Re: [ceph-users] RadosGW not working after upgrade to Hammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Arnoud On 26/05/15 16:53, Arnoud de Jonge wrote: > Hi, [...] > > 2015-05-26 17:43:37.352569 7f0fce0ff840 0 ceph version 0.94.1 > (e4bfad3a3c51054df7e537a724c8d0bf9be972ff), process radosgw, pid > 4259 2015-05-26 17:43:37.435921 7f0f8a4f2700 0 ERROR: can't get > key: ret=-2 2015-05-26 17:43:37.435932 7f0f8a4f2700 0 ERROR: > sync_all_users() returned ret=-2 2015-05-26 17:43:37.436179 > 7f0fce0ff840 0 framework: fastcgi 2015-05-26 17:43:37.436191 > 7f0fce0ff840 0 framework: civetweb 2015-05-26 17:43:37.436198 > 7f0fce0ff840 0 framework conf key: port, val: 7480 2015-05-26 > 17:43:37.436208 7f0fce0ff840 0 starting handler: civetweb > 2015-05-26 17:43:37.453013 7f0fce0ff840 0 starting handler: > fastcgi 2015-05-26 17:43:41.347403 7f0d487a0700 1 == starting > new request req=0x7f0d7c011590 = 2015-05-26 17:43:41.498851 > 7f0d487a0700 0 validated token: openstack:admin expires: > 1432658621 2015-05-26 17:43:41.509877 7f0d487a0700 0 ERROR: could > not get stats for buckets 2015-05-26 17:43:41.509943 7f0d487a0700 > 1 == req done req=0x7f0d7c011590 http_status=400 == > 2015-05-26 17:43:44.140730 7f0d897fa700 1 == starting new > request req=0x7f0d7c0162e0 = 2015-05-26 17:43:44.285039 > 7f0d897fa700 0 validated token: openstack:admin expires: > 1432658624 2015-05-26 17:43:44.290175 7f0d897fa700 0 ERROR: could > not get stats for buckets 2015-05-26 17:43:44.290222 7f0d897fa700 > 1 == req done req=0x7f0d7c0162e0 http_status=400 == > 2015-05-26 17:43:46.972310 7f0d77fff700 1 == starting new > request req=0x7f0d7c016270 = 2015-05-26 17:43:47.121784 > 7f0d77fff700 0 validated token: openstack:admin expires: > 1432658626 2015-05-26 17:43:47.125191 7f0d77fff700 0 ERROR: could > not get stats for buckets 2015-05-26 17:43:47.125241 7f0d77fff700 > 1 == req done req=0x7f0d7c016270 http_status=400 == I just debugged what I think is the same problem in one of our clusters; the Gateway was working fine for a bit, but then started throwing this error. Turned out the back-end mon and osd daemons had not been restarted so where still running firefly code - if you're running on Ubuntu, the packaging won't restart daemons automatically - it has to be done manually post upgrade (so you can co-ordinate it across your clusters). Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV8qWSAAoJEL/srsug59jDHasP+weu5D7P5DR4zbRxdvGXw8DR RWkI2oo4FSB5QYeVBR5NbCOBKQivUoDKs8wcldD7rRLBwNuxxkacrpoBviKHJkZF XYya8ZGufIX4RTseF9F3qGoJnA5rxCrTPojcB8KGRlXMFutswnv5sgS11J3OlSZn QG4bB/oW9Cmdw3slxc/Poe3UdxQxgTfyXIoj9eiUWNcCZtbElcggF+EFiN47EneG mA8kRIZY7ofhl3Lr1AGvXffK/4tjgpeWmPnCPIZlzuigmxbTWvwBjDk2H3gt0C2f l3vUi1fT2NRslR4v+4MJuI9JtxhKNCaX3QjU5vNVJkRV11nd2RYw+a+YQNBPqEbQ TstCLDBg2rAnPHpPduqsb+tujx8+p7SHNcgMHPJpxkeZ96XPts0Qxhr8M3i++MlM blZvRYyRf3KDsWRG7kq65msFGPW9H4eWP4gmCP02Uy3VJ1LtawpypAX0Elq+SC8a wWRV4GyVEv1tpNyP7gSqBIGhHRthODXQFii6TYJNvN2YpRWiO1XTMUvooNaH/kg5 /P42QUifQ7K2XjVaB9yFQLH4TkQkYjiHY3ro/DxARpVtb41M3yJinCSJaHlgWArc pDlJm4mz6lRVIo6evTJsqOLoe0cew/+m+atlfuucTM3+SVONSCay9H56wB/Z3/VG ZTlm19gjHjp6Rpwi401i =Nfh4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Heads up: libvirt produces unusable images from RBD pool on Ubuntu trusty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Florian On 22/04/15 11:07, Florian Haas wrote: > Further information: Original Red Hat BZ: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092208 Bug I just > added to Launchpad so the Ubuntu folks (hopefully) backport the > patch for trusty-updates: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1447030 Bug noted and libvirt maintainer on the server team poked accordingly. Things are a little frenetic this week with the 15.04 release going out tomorrow but I got a 'i can get to it after some plates stop spinning ;)'. Nice spot - and this is not the first time I've seen a bug due to incorrect specification of the stripe size for rbd images. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVN6JcAAoJEL/srsug59jDducP/3jSF024/6S5gte9W61+HP5t 13BdRn/+eRGOgNLJi+5uA1JXV2gOPKYPCKNK1aOG+ikMtgrl+L6dStQII21i5CEe 5GPJD/nTmwDRbt9idW+TMCxS03Admr8TJhE+usaNhgn3pxGUlRseBkd+BcniyXVR kD8VK/uDaqLny94JO93BdzfcndvP5YMzbesqZCxrctM+A1kA9cxD2F4ZdLoUV9Eg hcCPvZUYJp+MCLGHfkkDNr67feqyFRmab9Adm3pMs2UDdX5pReyUpAfF1YRlyKDu bJejJQzb7OlTHW3hEtpawq/iG0197P7wfkzNQa4tMDYhysYyQ4OJzUIpir5nU63p 6sJDW7PvlG62Di9koBvRoXZpIfJiRiOl3iCvx3yfhFSeWGFT7tz9Zy+4SfDMQLyh F3tegwE2gBvRwArL4tp3H1Uue3mPRXkBQJt0Ic2EXgCwRZ3G1g0xpTD0HXoS+cpx BsL57fKa8oOnTjk6xegfiStHkxk0BxnjV20rpeCMYjiABspG+zs59a/JiLE+Md5a k+CsSEA79HT0TtKWKe/ZCB+BR5BUW7iEl95zcZM1oFsaHPE7bEjVzvdoxgfwQdRd tyOSKto+l/bWXrszmh+kVwhTfqnhHUqORBO3Uw5HyAgTvTiMtpFnELlf2giguI/+ sNzd9TY5mX+wRk0xTy3O =JluA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Packages for Debian jessie, Ubuntu vivid etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 22/04/15 11:44, Florian Haas wrote: >> Would it be possible to have at least firefly, giant and hammer >> built >>> for the aforementioned distros? > jftr, packages for saucy and trusty *are* available: > > http://ceph.com/debian-hammer/dists/ > http://ceph.com/debian-giant/dists/ > http://ceph.com/debian-firefly/dists/ > > We're running a cluster on trusty ourselves. But, granted, no > utopic, vivid or jessie support (except from Debian/Ubuntu > themselves, but they're of course on firefly at this time). trusty and utopic are firefly (0.80.9). vivid is hammer (0.94.1) - this is also available for trusty via the Kilo Cloud Archive - see [0]. [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVN6OYAAoJEL/srsug59jDYcwP/jXpQiLTH8LTbjf7rLrPNfih ff8RNZZJvUMBiDmx3D1wgo40oMOQDM4EHwdSa0VoFdcIpIv1qEXaU3aiJeni6iHU 3214Wwi69dAhWZLHSNYh5MpHVxF2ck6ip+1/Lj8Io5mHBeOfSL2/bcfCc5AlYp52 fV6EfFrYA7Npb5th9+9WTOdAj/lnAq8Jdjkjkf8WJrBUxxol6lS6RctxFkfL/j0I jkJbMZttgSUurB8vVTgrDlGfEnNz/5wbX1FN6mDVvWKVQa/a4s5KqVleoBUy9S2T G1jwjyTQWiZKJTgxvBjjf7KmT+gCnWT6IlphidyRvJ2BcE2KqbXnV5qclBtHAtEE A0GZgBa61x5YqJkaW/C4VKDT3xF5A9xsxdMK4H+JtZ3XOWPB5GC7SuP7wFKPUGB2 yC4yRh26u+eZ5JGJwLnqQvIJ18Dha/Dd1tF2PrY9bi2OtgUhOjhUbHNqAbcCDDD+ GoFxVhv7t+JFPImrQpB0REGEJ4ACBiJFOAEdko4AOV2unjOBz46gjEvuEedzhMcp xF7yMlx0BlwqKPrMJlBp35EhkA1IUL4pgQrioWWKxnvXWE+pP3PSEDFiR6610aFZ rm/pUCE4Rx99KYfhztmll6QfDtv3ZKfLV0QRNPk31yVZJufauyr9OluT/ioWFFmJ mC9lHyw5cyAKrU84k2zp =IIB7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] ceph for ubuntu 16.04
Hi On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 at 08:04 Robertz C. wrote: > Hi members, > > Ubuntu 16.04 will get released soon. > I want to make sure that, will ceph integrated with the new ubuntu > system work fine in production environment? > Do you have any suggestion on this? The ceph packages in Ubuntu 16.04 itself (currently 10.0.3 - target is for Jewel to be included) work just fine - I've been testing Ceph on Ubuntu 16.04 for the last few months with systemd integration. Any fixes I've done have gone back into the ceph repositories as well - I think there was only one pertinent to the systemd integration Cheers James ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
Hi On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 at 16:39 hp cre wrote: > Hello all, > > I was just installing jewel 10.1.0 on ubuntu xenial beta 2. > I got an error when trying to create a mon about failure to find command > 'initctl' which is in upstart. > Tried to install upstart, then got an error 'com.ubuntu...' not found. > > Anyway, i thought that with jewel release it would support systemd on > ubuntu xenial like it said in the release notes?! > I've been working with the systemd support in the Jewel release and its working OK for me - how are you trying to create your mon? I'm wondering whether its your deployment process rather than the ceph packages that have a problem here. Cheers James ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 10:02 hp cre wrote: > Hello James, > > It's a default install of xenial server beta 2 release. Created a user > then followed the ceph installation quick start exactly as it is. > > Ceph-deploy version 1.5.31 was used as follows > > 1- ceph-deploy new node1 > 2- ceph-deploy install --release jewel node1 > 3- ceph-deploy mon create-initial > > Step 3 gave error in Python scripts. Meaning it could not find initctl > command. Searched for this command and found out our belongs to upstart. > I suspect that ceph-deploy is not playing nicely with systemd based Ubuntu releases - I'll take a look now.. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
It would be handy to get visibility of your deployment log data; I'm not currently able to reproduce your issue deploying ceph using ceph-deploy on a small three node install running xenial - its correctly detecting systemd and using systemctl instead of initctl. On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 10:18 James Page wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 10:02 hp cre wrote: > >> Hello James, >> >> It's a default install of xenial server beta 2 release. Created a user >> then followed the ceph installation quick start exactly as it is. >> >> Ceph-deploy version 1.5.31 was used as follows >> >> 1- ceph-deploy new node1 >> 2- ceph-deploy install --release jewel node1 >> 3- ceph-deploy mon create-initial >> >> Step 3 gave error in Python scripts. Meaning it could not find initctl >> command. Searched for this command and found out our belongs to upstart. >> > I suspect that ceph-deploy is not playing nicely with systemd based Ubuntu > releases - I'll take a look now.. > ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 21:35 hp cre wrote: > I wanted to try the latest ceph-deploy. Thats why i downloaded this > version (31). Latest ubuntu version is (20). > > I tried today at the end of the failed attempt to uninstall this version > and install the one that came with xenial, but whatever i did, it always > defaulted to version 31. Maybe someone already upgraded xenial repository > to use version 31 instead of 20. > Yup that was me.. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
Hello On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 22:08 hp cre wrote: > Hey James, > Did you check my steps? What did you do differently and worked for your? > Your steps look OK to me; I did pretty much the same, but with three nodes instead on a single node - but I'm scratching my head as to why I don't see the same as you do > ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
OK - so my test was with the master branch of ceph-deploy which does work correctly - specifically: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy/commit/b796a45b119afb9186301a868c25a9ba70642891 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy/commit/374088665e43654e97512ab40f2cc141e238f21c are post .31 so only the basic check is in the current released version. I'll request that a new release is made - in the meantime I'll pick both of those commits into the Xenial ceph-deploy package. On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:53 hp cre wrote: > To answer Oliver's question, a standard ubuntu server install is just an > iso of the server being installed in an automated mode. no software > specific options are made except in tasksel, i choose openssh server only. > > On 13 April 2016 at 10:49, hp cre wrote: > >> I'll give it one more try. >> >> I tried to inspect and follow the code for ceph-deploy, though i'm no >> python developer. >> It seems that in hosts/debian/__init__.py, line number 20, that if >> distro.lower == ubuntu then it will return upstart. >> >> maybe thats the problem ? >> >> On 13 April 2016 at 10:19, James Page wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 22:08 hp cre wrote: >>> >>>> Hey James, >>>> Did you check my steps? What did you do differently and worked for >>>> your? >>>> >>> >>> Your steps look OK to me; I did pretty much the same, but with three >>> nodes instead on a single node - but I'm scratching my head as to why I >>> don't see the same as you do >>> >>> >>>> >> > ___ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre wrote: > I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the one you updated in > the ubuntu repo. > It seems that these commits were not "commited" in version .31 ? > Yes - they post-date the .31 release; a patched version of .31 should be in Xenial shortly. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd
Patched up version is now in Xenial - Alfredo is looking to produce a new release soon... On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 13:00 hp cre wrote: > fyi, i tested ceph-deploy master branch and it worked fine. > > On 13 April 2016 at 11:28, hp cre wrote: > >> Great! Please let me know when the patched version is up. >> >> Thanks for your help, much appreciated. >> >> On 13 April 2016 at 11:19, James Page wrote: >> >>> n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre wrote: >>> >>>> I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the one you updated >>>> in the ubuntu repo. >>>> It seems that these commits were not "commited" in version .31 ? >>>> >>> >>> Yes - they post-date the .31 release; a patched version of .31 should be >>> in Xenial shortly. >>> >> >> > ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] 1 particular ceph-mon never jobs on 0.67.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 26/08/13 19:31, Sage Weil wrote: >>> I'm wondering what kind of delay, or additional "start-on" >>> logic I can add to the upstart script to work around this. > Hmm, this is beyond my upstart-fu, unfortunately. This has come up > before, actually. Previously we would wait for any interface to > come up and then start, but that broke with multi-nic machines, and > I ended up just making things start in runlevel [2345]. > > James, do you know what should be done to make the job wait for > *all* network interfaces to be up? Is that even the right solution > here? This is actually really tricky; runlevel [2345] should cover most use cases as this will ensure that interfaces configured in /etc/network/interfaces. But it sounds like that might not be the case; Travis - in your example are all network interfaces configured using /etc/network/interfaces? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSHG6KAAoJEL/srsug59jDHJ4P/RR0HOUC8awoKlH1f92GRqqa bOo/vszIY/4c2NhCTXRX3jWxBCexlNLlwYExsbX9hzP3DDOMzOMdXh2rMM9o3zaD 98z+o1jC+hUYf27UmK+ZbZGqr4Xh9bi07g6jF2/u3OmbCcxQUaRQdzDp4dbf1MK4 Q2iigJhLBSiZw+OX0+2210+7Cmz9lKKNeuuUcsqT0jdagPYJIQlIbA9v7aNzsxlI AmEShkCBoI9lzedyFsBIZ10gtMDrvBPJHyDf3VySW/ZhLlZeAnPhRZaZ/AkcrToX 1x6quQvheWyr52bbe0gnAAoIZUpLyCG0+Xkp9+jw11HWLTdGMsn3nMI7BUZ6MHrB 8rIdBGc9gxuKsZyqP/QRBVWDWjACHckjAl0ORJdeXkfm6ZmruRTEB2CNgXZF+Wl5 h0InmcdjMTIwgxV5wgJ4d6Lom45AKaTIumpBiGvmMjuVm08V0xftkPpNbpIsbbol fmmpqTlxJtVrsd1CZd1nN74z+EOgrCDRJg4bzSPVRjkYIJc6by3udLSRFlQfz5qd 8pm7PsbSEBEY873HPZMuxAMfXQKf/EMNZTq6bbrA61sgIXUEr/YFmG9EiA8ptnAp 1cy4zRgrnL1KI9rSrjKi19wFeYEn0HRLlPqlA8likUTaGbNpXppohpt7RyE1eA6t vdMkd1v47yZuNoEsEA8e =iLfL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] saucy salamander support?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 22/10/13 08:51, Mike Lowe wrote: > And a +1 from me as well. It would appear that ubuntu has picked > up the 0.67.4 source and included a build of it in their official > repo, so you may be able to get by until the next point release > with those. > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=ceph Ceph has been a fully supported part of every Ubuntu release since 12.04; Dumpling will be maintained for the life of Saucy and will receive point release updates as and when they are released. The packages are interchangeable with those from ceph.com (I try to keep things in sync as much as possible) so should work OK with ceph-deploy. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSaBliAAoJEL/srsug59jDv+gP/0jEZo+hndnmrewxc459FlvV bucfEoCBocFi3lDWjroMX4zmtVC06poJ3poR8QAIIdspaA2PD3u4UcbvANK9Ft/b TVaw+MYuVmq2wohX7okAI4sma4JVadsamIYvpO4qJlEJ3QYvWtl77s+N2P0qcG6/ RJtyhIGCEVggMmBp4vEyL4NP73q9ddXJS5a9usKpCKbWe/75vZUZ+GaWN4FDi6Ja Q+6FPY35cJAk2kvhP1bXDvKutFH/0ZjuyDP1ReEiGDNb9eyQxEiSLGZnq97/7gOd 1ORgFbpFeficonsPhYanCHm6Ce6bmYKRLgoqIEpY17p52RbF6z+kfsmguATJ5IEI V7/6dSYoYaNl5VuaGQ8+z+KvkaW6SDMSgYBWQEY0EFbFrND244xDCp3/0gmgc59h i6yW+WJbj8Li4KY2Ah58NZLBpCyE+qKAzXorl6F3OhCgapBvqHjScMu0Brlsfskd vQVPOOa4fhS0obxJEK8IcwbfTC0OF0E4tuErJ8ipP1jKY1khDY6dFM9dzvGnbL9H 76uBB+pbA2j0wPbciEjzVzl8qdafSwOBEf9OCDDAJ17ZuQvGEFGbf8f1uPL1LDYQ 2HRBIUKFv4nGFwzlAIuYMxL0z9dibNqtKgq68MtBJd8WmmAe4/93nQv1KyLlzt4M fvjqETvQJW5NW6MkyyTu =qObf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] centos6.4 + libvirt + qemu + rbd/ceph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/12/13 22:56, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: >>> Most servers novadays are re-provisioned even more often, > Not where I work they aren't. > >>> Fedora release comes with more and more KVM/Libvirt features >>> and resolved issues, so the net effect is positive anyway. > Yes, that is the main argument for tracking ubuntu. ;) Just to back this up with a bit more detail - this was all enabled as part of the core Ubuntu distribution since 12.04; you can get up-to-date versions of all components either by using the latest interim release (13.10 for example) or using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with the Cloud Archive (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive). OpenStack + Ceph (which relies on all of those features) is something we test with for every upstream commit of OpenStack and for stable updates as well so it gets exercised *alot* *DISTRO PITCH OVER* Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSpaFrAAoJEL/srsug59jDmmcP/juaPVldO7x68fO5/EGJWF9f 0j6NUOkA/auPa/22DiN2AjvZ5KHwFtmXh/+KpEUlYgUylne8371a19DbGYsk4rro y53dYN4Iy5ww9Yo9/yO5BSEu9EWs6G2LuwJ9e5bkP24RC9GUZZzldt/yVMGKwyiE 8nj7cqTt7Jme82XQQQEs+pwYsgXAOz1YcTc8iv2WDyEdXywJJFusn+dWd3G5kPjl daIWrVur42RlQV39tAtJT0VyPwJ5MCSNDdzM3jN9EC9q+Y5QBVGMqobGFAaycJg2 08M65OknRuURBqzI4tuBRtOd/rrClXWrNUL8e9xBRpH8ysF0HbLKQuslV3uG1uSU YgEGp8e3eecoK/nkZHbcNS/RKQrKDWami6NPDu8zZbCwE0p8J81uJLoEznGY1whz r5gt8DoNOkvJC480L9h78yUqFyn8v9ibJnfP5DAn67KuT+zWVQuVH32gXHo1/6UI zX+86ithH9Sw+5LePERf7GDsuo40+z4cqjrnVR5PFkQ4hVtgDcA9NLGjmciNtEJf L9pq/ZrmCqzlwPKh9wq8o9FxdKgwwKj5XAMiwSfEkhxbFtQCh/QyO5JM/bFljF12 aYXeKAaEFZMmacbScqldEun39EpA9fQ5u61uiMA/mP89tU8wxTh1mn4dZxWOa+vv 31BKvlCCNzTBxzgYPbFE =AnG5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04, what's still on the TODO?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Wido On 11/12/13 13:31, Wido den Hollander wrote: > I was looking at the packages for Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04 LTSand I > noticed that currently Ceph 0.72 (Emperor) is packaged for Trusty > (codename)/ I keep ontop of the stable releases during the development cycle; we also have a minor release exception for Ceph which means I can push point releases as stable release updates. > Both Qemu (1.7) and libvirt (1.1.4) is compiled with librbd > support, so that's great. > > Is there anything else still missing that needs to be fixed for > Ubuntu 14.04? Things that come to mind: > > - tgt packages with rbd enabled? Done > - modfastcgi for Apache with 100-continue support? Tricky - when I last looked at this the consensus was that 100-continue support appeared to break general FastCGI compat - but it would be nice to look at this again. I'm also trying to get mod_fastcgi out of Ubuntu multiverse (due to a cause in the license which makes it non-free from Debian's perspective) but upstream are not that active so I'm not depending on that! > - btrfs fixes for in the kernel? If you have specific issues that you know of for the current 3.12 and final 3.13 kernels please highlight these to me - I can channel then through to the Ubuntu kernel team for review. > - RBD cache patches for Qemu? I'll defer to more knowledgeable folk but I *think* this is already enabled - but I may be wrong :-). > I know we are still ~5 months away from the LTS release, but since > it's going to be the next LTS I would like a stable release. > > From the CloudStack perspective it would be great if 14.04 has all > the required packages so it's only a matter of installing the > CloudStack KVM agent and people can start with Ceph. Same goes for > OpenStack I guess. I'm tracking 14.04 Ceph related stuff on this blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-1311-ceph Let me know if you want anything else added/tracked. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSqKQfAAoJEL/srsug59jDmE0P/ii20l2p/pA1mxNz1/wVqpRG +wWcnUdFqoS02NIymmOKhQ1B5VzJ5rLAfnCJtBObZ5tVZH6GmrXl9YpjVS+/AoYm epjgy+QGaks31/NufqR62y38RsoYTVklRkShURPxM3Q0EdsqP4tFbM7h/hKik9IB MI1TYiJU0qzMsn0s5qIOIXcFpYGB/aYgtPamoveIRIfLp4LOhyNqDrpwy42y7Uua zanAF0KmjVw/tmqB45GhbUFIYZCh/YgnfctovKLjal91e4HMfEBxoW6NhwOsdPRz tngXl9Ab2+tXGccHV2UucuLJqksTFnkoltnTz1TXOZjKD2Ys4ImRo7UmJ4ie1z2V kh5aq7b3X0kg7BfV78hG4PUAQWMH6bUcl9Qg0we7BHTT4moVJSF9WunLUwvZqJqq G+IFRyD6sPYpnz+0eQYA6LEu3cwtk2M+9qkkqnfPjJ41W4qM4ckX/0OhJ2EIp0Xj q+n5Ys5xuX0NTSCulSGvRHLz5qhNf6YW101/U/luTH0b1UdCYcptq9uJWy1mduHu jJ36u8iz8ziZm86tUdmuSG84r8bwQf0YdBgBZwvEIXdJ8FGJSU1can4SwseWdNMX NE9I7gU8soYCR3I0BhmOBZ2Cv5DrelvmDR8Hpb7Dqd8VcM2gRV72TJNSsRyWlU1i vhuF5UuUAKsN9eW1tCcm =Vbiu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04, what's still on the TODO?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/12/13 17:48, Peter Matulis wrote: >> I'm tracking 14.04 Ceph related stuff on this blueprint: >>> >>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-1311-ceph >> >>> > >>> Let me know if you want anything else added/tracked. > The rbdmap init script should be upstartified. +1 - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSqOp2AAoJEL/srsug59jDN5EQALMc/tksgevPbb5EGDeeNQXm O+fZzyWorl4jhdFrbz0fjJCbIdpm8uxFDMShM6buJoSG1mzezNh+g3cstSnqJCl3 ihmbG2zWfkbFoXejcLAlbnjUIrcd37sK1s1nGPAQrBNcscCyWPuLOe/vmejMBDKq 9p/RkZAf8znYfzPrX3hny1cb95HtYZJ3N1VmIvHUAsyutzAdnuz/+Hyk5mF8bZb8 jPhWdNS8ve1cUzPL0z+yh4avTpoGznup3qmAXAeI5l/BbeNqDjxFzNrwokFXFPZv +ozmgbF2A64bkv+5VthxGJUw00Gt1TA1z56I3WxzCvzSHjyNKrxcxaUgk8Sz47Ow bDy0yV8wXDism28yvom4yUCnUVCQPD58ZWadok4osiY+COxBD3c1SjJHu6aTWY0o BKVoVbMVFnwNP0mYwPk1OcYQ93GMAweRPYnXtz+ERjQeg3li9yjn4Hhm9w9KejWQ quw1WbJgl0ZSD8zOm6Fri/yVGRNWGffUXfYM/aKhoFTaL5STd/2tMDIo4D14diLA au/ZQ2JsD8Es787/eeJT7Rn3YQnWRzEvtCKqn97bWVn1n/1EAnohV0TFFrrd0CAk Bc1IuSd79gAzgdVeQ9W2RtfkBsdxwMY8APqEIfjbGRrlDzmoPlHEW/I3/rnz9NEl Qctj43jr6rTKgI7j2+D1 =hsBI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ceph under Ubuntu 14.04, what's still on the TODO?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/12/13 09:45, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> I keep ontop of the stable releases during the development cycle; >> we also have a minor release exception for Ceph which means I can >> push point releases as stable release updates. >> > > Great! Before 14.04 comes out I think there will be a minor release > of Emperor. If everything line up OK we will ship with firefly :-) Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSqsxUAAoJEL/srsug59jDYo0QAISZlgpHYbKN2FrPiR7j3H64 HKpm8kbx+xe6Zl4njDNuslXfrnb8H1gpRridrMyHymR0JISth6dECqJSNE8+2FDW Bc4xgZkXoX4qdxRjiXC4LcL7jyTTlVBh5FQJSdd7Thy+RmONkWVV+O4qHBr1kF0A 30aWZl0hVo50pMPbUOaOauq5HcQlrx/lCHfmYaLGn45OMJ3XbdqSvZx7ZO7EufvQ GtQ50nMKJFgvGcADMo4xnyKxXOfeHJ7Rj5VR1kh/nsRIB4Gnfyqd/y8+2VMKIKjK zj4jOW1kX362FB4AFdGui6Dwsw5tb+Nu3WW65ljZaHZO8GSZlZTHqbzxTnLJggCA qPI+JrVbBBgfzl2L0R9g1xvP3U0sRnQgWZjl1dDI7VWFFKuglA3lsMI4nwnVAJfz 3grQ23MeHzUhVdEtuhf4AcAjnLWl8FOzArRYJeW3zCJSElo2ZpBtiNFQZyG0Ssei HrGn+7ILPCE91Ar2enxBjbEUNHDSYJdVw0aaxF2LuJriuL5u4fkv5kM1qoun/MkJ qVbSrvi0fMISuYIpcERlQxfSefN+H0gMPkwqPSvGaKBzIaTMMLisy5dQ7SnZHqs/ gF6k6UTw2hnEBhkIlun0Exps9gitT9lK6MdwG050uMjJSBri/ZJ6PDAyn+kbJuU4 7KKklGqKfx85vUXM1P4a =Umr6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] who is using radosgw with civetweb?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Sage On 25/02/15 19:31, Sage Weil wrote: > We are considering switching to civetweb (the embedded/standalone > rgw web server) as the primary supported RGW frontend instead of > the current apache + mod-fastcgi or mod-proxy-fcgi approach. > "Supported" here means both the primary platform the upstream > development focuses on and what the downstream Red Hat product will > officially support. > > How many people are using RGW standalone using the embedded > civetweb server instead of apache? In production? At what scale? > What version(s) (civetweb first appeared in firefly and we've > backported most fixes). > > Have you seen any problems? Any other feedback? The hope is to > (vastly) simplify deployment. I enabled this feature in the Juju ceph-radosgw charm for Ubuntu in our 15.01 charm release - mod-fastcgi was causing so many headaches! So far in our internal QA cloud its been very reliable running with civetweb - we run three units of the ceph-radosgw charm frontend by haproxy + VIP. I'd +1 switching focus to this approach. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU70zSAAoJEL/srsug59jDXzIP/iC9/GArsdsgG85FFfdWp70P WLYyPXtPd2Yj3AiCCNKnokEwmdWtWa+ws39Z7kew3Qkl69f0iwjrseQAvtt29S/G 9GywcY8lg5pSvXZ0sGOuuEgXvhF0oHHnCwYjXzfziv1/2HwfeFABQkTwZis+TpnE mzw/PtiIOXPaOi4x5VyG4frYbk+qzgF+Ej65XiKca+AFf2T2LmSpWF6iKOhjY01W 9k1ri2DcgPx/JuZ6FXcS1zn1hHmMos58er7uQImkkamd2+rjwqsxm//C2dUXGOee eEdk27d7PHJ2V8xceZF8+YvqAlN03yN5g3sn6nitC6o21Zl/s3Y3W77RPg11XUNE hmPR3VQiZmqqzdrsKSWML+wl8B4a4MOhS7jNP4A8ZZ+JFzNF6xXDV/cBwpmN62Xd 50FYYUS3cpSoEYRyrazS59qQMa5zcsBEwDFnR6nmmUjRW+JjdrxJDCfdSbucTfbr F4FYuE0DGmne5dI/utF9y3WBVant55jC0i9icNZBEcsnLWyOPjUtbPHhu92YnseY N+089Qt1U/KyDr+BxVq7R824ICKr2OoKWncnPHqSiRLS4kgsbnlF8YvdfSg1bvhe WW3lRir0yuPPswYQR/54MvFgSSWL/Kx/XBsQi8KV7iZoOoFJp+jyA+RGxNS7hBEC ke4Q3K+cp+t2mBcZATG+ =Bkwz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] How to Configure Cinder to access multiple pools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 27/02/14 09:29, Vikrant Verma wrote: > But i have one question - As per the link > http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/#configuring-nova > we need to provide the pool name for the parameter > "*libvirt_images_rbd_pool*" in nova.conf of compute node. Do we > need to provide multiple back-end (pools) details here also, > currently it is configured to only one pool which i believe is not > the correct setting. That's only used if you are using ceph as the default backing storage for all instance root volumes. The path to cinder volumes is passed in full when attaching volumes to instances. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTDzc9AAoJEL/srsug59jDaX4QAIAut1pvGFJnnDMS7+x2RBuf cIDeB+AdyWzzTDFIxihu4DaMUrJPgbAKSgjTneT6jFfT0D40zX8FbfAV+PM/PxGz D8j0HUOkzFmpiDWbDM4HtLmGCX6fcddJUQWCS0QBWIZe3GizJvCWGqX8pB4JuNEu AdrxtaXoOfZyWAcVwXkU65RFQwJLAUi8wxxparlDxg0nu6izdaBgkKXA3d6T1qL3 R/9HreQ4HvoC2mtPcvSbmjlmaoBtHaIf+pxGfZjwq+ur+5NZojewJrqpahE76ov8 zStGEhSkJhzJr026OVxv7pK7+XuXRXZk3hrr2WYcaRho2ZGY6PNVrjEOaNmbST0J Cr3D/WaLUmaRa/9nEhB+Dz7aj+XrNlHRBOUl2K8WLa7X/TBNJk/AoIXgxUyq1NeL +vTFkLJ6vKFPfguVdt2zn528YN5CP1ztkDnTq7YV2khpNi2N1ZvTIimQQZw5TENr Z2yAxjJ7nHuiTutkY8qfdYXgF3YOEI/7jdp7wAdCaWLDGugr04eDlf+NXGAUvy+s NYHbauhjg2XBiWQKzeMz4NDjtf3uvH7NmeFjAc34soZ26zzOMI0ODFvptX7GLzxU Iqbn2VsbB0ZR84auJrR42NMLUi/TSnigC5l9IdesbwByCyZuBquxJQiVVjpdYADk UsC6qZGvhdZmUjWO8qzM =GXST -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Cannot create keys for new 0.78 deployment - protocol mismatch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Mark On 25/03/14 00:37, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > I'm redeploying my development cluster after building 0.78 from src > on Ubuntu 14.04. Ceph version is ceph version 0.78-325-ge5a4f5e. Just so you know, 0.78 is now in Ubuntu 14.04; it should be followed by 0.79 prior to release with firefly being dropped in as an SRU shortly afterwards. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTMcJ4AAoJEL/srsug59jD87cQANRrarg9vm257SiSoi4B/j56 V3CEApJ4MrJNcyjkoe5N/I7duEOn2BefqIoCQG/rJASSviSOD1ekuMs4PMZT38Yw SJElXmIP662vxHlUHQL5r3N6D+X+sy5hCCFGRldJbj/qxE6CyGqLfgUooVioPuJ5 MdBKIrn76so2UyACbDOLcze0QcgloSae3MWBGf8PKLyDjfvCpF5jxfwNYWR+6DDp 6HX8zwX3yp3GsSENB6wVnJN8jpyhz3Yq0mYFcxLutFnQqPRhjCoppkq7qOwtGRob Hd36ydId5Nfx0sGIoZk1VRCQlULIt0zJV9lPdiB0G+CPXbN0i3yZgH9s8QvJkTZ7 7viC91H4pwqXLoMvtLc1Xi2ArwiNQP8EIqD9VJ+NjL6RIxKrxYa6so1E8irXLikR 8I1zSNw0my5TuiBiOXkwIsK8Bi1jjjyeST2ZXLhQvtX3ewkPmDda6gzxzZYhI6ww BgJRuiJdq+T7vk8hoT33MWQf7lg8bn0DhlBR2vw7tDd2cDnQWzgEXUeWGaAcAGjV hNhAB8y5QBDieakdYETnHnlMU2j5hGC1yFjWGKD6lsUZhxUBJamcIuVJMD2lKdxf WHB4aVoCW2oZHz+Zh83e4IJaIEYW8i2AIq3sjFiheELVK8p27TEHN9A1RmHRWHQz 8bah57Zdf5lLBj6vgQ+q =xvku -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ceph 0.80 and Ubuntu 14.04
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 30/04/14 06:32, Henrik Korkuc wrote: > > Ubuntu 14.04 currently ships ceph 0.79. After firefly release > ubuntu maintainer will update ceph version in ubuntu's repos. Thanks Henrik - you beat me to it :-) > > On 2014.04.30 07:08, Kenneth wrote: >> >> Latest Ceph release is Firefly v0.80 right? Or is it still in >> beta? And Ubuntu is on 14.04. >> >> Will I be able to install ceph 0.80 on Ubuntu 14.04 for >> production? If not, what is the time frame on when can I install >> the ceph v0.80 on ubuntu 14.04? >> - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTYQntAAoJEL/srsug59jD57sP+gNdjti/98IRQSGDtVaSK58Z Pn2XB278f9pcalZCu3tEVls1ZLTSvs6Mr5pZP7edNWMZOEK84Zr2B9j77N9qNCmD AXxPFzD+qViru6xyUC4zjy6Q0TW74Ko42nKsTEXHbQSYTL0+lyUZIYb0NcPZMpYO 5DJ6RdJmjtdEdisJiUnNEONj/AbKnsM4QvdzUXmNxXVkpl8EGMcsWu2lx8eyIp9e XyCCVjKr3zcAwBZXPl0qp4+9OeYBsOQmE3Bg/gkH9UcYiGhIhQVrghSfayu/0jHt zLWscucxapt2UxRRh5GazAwEWcPhnYdrdcGi/XMr88rrHIAKLayAT/RywhazrZrV ypMyNsCW+y2hFjx1BraNme67U/Gi5BnultapIZ/MnbkOvju40vupWxE7K/SdBOOC T0nVtHN/QfXcGUkXr88YgA8/M50y7O4wsxrGxlk8Nv5EHUAZnBk7VxfLjp7l8597 EvtZ2ctDlP0Pi3ltMzo3FyK2rNSZ/6mN0Bl3ua0W7feElP2LeZhSgSgeayOdsk53 sXakeKaMe4drpEdZs0WeG4pNlij93ks6StscVfV5HKf+vZFvSDXF3dpp/xsif0vo e8fH8Lkrp/9SrkurMbblIzKL9VgIKgU0RyP6QHtaVWT+6JXZwJhvqe6iPRmm67A4 FEGqGlKfR9JOKa21RbXl =tRbw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
[ceph-users] Unable to update Swift ACL's on existing containers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Folks I'm seeing some odd behaviour with RADOS Gateway as part of an OpenStack deployment: Environment: Ceph 0.80.1 Ubuntu 14.04 OpenStack Icehouse Setting ACL's on initial container creation works just fine: $ swift post -r '.r:*,.rlistings' 61853c5a-e1d4-11e3-b125-2c768a4f56ac container is created with ".r:*" read acl but if I try to update the ACL post creation, I get a 401 unauthorized: $ swift post -r '.r:*,.rlistings' 61853c5a-e1d4-11e3-b125-2c768a4f56ac Container POST failed: http://10.98.191.31/swift/v1/61853c5a-e1d4-11e3-b125-2c768a4f56ac 401 Unauthorized AccessDenied Any ideas? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTfnDUAAoJEL/srsug59jDzfsP+gJMS6MJkLiz20i332Rtb0Xi ushFFVDPO2i/nYIQNJOWP5HZlDw8n8kZ3na7wcw900YRQsUCzmcItLsdIGUeyESN /aoeViPmJxgAv6hwG284ps8Uu+ZFHFxMsSAjOX5jNYmaoPaHm3AB0laPDasrmCdH 2+e5Oe3tQeff4xqN1RNRY9o9BlSwqwXKqcnqTjaqzCBFN8sQTg8qJ1y7zs2m8VXd lALyGSy4kfUO1CEGMfECx29Z20IRDdHV5Hao7+5/vlUKT3yqErHnBJPHF003n/se hzwdnjAERc4OkbpFzhiwTWyQ+nZ/xhqEDcp2SN1y3XqNbmL4RUe5hGf6UbWaExVe INhxRUelG59hXpBs91XqlpzReSEibFQFupmn+omegnYaMjTFrABzZ2m0VocYyacq fqJgFcOmXhTsDr+aw7Xt3nYiNldu6yiKLAoqhGIq9m+lm5vhpbdugKgpKFb9vDCv pf4j+4DQI08rKdvndIxenUvn9jBQDK5YsPUj1vvTdKTOLOCPecId9hg9+yll8cVK W2hRLjQ0EjjA2WDYDN0CDq67P6horHl1WApyrN+Y8TkndligKTplspS3KTG0nOyd AGqGT4Aw1Ng4tOjEC1iS6KeFZTntbOFnwZ4WyBE3B8dub06Gu4N0ujHJ7QAn08kX pwCynLP5iO7W7RR0HbUG =PZCP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Unable to update Swift ACL's on existing containers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Yehuda On 23/05/14 02:25, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > That looks like a bug; generally the permission checks there are > broken. I opened issue #8428, and pushed a fix on top of the > firefly branch to wip-8428. I cherry picked the fix and tested - LGTM. Thanks for the quick fix. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTf06vAAoJEL/srsug59jDXokP/3FREIK0HPOl9ZvA3d+y+XUx J6v5mR9BMzVpY4yE4VIB7iZB7FiOPk9McqUSacmDhYvBy1KEwA92NYcF8G79GMiI eNOTYFh0hAg3Lw+y79X8jJ4eWlw2NJGyqsm84UfkOLYOTIPCBOzeqv8X9tVUhChv k20rEmIb0HBJnLp6gScyTrNgX1csOu2MdK+3/GlLeV8MiQJscea8lkbehDhdIJDj FzLfTxPi2tFM8vfR1O/zvcotsWSq1xq2HdXcM1KTIJukMF++mfH6pHMUGthSCUzF /g7DETg+IkGL3crxoZSDODztFR/Q7tD7KCKbd5jH29za11fvhZy9ZamcfJp7gsem G70NYm3gC2kGnFu9A06IBNlwjDDTCzr1cTpdk2xi+kzGBqfshbJ4ppGvnQIypb29 689xXvwLJpIPAR56EGRlxY4W88z7E5krX72XcBTNsrIZP/KvrpKxSMgEhj8N4xZu o3PVZlkMUJ8sOfDG5tWQRF7Nas6AyFhHodBW3vWtykkmW/+aI5dBCMMpm6QoNlMu 8WTGReqs6Skv/kxrpwmhlNLtl9JYU6xrF42/MKKg5zy6pxvRIffSqWV+oy9MdISb hmtTCHTA9Fuj0/n/nUOCi3ZAwroEzcFwknYTivHiTLDaFu7u2eSl28sAczCQ2vie bWYkBOn4FLvFtlnJ2kPF =m4xJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] v0.67.9 Dumpling released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Sage http://ceph.com/download/ceph-0.67.9.tar.gz appears to be missing - any chance it can be posted so I can SRU it for Ubuntu? Cheers James On 21/05/14 21:02, Sage Weil wrote: > This Dumpling point release fixes several minor bugs. The most > prevalent in the field is one that occasionally prevents OSDs from > starting on recently created clusters. > > We recommand that all v0.67.x Dumpling users upgrade at their > convenience. > > Notable Changes --- > > * ceph-fuse, libcephfs: client admin socket command to kick and > inspect MDS sessions (#8021, Zheng Yan) * monclient: fix failure > detection during mon handshake (#8278, Sage Weil) * mon: set tid on > no-op PGStatsAck messages (#8280, Sage Weil) * msgr: fix a rare bug > with connection negotiation between OSDs (Guang Yang) * osd: allow > snap trim throttling with simple delay (#6278, Sage Weil) * osd: > check for splitting when processing recover/backfill reservations > (#6565, Samuel Just) * osd: fix backfill position tracking (#8162, > Samuel Just) * osd: fix bug in backfill stats (Samuel Just) * osd: > fix bug preventing OSD startup for infant clusters (#8162, Greg > Farnum) * osd: fix rare PG resurrection race causing an incomplete > PG (#7740, Samuel Just) * osd: only complete replicas count toward > min_size (#7805, Samuel Just) * rgw: allow setting ACLs with empty > owner (#6892, Yehuda Sadeh) * rgw: send user manifest header field > (#8170, Yehuda Sadeh) > > For more detailed information, see the complete changelog at > > http://ceph.com/docs/master/_downloads/v0.67.9.txt > > Getting Ceph > > * Git at git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git * Tarball at > http://ceph.com/download/ceph-0.67.9.tar.gz * For packages, see > http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/get-packages * For ceph-deploy, > see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/install-ceph-deploy > > ___ ceph-users mailing > list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTjc2yAAoJEL/srsug59jDo84P/R0E/YK+7f/AfjHqPoiZJLOb 2YdTR5K5EV7x7Y0WtWvV51nasTFdZz3tEpO6EbLBCMcFJDVPD2X5H6WVP7k/v7gA YLJzAxyDotV5+wQ1R7OPF1Qt0/4YU5VLWp4bJGck+Ns12i5EnwZUZZ+u7aMqAOkI MQT9gJ1Rr66qHgey+otE/GbXvlU4Kpir+imzrnx1ymY/t2LxuaCFuv8UL2AZY3v5 Z85viedy4wtorhVkjoOxfvgpzEFn1Ul8czPStj8RPjivcDrlDs1vNHt5XIgqrxGG c0U5jl/zYS37BiSM/am8XOQ2Z/kkfXkuG8QI0KHhLwZGb3WzQnJW5GrXquOtlt7y 7iDh1BeNHAN3s6LtqVb7F8kfKYCSK7u14AkmAcPyRX3mWG49TQ2TpqNkBS/wXWk0 u6ES1HwP2BlzNLBAEcEsnjaba99FSVog4cvdTvla+e1/uY5KaVdh+T0WRNlJIwG+ OZ8m6tPKK/4ilWDOkTk2m74HWuL1HSvgqH4i+hKzytZRaCNHX7AF9+LDcKJeG9fr eM+0Czyc8ybVVsjxoC3GXqmwgEZoeVi9uwE5+QFDt1KgbCjdqZyFNYOJOi+MKCov VbqkkCeiS2O4TXjoHB9+MkQJtNyYlB89buxe/JHP1zY5dUvKDZctHvAIm6vW4hSc woLioOnxUyDRJwCW1z5a =zlCH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ceph version upgrade with Juju
Hi Fabio On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 23:02 Fabio Abreu wrote: > Hi Cephers, > > I have a little doubt about the migration of Jewel version in the MAAS / > JUJU implementation scenario . > > Could someone has the same experience in production environment? > > I am asking this because we mapping all challenges of this scenario. > The ceph-mon and ceph-osd charms for Juju support upgrading between Ceph releases; the upgrade is a rolling upgrade, orchestrated through keys managed via the Ceph MON cluster itself. The upgrade triggers are based around the Ubuntu Cloud Archive pockets that also host Ceph (see [0]), so its possible to online upgrade using the charms from: firefly -> hammer hammer -> jewel jewel -> luminous we're working on the upgrade from luminous to mimic at the moment (but that should not be a heavy lift so should land real-soon-now). If you are currently deployed on Xenial (which shipped with Jewel), you can upgrade directly to Luminous by re-configuring the charms: juju config ceph-mon source=cloud:xenial-pike once that has completed (juju status output will tell you when): juju config ceph-osd source=cloud:xenial-pike I'd recommend testing the upgrade in some sort of pre-production testing environment first! HTH James (ceph-* charm contributor and user) [0] https://github.com/openstack/charms.ceph/blob/master/ceph/utils.py#L2539 ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Backporting the kernel client
Hi Juha On 29/04/13 15:29, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Juha Aatrokoski wrote: >I'm probably not the only one who would like to run a distribution-provided >kernel (which for Debian Wheezy/Ubuntu Precise is 3.2) and still have a >recent-enough Ceph kernel client. So I'm wondering whether it's feasible to >backport the kernel client to an earlier kernel. The plan is as follows: Ubuntu 12.04 now includes Hardware Enablement Kernels from Quantal (3.5) and soon from Raring (3.8): http://www.jorgecastro.org/2013/02/19/what-the-lts-enablement-stack-means-for-sysadmins/ This allows you to use a more recent, distro provided kernel than 3.2 which should have the required fixes/features you need. That said if you are having problems with the 3.2 kernel please do report bugs back to Ubuntu. Cheers James -- James Page Technical Lead Ubuntu Server Team james.p...@canonical.com ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu 19.04
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 10:30 PM Kai Stian Olstad wrote: > On 06.07.2019 16:43, Ashley Merrick wrote: > > Looking at the possibility of upgrading my personal storage cluster from > > Ubuntu 18.04 -> 19.04 to benefit from a newer version of the Kernel e.t.c > > For a newer kernel install HWE[1], at the moment you will get the 18.10 > kernel, but in August it will get the 19.04 kernel. > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack If you require newer kernel versions then this is definitely the Ubuntu recommended and supported approach. We do ship Ceph as part of Ubuntu (Mimic was included with 19.04) however interim Ubuntu releases only get 9 months of updates vs the 5 years that Ubuntu 18.04 LTS receives. ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
