Hi, we currently do not understand how we got into this situation, nevertheless we have a set of rbd images which has the same SNAPID in the same pool.
kjetil@sc2-r10-u09:~$ rbd snap ls _qa-staging_foo_partial_db SNAPID NAME SIZE 478104 2017-11-29.001 20000 MB kjetil@sc2-r10-u09:~$ rbd snap ls _qa-staging_bar_decimated_be SNAPID NAME SIZE 478104 2017-11-27.001 30720 kB (We have a small collection of these) I currently believe this is bad - is this correct that this is bad ? My rudimentary understanding is that snapid is monotonically increasing, and unique within a pool. At which point this is bad at the point a snapshot gets removed, snapid would get put into removed_snaps, and at some point the osd's would go trimming and might prematurely get rid of clones. Cheers, -- Kjetil Joergensen <kje...@medallia.com> SRE, Medallia Inc
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
