Re: [CentOS-virt] libvirt versions / difference to upstream?
On 04/22/2014 04:59 AM, Sven Kieske wrote: > Hi, > > I want to upgrade my libvirt version, in order > to get a bugfix from upstream, see this BZ > for details: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084477 > > in short: libvirt does not handle qos > correctly prior to version 0.10.2-33.el6 > > however, it is not (yet?) available in CentOS. > The latest available package seems to be: > libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.7.x86_64 > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. > Is it just the versioning scheme that differs > between CentOS and upstream? > > Or did the new rpm just not hit > the repo yet? > > Thanks in advance! > > PS: This is CentOS 6.5 Yes, that version is not yet released by Red Hat for RHEL ... the bug status is "Verified in QA", not released. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] AWS Images updated for new instance types
On 04/22/2014 07:04 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > I know in irc you mentioned that the images had been updated in > amazon. I do see that there is a 6.5 AMI now. This is great but we had > discussed[1] possibly having a CentOS blessed AMI that contains > cloud-init from epel. I gave the 6.5 AMI a spin and I don't see > cloud-init. > > Is an image with cloud-init still part of the plan? > I believe so, this is part of the CCIS setup now though - and were slowly getting started up. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] AWS Images updated for new instance types
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > On Mar 11, 2014 1:37 PM, "Karanbir Singh" wrote: > >> > >> I've been working with the epel guys to bring that through - in the > >> coming days, I will have the infra up to test and build / deliver these > >> images. And at that point we can go ahead and start churning more > >> community oriented builds and scripts that go with them ( as opposed to > >> the official release process via AMP ). > >> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. Let me know if I can do anything to help. > > I haven't noticed any changes on http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS. Is > this progressing? I know you have been busy. Thanks for everything you > do. Karanbir, I know in irc you mentioned that the images had been updated in amazon. I do see that there is a 6.5 AMI now. This is great but we had discussed[1] possibly having a CentOS blessed AMI that contains cloud-init from epel. I gave the 6.5 AMI a spin and I don't see cloud-init. Is an image with cloud-init still part of the plan? Thanks for everything! Dusty [1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2014-March/003690.html ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Virt SIG roadmap
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:53 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > As promised, in preparation for next week's SIG meeting, here's a > kick-off discussion about the Virtualization SIG roadmap. > > I'm mainly tossing out ideas here -- see this is an invitation to > discussion. > > Key things I think should be on the roadmap: > > * Release process > - General cadence > - Estimate of the next release (if any) > * Specification of targets > - Right now, mainly xen4centos > - What packages? > * "Backlog" of work items > - Updates (mostly suggested by Pasi) > - Items caveats from Russ P's CentOS talk > > == Release process == > > I don't have any real opinions on this -- KB / Johnny, did you guys > have a vision for what the release schedule for any of the SIGs would > look like? Are we going to have specific releases, or just continue > to do rolling updates? If so, how frequent should the updates be? > > Obviously estimates for releases will need to wait until all the > infrastructure has been set up, and we've discussed cadence / targets, > &c. > > == Targets == > > Targets will depend on community support. I'll be committing to > extending the Xen4CentOS project. There was talk of having an OpenVZ > variant, but that would require someone to actually step up and do the > work to integrate and support it. > > == Backlog == > > Most of the items below are from the discussion Pasi started in > February; a couple are from Russ Pavliczek's slides at a talk given > recently. > > * Pull in updates f/ XenServer > > Suggested by dvrabel in http://marc.info/?l=centos-virt&m=139289353315469 > - 0001-x86-xen-rename-early_p2m_alloc-and-early_p2m_alloc_m.patch > - 0008-x86-remove-the-Xen-specific-_PAGE_IOMAP-PTE-flag.patch > - 0160676bba69523e8b0ac83f306cce7d342ed7c8 (xen/p2m: check MFN is in range > before using the m2p table) > - 7cde9b27e7b3a2e09d647bb4f6d94e842698d2d5 (xen: Fix possible user space > selector corruption) > * Xen 4.4 (Xen + qemu) > * libvirt: 1.2.2 > - Possibly with migration / pci pass-through back-ported? > * dom0 / xen serial console > * Ballooning bug? > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6893 > * UEFI? > > > Anything else we need to discuss / plan? At our bi-weekly meeting today, we talked about what the general approach to releases has been. For Xen, major updates to packages will happen when the upstream releases. The plan at the moment is to do this every other release; so we would update to 4.4, but probably not update again until 4.5. Between those times, we will generaly be pulling in bug fixes by consuming point releases when they happen. Security updates will of course be pushed out immediately, as will bugs that affect a significant number of users. We didn't discuss this, but I would expect that libvirt might be similar to Xen. For Linux, the plan is to consume one of the LTS kernels. At the moment, that's 3.10. In general, the plan is to update to a new LTS kernel every 2 years. However, whenever there is a major release (for example, with RHEL 7 coming out soon), we may consider moving to a newer kernel for CentOS 6 sooner, so that the Virt SIG can maintain only a single kernel version across all CentOS releases. The initial target for the Virt SIG will be to update the packages inherited from xen4centos to Xen 4.4 and libvirt 1.2.2. We're currently in the process of brainstorming a "backlog" of work items that might be a good idea. Some things we've come up with so far: * CentOS 7 testing branch * Making a useful Xen CD image - Live CD? - With pre-made CentOS guest images? - Ready to be set up as an OpenStack node? * Getting some kind of automated testing infrastructure set up KB / Lars / Johnny, anything I missed / didn't get quite right? -George ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-virt] libvirt versions / difference to upstream?
Hi, I want to upgrade my libvirt version, in order to get a bugfix from upstream, see this BZ for details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084477 in short: libvirt does not handle qos correctly prior to version 0.10.2-33.el6 however, it is not (yet?) available in CentOS. The latest available package seems to be: libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.7.x86_64 Please correct me if I'm wrong. Is it just the versioning scheme that differs between CentOS and upstream? Or did the new rpm just not hit the repo yet? Thanks in advance! PS: This is CentOS 6.5 -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
