[ceph-users] Re: Using cloudbase windows RBD / wnbd with pre-pacific clusters

2022-09-20 Thread Lucian Petrut

Hi,

From what I recall, we did try a Pacific Windows client with a Nautilus 
cluster and it seemed to work fine. New Ceph versions might introduce 
non-backwards compatible changes, so I think the consensus is that it 
*might* work but it's not something that's being tested or supported.


Getting back to your error, we recently fixed some rbd deadlocks caused 
by a faulty mingw shared mutex implementation. We've just updated the 
MSIs [2], including other fixes as well. Please give it another try and 
let me know if the issue persists.


Regards,

Lucian

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47492

[2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47492

On 20.07.2022 18:41, Wesley Dillingham wrote:
I understand that the client side code available from cloudbase 
started being distributed with pacific and now quincy client code but 
is there any particular reason it shouldn't work in conjunction with a 
nautilus, for instance, cluster.


We have seen some errors when trying to do IO with mapped RBDs with 
the error:


The semaphore timeout period has expired.

Just trying to rule out the cluster version theory. Thanks.

Respectfully,

*Wes Dillingham*
w...@wesdillingham.com
LinkedIn 

___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io


[ceph-users] Re: Using cloudbase windows RBD / wnbd with pre-pacific clusters

2022-09-20 Thread Lucian Petrut
Whops, wrong paste. Here's the actual Ceph MSI link: 
https://cloudbase.it/ceph-for-windows/


Regards,

Lucian

On 20.09.2022 12:11, Lucian Petrut wrote:

Hi,

From what I recall, we did try a Pacific Windows client with a 
Nautilus cluster and it seemed to work fine. New Ceph versions might 
introduce non-backwards compatible changes, so I think the consensus 
is that it *might* work but it's not something that's being tested or 
supported.


Getting back to your error, we recently fixed some rbd deadlocks 
caused by a faulty mingw shared mutex implementation. We've just 
updated the MSIs [2], including other fixes as well. Please give it 
another try and let me know if the issue persists.


Regards,

Lucian

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47492

[2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47492

On 20.07.2022 18:41, Wesley Dillingham wrote:
I understand that the client side code available from cloudbase 
started being distributed with pacific and now quincy client code but 
is there any particular reason it shouldn't work in conjunction with 
a nautilus, for instance, cluster.


We have seen some errors when trying to do IO with mapped RBDs with 
the error:


The semaphore timeout period has expired.

Just trying to rule out the cluster version theory. Thanks.

Respectfully,

*Wes Dillingham*
w...@wesdillingham.com
LinkedIn 

___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io