答复: 答复: hello, I am confused about a question of rbd

2015-07-23 Thread zhengbin.08...@h3c.com
From now I don't find any question, Understand it, thank you

-邮件原件-
发件人: Dan Mick [mailto:dm...@redhat.com] 
发送时间: 2015年7月24日 9:21
收件人: zhengbin 08747 (RD); ceph-devel
主题: Re: 答复: hello, I am confused about a question of rbd

Adding back ceph-devel

My point was, ok, ruling out 0, then we can create a block device of size 1 
byte.  Is that useful?  No, it is not.  How about 10 bytes?
1000?  1MB?

There's no good reason to rule out zero.  Is it causing a problem somehow?

On 07/23/2015 06:06 PM, zhengbin.08...@h3c.com wrote:
> If I create a block whose size is zero, it means you absolutely can 
> not use it unless you resize it
> 
> 
> what arbitrary minimum size is too small?  -> I do not know, If I create 
> a block whose size is larger than zero,it may be can use.
> And why do we have to define a minimum size? we can just make sure the 
> block size is larger than zero
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Dan Mick [mailto:dm...@redhat.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年7月24日 5:25
> 收件人: Jason Dillaman; zhengbin 08747 (RD)
> 抄送: ceph-devel
> 主题: Re: hello, I am confused about a question of rbd
> 
> Why not zero?
> 
> If the answer is "it can't be used", then, what arbitrary minimum size is too 
> small?
> 
> (also, given that resize exists, it can be used for storage after a 
> resize.)
> 
> On 07/23/2015 06:03 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>> According to the git history, support for zero MB images for the 
>> create/resize commands was explicitly added by commit 08f47a4.  Dan Mick or 
>> Josh Durgin could probably better explain the history behind the change 
>> since it was before my time.
>>
> 
> --
> ---
> 本邮件及其附件含有杭州华三通信技术有限公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
> 的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
> 或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
> 邮件!
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from 
> H3C, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is 
> listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way 
> (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, 
> reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, 
> please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
> 

--
Dan Mick
Red Hat, Inc.
Ceph docs: http://ceph.com/docs
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w���
���j:+v���w�j�mzZ+�ݢj"��!�i

Re: 答复: hello, I am confused about a question of rbd

2015-07-23 Thread Dan Mick
Adding back ceph-devel

My point was, ok, ruling out 0, then we can create a block device of
size 1 byte.  Is that useful?  No, it is not.  How about 10 bytes?
1000?  1MB?

There's no good reason to rule out zero.  Is it causing a problem somehow?

On 07/23/2015 06:06 PM, zhengbin.08...@h3c.com wrote:
> If I create a block whose size is zero, it means you absolutely can not use 
> it unless you resize it
> 
> 
> what arbitrary minimum size is too small?  -> I do not know, If I create 
> a block whose size is larger than zero,it may be can use.
> And why do we have to define a minimum size? we can just make sure the block 
> size is larger than zero
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Dan Mick [mailto:dm...@redhat.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年7月24日 5:25
> 收件人: Jason Dillaman; zhengbin 08747 (RD)
> 抄送: ceph-devel
> 主题: Re: hello, I am confused about a question of rbd
> 
> Why not zero?
> 
> If the answer is "it can't be used", then, what arbitrary minimum size is too 
> small?
> 
> (also, given that resize exists, it can be used for storage after a resize.)
> 
> On 07/23/2015 06:03 AM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>> According to the git history, support for zero MB images for the 
>> create/resize commands was explicitly added by commit 08f47a4.  Dan Mick or 
>> Josh Durgin could probably better explain the history behind the change 
>> since it was before my time.
>>
> 
> -
> 本邮件及其附件含有杭州华三通信技术有限公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出
> 的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、
> 或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
> 邮件!
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from H3C, 
> which is
> intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use 
> of the
> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total 
> or partial
> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please 
> notify the sender
> by phone or email immediately and delete it!
> 

-- 
Dan Mick
Red Hat, Inc.
Ceph docs: http://ceph.com/docs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html