Re: [CentOS-virt] Useless use of AllowOverride
I'm going to chime in, hoping that you won't waste everyone's time with your stupidity in the future: What does this *warning* have to do with virtualization? Ease up there tough guy. We were all rookies once. Encouraging people like this will help you/us because the world will be smarter. -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Useless use of AllowOverride
[Wed Apr 14 01:47:58 2010] [warn] Useless use of AllowOverride in line 31 of /home/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf. [Wed Apr 14 01:47:58 2010] [warn] Useless use of AllowOverride in line 36 of /home/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf. I suggest your search proceed in the following order. Usually, 1. will be your answer, but rarely 4. 1. Using a search engine to try to figure it out. 2. Read the documents (AllowOverride in Apache for sure, ,but probably Tomcat in your case too.) 3. Search the mailing list archives at Apached. 4. Send an email to the apache mailing list. -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Useless use of AllowOverride
Christopher G. Stach II wrote: - John Thomasgmane-2006-04...@jt-socal.com wrote: I'm going to chime in, hoping that you won't waste everyone's time with your stupidity in the future: What does this *warning* have to do with virtualization? Ease up there tough guy. We were all rookies once. Encouraging people like this will help you/us because the world will be smarter. It's 2010. That's not a valid excuse anymore. What if he were born in '98? -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Useless use of AllowOverride
Christopher G. Stach II wrote: Aww, you're so sweet. Maybe there are some girls on the list you can impress with your unbounded kindness. Who says it's not the right way? Since we're going to start fielding off topic questions to waste everyone's time on a focused list, can you tell me why my foot hurts? I mean, I was just using it normally, like a foot. But now it hurts. Could it be cancer? Fungus? Maybe we can turn CentOS into a foot pain site and extend off topic threads instead of just letting them die after short and quick re-educations that anyone subscribing to a mailing list should be aware of by now. Maybe if all of you tarts who are in such an uproar about this used your time to contribute anything substantial, or anything at all (Luke, Nenad, John), you would have something. Since all of you are just consumers and none of you actually participate in any way other than to complain that someone was rude, STFU. In the meantime, maybe you should join a Ruby dev list with all of your happiness and smiles. Together, you can change the world! May I suggest you include a link to this conversation in your web site and resume. Since you have all these skills in dealing with people, you certainly should not force your perspective employers or employees to use a search engine to find this. -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-virt] kernel-vm - humble request
Look, I pay nothing for an incredible operating system with enormous features and stability, so it feels a bit awkward asking for more. [Sarcasm On] Now, get going and build me up a 5.3 kernel-vm's would ya? ;) [Sarcasm Off} -- Humbly, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] firewall best practice on dom-0
Kai Schaetzl wrote: What's best practice on Dom-0, what do you do? Can I restrict the forwarding, in which way? I use vmware, not XEN, but I think everything is the same, as if you have physical machines. I use shorewall everywhere and find it great. http://shorewall.net rpms: http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/shorewall/ HTH -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] VMWare - 5.2 Update - Kernel Best Practices
Johnny Hughes wrote: One thing to make sure of if your clock is running fast is to get the correct setting for this in your vmx file for the VM: host.cpukHz = See this link for more info: http://blog.autoedification.com/2006/11/vmware-guest-clock-runs-fast.html I suspect (please clarify if I am wrong) you mean the /etc/vmware/config file, not the vmx file. The blog article suggests /etc/vmware/config. Note: if you do not have the command cpufreq-info you can get it by installing cpufreq-utils with this command: yum install cpufreq-utils After installing cpufreq-utils, cpufreq-info produced, no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU. I, through the notes in the above blog article, found /proc/cpuinfo had this: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping: 1 cpu MHz : 2995.211 cache size : 1024 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc up pni monitor ds_cpl cid xtpr bogomips: 5992.20 Then set the value based on the above article, then time might not run as fast. I am not sure if I should use: host.cpukHz = 300 or host.cpukHz = 2995211 I have tried both. Neither seems to work. My current solution, is to run a script once per hour that pauses for two seconds, then sets the clock back one second. The vmware time sync brings the guest clock current if it gets behind from the script. Are you able to think deep enough to figure out if I should set the host.cpukHz above or below the above range to see if that would slow down the guest clock? I wonder if I should even try that. Thanks, Johnny Hughes Thank you Johnny. I very much appreciate your time. -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-virt] VMWare - 5.2 Update - Kernel Best Practices
Thanks for all the great stuff. Executive Summary: Kernel Parameters or Special Kernel for 5.2 on VMWare? More Details: Is it the best practice to use the specially compiled kernels (when available, typically here: http://people.centos.org/~tru/kernel-vm/5/RPMS/i386/ ) or are kernel parameters now able to achieve the same thing? This bug report: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 seems to suggest clocksource=pit and divider=10 will crash kernels and I did not see it's fixed in the release notes. Thanks again! -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] VMWare - 5.2 Update - Kernel Best Practices
David Hollis wrote: Is there any detail on when you would actually need to use the clocksource= option? I'd love to not have to deal with the kernel-vm packages since there doesn't appear to be a repo for them yet and if you have other requirements like kmod-drbd you have to manually rebuild those. I use clocksource=pit because my VM clocks ran WAY fast without it. They still run a bit fast (1 second per 6 hours type of thing). If you do not use a clocksource option, how are your clocks? -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-virt] VMWare Server -- Which Kernel is Best
I read http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 Summary: CentOS is not getting optimal performance in a virtualized environment and on slow cpus but I am not sure I understand the current best practice. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Options as I see them: 1. Run kernel-vm-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 with clocksource=pit until the excellent CentOS team builds the latest kernel into a VM kernel (This is working for me now). 2. Run kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 with divider=10 and hope the clock does not go fast (I have not tried this). -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
