RE: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>now might be a good time to work out how the CentOS and the entire EL
>setups work and how backports and security fix's are done. There is
>plenty of info out there to look at starting from the wiki to the redhat
>website.
>
>--
>Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks for the recommended reading, good info. I see that Xen 3.0.3 is now 3.1 
actually (Backporting is obviously a good thing but at the risk of confusing 
things...). I see an errata listed as "network-bridge fails on some machines" 
which is my issue, I earlier had thought it was an installation issue but I 
ended up having Xen work in my preferred setup config on a different machine, 
so my dependency assumption was clearly wrong. The bug was last updated on 
2007-11-07, but using yum to install Xen as I always have been does fetch me 
the versions of the rpm's that this bug report list: xen-3.0.3-41.el5.i386.rpm.

Obviously I don't know for sure if this is my issue but when I run the Xen 
script to stop the bridged network, the server regains network connectivity so 
I will venture to say it appears related or very similar to me:)

Thanks for all the advice on this matter Karanbir,
jlc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Karanbir Singh
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> rpm -qa
>>
>> will tell you what all is installed on the machine at the moment, or
>> 'yum list installed'
> 
> Just figured that out! I will re-install my way and then without modifying 
> anything and run this command before and after installing Xen.
> 
>> also, w.r.t your other question on the centos list, xen in centos-5.1 is
>> already xen-3.1
> 
> I have only been using CentOS 5.1 and it wants to install Xen 3.0.3. Does 3.1 
> maybe exist in a different repo?
> I haven't enabled any other repo's.

now might be a good time to work out how the CentOS and the entire EL
setups work and how backports and security fix's are done. There is
plenty of info out there to look at starting from the wiki to the redhat
website.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


RE: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>rpm -qa
>
>will tell you what all is installed on the machine at the moment, or
>'yum list installed'

Just figured that out! I will re-install my way and then without modifying 
anything and run this command before and after installing Xen.

>also, w.r.t your other question on the centos list, xen in centos-5.1 is
>already xen-3.1

I have only been using CentOS 5.1 and it wants to install Xen 3.0.3. Does 3.1 
maybe exist in a different repo?
I haven't enabled any other repo's.

Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Karanbir Singh
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> post a rpmlist diff. we can then take it from there
> 
> Karanbir,
> I appreciate the help, but you have to bear with me as I have to figure how 
> to do that. I'll post back once I have that figured out!
> 

rpm -qa

will tell you what all is installed on the machine at the moment, or
'yum list installed'


also, w.r.t your other question on the centos list, xen in centos-5.1 is
already xen-3.1

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


RE: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>post a rpmlist diff. we can then take it from there

Karanbir,
I appreciate the help, but you have to bear with me as I have to figure how to 
do that. I'll post back once I have that figured out!

Appreciate the help,
jlc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Karanbir Singh

Joseph L. Casale wrote:

That just sounds like random testing, if you dont have the specifics on
what you consider to be a minimal install along with package lists, you
are not going to get anything that is reproduce able as a means to get
Xen working with minimal install.


Easy killer, I am documenting what I choose to install versus not, it's hardly 
random. Two installs done one with my stuff checked and a #yum install xen 
(noted what was added) and another done without making any changes to the 
default install, then running #yum install xen (noted what was installed, it 
was the same) produced different results.


post a rpmlist diff. we can then take it from there

--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


RE: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>That just sounds like random testing, if you dont have the specifics on
>what you consider to be a minimal install along with package lists, you
>are not going to get anything that is reproduce able as a means to get
>Xen working with minimal install.

Easy killer, I am documenting what I choose to install versus not, it's hardly 
random. Two installs done one with my stuff checked and a #yum install xen 
(noted what was added) and another done without making any changes to the 
default install, then running #yum install xen (noted what was installed, it 
was the same) produced different results.

>All you are trying to do, my guess is, work out what is the
>minimal packageset required to get a functional Xen based virt setup in
>your environment.
>
>--
>Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exactly, I don't want sendmail and VoIP clients etc. I am assuming if I choose 
to manage all the guests manually I don't need a gui.

Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Karanbir Singh

Joseph L. Casale wrote:

I did attempt to see what's different, but the problem is the groupinstall 
appears to want to install X as well so I am lost to know what is really needed.


groupinstall is not the only yum group operation availalble..


Further testing allowed me to get a one machine to work after a bare install 
with simply a #yum install xen so I am obviously now wrong in my assessment. At 
this point I believe it to be a simple problem in the CentOS/RH package of Xen 
(Or Xen itself) as I did try a Fedora Core 8 install and the same behavior was 
now noted: Some machines function before and after, and some don't function 
after!


That just sounds like random testing, if you dont have the specifics on 
what you consider to be a minimal install along with package lists, you 
are not going to get anything that is reproduce able as a means to get 
Xen working with minimal install.



My Linux experience is far too new to allow me to troubleshoot through it, but 
considering the magnitude of machines I have tried I am shocked if this 
behavior is not exhibited with other people.


Well, I suggest you work out how rpm and yum works and how packages are 
handled. All you are trying to do, my guess is, work out what is the 
minimal packageset required to get a functional Xen based virt setup in 
your environment.


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


RE: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>you might want to start with a list of packages that groupinstall will
>get and the yum install wont get, then work back from there. at the very
>least you are going to need libvirt and things it needs to run.
>
>If you post a package diff list, we can pick through there perhaps ?
>
>--
>Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Karanbir,
I did attempt to see what's different, but the problem is the groupinstall 
appears to want to install X as well so I am lost to know what is really needed.

Further testing allowed me to get a one machine to work after a bare install 
with simply a #yum install xen so I am obviously now wrong in my assessment. At 
this point I believe it to be a simple problem in the CentOS/RH package of Xen 
(Or Xen itself) as I did try a Fedora Core 8 install and the same behavior was 
now noted: Some machines function before and after, and some don't function 
after!

My Linux experience is far too new to allow me to troubleshoot through it, but 
considering the magnitude of machines I have tried I am shocked if this 
behavior is not exhibited with other people.

Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] xen dependencies

2007-12-30 Thread Karanbir Singh

Joseph L. Casale wrote:
It appears that if I perform an install of CentOS 5.1 without changing 
*anything* in the options, then do a #yum groupinstall 'Virtualization' 
I can now get Xen to function in bridged mode (it has network 
connectivity). If I perform a minimal install, then #yum install xen 
xen-kernel, once I reboot I do not have network access to or from the 
box unless I switch to routed mode.



you might want to start with a list of packages that groupinstall will 
get and the yum install wont get, then work back from there. at the very 
least you are going to need libvirt and things it needs to run.


If you post a package diff list, we can pick through there perhaps ?

--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt