Hi Paul, I use Xen 3.4.2 in production on Centos with Windows 2003 server virtual machines using those GPL PV drivers. I put it into production in March this year I think.
The only stability problems I’ve had has been because my Xen servers are using an NFS root from an at times overloaded NFS server. Thanks, Evan. Evan Fraser Senior Systems Analyst Peninsular House, 30 Monument Street London EC3R 8NB, United Kingdom Tel +44 20 7444 7860 Mobile +44 75 9024 5788 evan.fra...@rms.com www.rms.com From: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Paul Piscuc Sent: 16 December 2010 09:01 To: centos-virt@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-virt] Xen version Hi, We are thinking of using CentOS with XEN in production, but we are facing some issues regarding the 3.0.3 version of the xen hypervisor and windows paravirtualization. The drivers we are using are from here (http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenWindowsGplPv). The solution we found is upgrading to xen 3.4.2, using a strange repository (gitco.de<http://gitco.de>), and everything seems to work. Now the question is: would you recomand using the 3.0.3 kernel provided by CentOS in production and searching for other paravirtualization drivers, or go with 3.4.2? Is this version of the hypervisor stable? ________________________________ This message and any attachments contain information that may be RMS Inc. confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), and have received this message in error, any use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the e-mail and permanently deleting the message from your computer and/or storage system.
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
