[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.13 pacific QE validation status

2023-05-07 Thread Yuri Weinstein
All PRs were cherry-picked and the new RC1 build is:

https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/pacific-release/8f93a58b82b94b6c9ac48277cc15bd48d4c0a902/

Rados, fs and rgw were rerun and results are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59542#note-1

Seeking final approvals:

rados - Radek
fs - Venky
rgw - Casey

On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 8:27 AM Yuri Weinstein  wrote:
>
> I got verbal approvals for the listed PRs:
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51232 -- Venky approved
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51344  -- Venky approved
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51200 -- Casey approved
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50894  -- Radek approved
>
> Suites rados and fs will need to be retested on updates pacific-release 
> branch.
>
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:13 AM Yuri Weinstein  wrote:
> >
> > In summary:
> >
> > Release Notes:  https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51301
> >
> > We plan to finish this release next week and we have the following PRs
> > planned to be added:
> >
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51232 -- Venky approved
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51344  -- Venky in progress
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51200 -- Casey approved
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50894  -- Radek in progress
> >
> > As soon as these PRs are finalized, I will cherry-pick them and
> > rebuild "pacific-release" and rerun appropriate suites.
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:07 AM Radoslaw Zarzynski  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > If we get some time, I would like to include:
> > >
> > >   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50894.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Radek
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 5:56 PM Venky Shankar  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Yuri,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:10 PM Venky Shankar  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:25 PM Yuri Weinstein  
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Venky, I did plan to cherry-pick this PR if you approve this (this 
> > > > > > PR
> > > > > > was used for a rerun)
> > > > >
> > > > > OK. The fs suite failure is being looked into
> > > > > (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59626).
> > > >
> > > > Fix is being tracked by
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51344
> > > >
> > > > Once ready, it needs to be included in 16.2.13 and would require a fs
> > > > suite re-run (although re-renning the failed tests should suffice,
> > > > however, I'm a bit inclined in putting it through the fs suite).
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 7:51 AM Venky Shankar  
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Yuri,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:53 AM Yuri Weinstein 
> > > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Details of this release are summarized here:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59542#note-1
> > > > > > > > Release Notes - TBD
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Seeking approvals for:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > smoke - Radek, Laura
> > > > > > > > rados - Radek, Laura
> > > > > > > >   rook - Sébastien Han
> > > > > > > >   cephadm - Adam K
> > > > > > > >   dashboard - Ernesto
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > rgw - Casey
> > > > > > > > rbd - Ilya
> > > > > > > > krbd - Ilya
> > > > > > > > fs - Venky, Patrick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are a couple of new failures which are qa/test related - 
> > > > > > > I'll
> > > > > > > have a look at those (they _do not_ look serious).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, Yuri, do you plan to merge
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51232
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > into the pacific-release branch although it's tagged with one of 
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > other pacific runs?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > upgrade/octopus-x (pacific) - Laura (look the same as in 16.2.8)
> > > > > > > > upgrade/pacific-p2p - Laura
> > > > > > > > powercycle - Brad (SELinux denials)
> > > > > > > > ceph-volume - Guillaume, Adam K
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thx
> > > > > > > > YuriW
> > > > > > > > ___
> > > > > > > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Venky
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Venky
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Venky
> > > > ___
> > > > Dev mailing list -- d...@ceph.io
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-le...@ceph.io
> > >
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io


[ceph-users] Testing to simulate real-world usage scenarios

2023-05-07 Thread Michal Strnad

Hi everyone,

how do you test features that are used by your users before 
updating/upgrading to a newer version of Ceph? For example, if you have 
users or customers using RBD images with special sets of 
permissions/caps, or users/customers using S3 with versioning... None of 
these should be broken by the new code.


Do you use any framework, set of scripts, or anything else? So far, I 
have only found Teuthology for integration tests and then for S3 
[https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests].


Thank you
Michal


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io