___
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] rpmforge references in the wiki

[Christoph Galuschka]

Hello everyone,

Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison:

Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the
wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)...

A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to
rpmforge.  As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+
years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material
for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is
trusted, epel for example.

I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this
matter up here.


As allready mentioned +1 from in replacing where possible and removing 
where not.


Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just
a pipedream.  References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki
users.





John



___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


all the best
Christoph
--
Christoph Galuschka
CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[CentOS-docs] rpmforge references in the wiki

[John R. Dennison]

Someone made mention on IRC earlier of a reference to rpmforge on the
wiki and it got me thinking (yeah, never a good thing)...

A quick search on the wiki itself shows a lot_of references to
rpmforge.  As this is a dead project and has been a dead project for 3+
years now it would be quite useful to the consumers of the wiki material
for those references to be removed and replaced with something that is
trusted, epel for example.

I mentioned it to Christoph Galuschka and it was decided to bring this
matter up here.

Again, rpmforge is a dead project and any hope of it coming back is just
a pipedream.  References to it as a resource are a disservice to wiki
users.





John
-- 
We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable; that all men are created
equal and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights
inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

-- Thomas Jefferson, (1743 - 1826), draft of the Declaration of Independence,
   21 June 1776


pgpcPzTD0uyxo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs