Re: [ceph-users] Cache tier unexpected behavior: promote on lock

2017-12-21 Thread Захаров Алексей
Thanks for the answers!
As it leads to a decrease of caching efficiency, i've opened an issue:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22528 

15.12.2017, 23:03, "Gregory Farnum" :
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Захаров Алексей  
> wrote:
>>  Hi, Gregory,
>>  Thank you for your answer!
>>
>>  Is there a way to not promote on "locking", when not using EC pools?
>>  Is it possible to make this configurable?
>>
>>  We don't use EC pool. So, for us this meachanism is overhead. It only adds
>>  more load on both pools and network.
>
> Unfortunately I don't think there's an easy way to avoid it that
> exists right now. The caching is generally not set up well for
> handling these kinds of things, but it's possible the logic to proxy
> class operations onto replicated pools might not be *too*
> objectionable
> -Greg
>
>>  14.12.2017, 01:16, "Gregory Farnum" :
>>
>>  Voluntary “locking” in RADOS is an “object class” operation. These are not
>>  part of the core API and cannot run on EC pools, so any operation using them
>>  will cause an immediate promotion.
>>  On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:02 AM Захаров Алексей 
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  Hello,
>>
>>  I've found that when client gets lock on object then ceph ignores any
>>  promotion settings and promotes this object immedeatly.
>>
>>  Is it a bug or a feature?
>>  Is it configurable?
>>
>>  Hope for any help!
>>
>>  Ceph version: 10.2.10 and 12.2.2
>>  We use libradosstriper-based clients.
>>
>>  Cache pool settings:
>>  size: 3
>>  min_size: 2
>>  crash_replay_interval: 0
>>  pg_num: 2048
>>  pgp_num: 2048
>>  crush_ruleset: 0
>>  hashpspool: true
>>  nodelete: false
>>  nopgchange: false
>>  nosizechange: false
>>  write_fadvise_dontneed: false
>>  noscrub: true
>>  nodeep-scrub: false
>>  hit_set_type: bloom
>>  hit_set_period: 60
>>  hit_set_count: 30
>>  hit_set_fpp: 0.05
>>  use_gmt_hitset: 1
>>  auid: 0
>>  target_max_objects: 0
>>  target_max_bytes: 18819770744832
>>  cache_target_dirty_ratio: 0.4
>>  cache_target_dirty_high_ratio: 0.6
>>  cache_target_full_ratio: 0.8
>>  cache_min_flush_age: 60
>>  cache_min_evict_age: 180
>>  min_read_recency_for_promote: 15
>>  min_write_recency_for_promote: 15
>>  fast_read: 0
>>  hit_set_grade_decay_rate: 50
>>  hit_set_search_last_n: 30
>>
>>  To get lock via cli (to test behavior) we use:
>>  # rados -p poolname lock get --lock-tag weird_ceph_locks --lock-cookie
>>  `uuid` objectname striper.lock
>>  Right after that object could be found in caching pool.
>>
>>  --
>>  Regards,
>>  Aleksei Zakharov
>>  ___
>>  ceph-users mailing list
>>  ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>  http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>  --
>>  Regards,
>>  Aleksei Zakharov

-- 
Regards,
Aleksei Zakharov
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] Cache tier unexpected behavior: promote on lock

2017-12-15 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Захаров Алексей  wrote:
> Hi, Gregory,
> Thank you for your answer!
>
> Is there a way to not promote on "locking", when not using EC pools?
> Is it possible to make this configurable?
>
> We don't use EC pool. So, for us this meachanism is overhead. It only adds
> more load on both pools and network.

Unfortunately I don't think there's an easy way to avoid it that
exists right now. The caching is generally not set up well for
handling these kinds of things, but it's possible the logic to proxy
class operations onto replicated pools might not be *too*
objectionable
-Greg

>
> 14.12.2017, 01:16, "Gregory Farnum" :
>
> Voluntary “locking” in RADOS is an “object class” operation. These are not
> part of the core API and cannot run on EC pools, so any operation using them
> will cause an immediate promotion.
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:02 AM Захаров Алексей 
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've found that when client gets lock on object then ceph ignores any
> promotion settings and promotes this object immedeatly.
>
> Is it a bug or a feature?
> Is it configurable?
>
> Hope for any help!
>
> Ceph version: 10.2.10 and 12.2.2
> We use libradosstriper-based clients.
>
> Cache pool settings:
> size: 3
> min_size: 2
> crash_replay_interval: 0
> pg_num: 2048
> pgp_num: 2048
> crush_ruleset: 0
> hashpspool: true
> nodelete: false
> nopgchange: false
> nosizechange: false
> write_fadvise_dontneed: false
> noscrub: true
> nodeep-scrub: false
> hit_set_type: bloom
> hit_set_period: 60
> hit_set_count: 30
> hit_set_fpp: 0.05
> use_gmt_hitset: 1
> auid: 0
> target_max_objects: 0
> target_max_bytes: 18819770744832
> cache_target_dirty_ratio: 0.4
> cache_target_dirty_high_ratio: 0.6
> cache_target_full_ratio: 0.8
> cache_min_flush_age: 60
> cache_min_evict_age: 180
> min_read_recency_for_promote: 15
> min_write_recency_for_promote: 15
> fast_read: 0
> hit_set_grade_decay_rate: 50
> hit_set_search_last_n: 30
>
> To get lock via cli (to test behavior) we use:
> # rados -p poolname lock get --lock-tag weird_ceph_locks --lock-cookie
> `uuid` objectname striper.lock
> Right after that object could be found in caching pool.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aleksei Zakharov
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aleksei Zakharov
>
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] Cache tier unexpected behavior: promote on lock

