[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
Martin, Thanks for your reply. I watch your video in the website, and have a try with croit. It's a very good product at first sight. Much better than ceph's default dashboard. Good job :). On 3/8/22 2:26 PM, Martin Verges wrote: Some say it is, some say it's not. Every time I try it, it's buggy as hell and I can destroy my test clusters with ease. That's why I still avoid it. But as you can see in my signature, I am biased ;). -- Martin Verges Managing director Mobile: +49 174 9335695 | Chat: https://t.me/MartinVerges croit GmbH, Freseniusstr. 31h, 81247 Munich CEO: Martin Verges - VAT-ID: DE310638492 Com. register: Amtsgericht Munich HRB 231263 Web: https://croit.io | YouTube: https://goo.gl/PGE1Bx On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 05:18, norman.kern wrote: Dear Ceph folks, Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)？ I found several bugs on it and I really doubt it. ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
We use it without major issues, at this point. There are still flaws, but there are flaws in almost any deployment and management system, and this is not unique to cephadm. I agree with the general sentiment that you need to have some knowledge about containers, however. I don't think that's necessarily out of place with 2022, either. This most certainly has some upsides that (for us) offset the downsides in additional knowledge/complexity. We've significantly benefited from the ease of containerized deployments when dealing with debugging OSDs with custom containers without disturbing others on the same host, for example. There's a huge thread with all the discussion concerning containers if you search the archives; there's no point in repeating it again. On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:17 PM norman.kern wrote: > Dear Ceph folks, > > Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)？ I found several bugs > on it and > I really doubt it. > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
> > Can't imagine there is no reason. Anyway I think there is a general > misconception that using containers would make it easier for users. > > ceph = learn linux sysadmin + learn ceph > cephadm = learn linux sysadmin + learn ceph + learn containers > Oh forgot ;) croit ceph = learn nothing ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
> > We have an old ceph cluster, which is running fine without any problems > with cephadm and pacific (16.2.7) on Ubuntu (which was deployed without > using cephadm). > > Now, I am trying to setup one more cluster on CentOS Stream 8 with > cephadm, containers are killed or stopped for no reason. > Can't imagine there is no reason. Anyway I think there is a general misconception that using containers would make it easier for users. ceph = learn linux sysadmin + learn ceph cephadm = learn linux sysadmin + learn ceph + learn containers ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
We have an old ceph cluster, which is running fine without any problems with cephadm and pacific (16.2.7) on Ubuntu (which was deployed without using cephadm). Now, I am trying to setup one more cluster on CentOS Stream 8 with cephadm, containers are killed or stopped for no reason. On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 5:17 AM norman.kern wrote: > Dear Ceph folks, > > Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)？ I found several bugs > on it and > I really doubt it. > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > -- P *SAVE PAPER – Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary.* ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
Hi! I run cephadm-based 16.2.x cluster in production. It's been mostly fine, but not without quirks. Hope this helps. /Z On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:17 AM norman.kern wrote: > Dear Ceph folks, > > Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)？ I found several bugs > on it and > I really doubt it. > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
Some say it is, some say it's not. Every time I try it, it's buggy as hell and I can destroy my test clusters with ease. That's why I still avoid it. But as you can see in my signature, I am biased ;). -- Martin Verges Managing director Mobile: +49 174 9335695 | Chat: https://t.me/MartinVerges croit GmbH, Freseniusstr. 31h, 81247 Munich CEO: Martin Verges - VAT-ID: DE310638492 Com. register: Amtsgericht Munich HRB 231263 Web: https://croit.io | YouTube: https://goo.gl/PGE1Bx On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 05:18, norman.kern wrote: > Dear Ceph folks, > > Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)？ I found several bugs > on it and > I really doubt it. > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