2017-12-14 Thread Захаров Алексей
Hi, Gregory,Thank you for your answer! Is there a way to not promote on "locking", when not using EC pools?Is it possible to make this configurable? We don't use EC pool. So, for us this meachanism is overhead. It only adds more load on both pools and network. 14.12.2017, 01:16, "Gregory Farnum" :Voluntary “locking” in RADOS is an “object class” operation. These are not part of the core API and cannot run on EC pools, so any operation using them will cause an immediate promotion.On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:02 AM Захаров Алексей  wrote:Hello,I've found that when client gets lock on object then ceph ignores any promotion settings and promotes this object immedeatly.Is it a bug or a feature?Is it configurable?Hope for any help!Ceph version: 10.2.10 and 12.2.2We use libradosstriper-based clients.Cache pool settings:size: 3min_size: 2crash_replay_interval: 0pg_num: 2048pgp_num: 2048crush_ruleset: 0hashpspool: truenodelete: falsenopgchange: falsenosizechange: falsewrite_fadvise_dontneed: falsenoscrub: truenodeep-scrub: falsehit_set_type: bloomhit_set_period: 60hit_set_count: 30hit_set_fpp: 0.05use_gmt_hitset: 1auid: 0target_max_objects: 0target_max_bytes: 18819770744832cache_target_dirty_ratio: 0.4cache_target_dirty_high_ratio: 0.6cache_target_full_ratio: 0.8cache_min_flush_age: 60cache_min_evict_age: 180min_read_recency_for_promote: 15min_write_recency_for_promote: 15fast_read: 0hit_set_grade_decay_rate: 50hit_set_search_last_n: 30To get lock via cli (to test behavior) we use:# rados -p poolname lock get --lock-tag weird_ceph_locks --lock-cookie `uuid` objectname striper.lockRight after that object could be found in caching pool.--Regards,Aleksei Zakharov___ceph-users mailing listceph-users@lists.ceph.comhttp://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com  -- Regards,Aleksei Zakharov ___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] Cache tier unexpected behavior: promote on lock

2017-12-13 Thread Gregory Farnum
Voluntary “locking” in RADOS is an “object class” operation. These are not
part of the core API and cannot run on EC pools, so any operation using
them will cause an immediate promotion.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:02 AM Захаров Алексей 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've found that when client gets lock on object then ceph ignores any
> promotion settings and promotes this object immedeatly.
>
> Is it a bug or a feature?
> Is it configurable?
>
> Hope for any help!
>
> Ceph version: 10.2.10 and 12.2.2
> We use libradosstriper-based clients.
>
> Cache pool settings:
> size: 3
> min_size: 2
> crash_replay_interval: 0
> pg_num: 2048
> pgp_num: 2048
> crush_ruleset: 0
> hashpspool: true
> nodelete: false
> nopgchange: false
> nosizechange: false
> write_fadvise_dontneed: false
> noscrub: true
> nodeep-scrub: false
> hit_set_type: bloom
> hit_set_period: 60
> hit_set_count: 30
> hit_set_fpp: 0.05
> use_gmt_hitset: 1
> auid: 0
> target_max_objects: 0
> target_max_bytes: 18819770744832
> cache_target_dirty_ratio: 0.4
> cache_target_dirty_high_ratio: 0.6
> cache_target_full_ratio: 0.8
> cache_min_flush_age: 60
> cache_min_evict_age: 180
> min_read_recency_for_promote: 15
> min_write_recency_for_promote: 15
> fast_read: 0
> hit_set_grade_decay_rate: 50
> hit_set_search_last_n: 30
>
> To get lock via cli (to test behavior) we use:
> # rados -p poolname lock get --lock-tag weird_ceph_locks --lock-cookie
> `uuid` objectname striper.lock
> Right after that object could be found in caching pool.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aleksei Zakharov
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


[ceph-users] Cache tier unexpected behavior: promote on lock

2017-12-13 Thread Захаров Алексей
Hello,

I've found that when client gets lock on object then ceph ignores any promotion 
settings and promotes this object immedeatly.

Is it a bug or a feature?
Is it configurable?

Hope for any help!

Ceph version: 10.2.10 and 12.2.2
We use libradosstriper-based clients.

Cache pool settings:
size: 3
min_size: 2
crash_replay_interval: 0
pg_num: 2048
pgp_num: 2048
crush_ruleset: 0
hashpspool: true
nodelete: false
nopgchange: false
nosizechange: false
write_fadvise_dontneed: false
noscrub: true
nodeep-scrub: false
hit_set_type: bloom
hit_set_period: 60
hit_set_count: 30
hit_set_fpp: 0.05
use_gmt_hitset: 1
auid: 0
target_max_objects: 0
target_max_bytes: 18819770744832
cache_target_dirty_ratio: 0.4
cache_target_dirty_high_ratio: 0.6
cache_target_full_ratio: 0.8
cache_min_flush_age: 60
cache_min_evict_age: 180
min_read_recency_for_promote: 15
min_write_recency_for_promote: 15
fast_read: 0
hit_set_grade_decay_rate: 50
hit_set_search_last_n: 30

To get lock via cli (to test behavior) we use:
# rados -p poolname lock get --lock-tag weird_ceph_locks --lock-cookie `uuid` 
objectname striper.lock
Right after that object could be found in caching pool.


-- 
Regards,
Aleksei Zakharov
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com