Re: [ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-13 Thread Blair Bethwaite
On 13 July 2015 at 21:36, Emmanuel Florac eflo...@intellique.com wrote:
 I've benchmarked it and found it has about exactly the same performance
 profile as the He6. Compared to the Seagate 6TB it draws much less
 power (almost half), and that's the main selling point IMO, with
 durability.

That's consistent with this other published review (which I found
after the storagereview one):
http://www.tomsitpro.com/articles/hgst-ultrastar-he8-8tb-hdd,2-921-8.html

So seems like a decent option for a capacity-first Ceph cluster.

-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-13 Thread Emmanuel Florac
Le Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:28:17 +1000
Blair Bethwaite blair.bethwa...@gmail.com écrivait:

 Does anyone have any experience with the newish HGST He8 8TB Helium
 filled HDDs? 

I've benchmarked it and found it has about exactly the same performance
profile as the He6. Compared to the Seagate 6TB it draws much less
power (almost half), and that's the main selling point IMO, with
durability.

-- 

Emmanuel Florac |   Direction technique
|   Intellique
|   eflo...@intellique.com
|   +33 1 78 94 84 02

___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-13 Thread Udo Lembke
Hi,
I have just expand our ceph-cluster (7 nodes) with one 8TB HGST (change
from 4TB to 8TB) on each node (and 11 4TB HGST).
But I have set the primary affinity to 0 for the 8 TB-disks... in this
case my performance values are not 8-TB-disk related.

Udo

On 08.07.2015 02:28, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
 Hi folks,

 Does anyone have any experience with the newish HGST He8 8TB Helium
 filled HDDs? Storagereview looked at them here:
 http://www.storagereview.com/hgst_ultrastar_helium_he8_8tb_enterprise_hard_drive_review.
 I'm torn as to the lower read performance shown there than e.g. the
 He6 or Seagate 6TB, but thing is, I think we probably have enough
 aggregate IOPs with ~170 drives. Has anyone tried these in a Ceph
 cluster yet?


___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


[ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-07 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi folks,

Does anyone have any experience with the newish HGST He8 8TB Helium
filled HDDs? Storagereview looked at them here:
http://www.storagereview.com/hgst_ultrastar_helium_he8_8tb_enterprise_hard_drive_review.
I'm torn as to the lower read performance shown there than e.g. the
He6 or Seagate 6TB, but thing is, I think we probably have enough
aggregate IOPs with ~170 drives. Has anyone tried these in a Ceph
cluster yet?

-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-07 Thread Christian Balzer

Re-added list.

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:12:51 +1000 Nigel Williams wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
  In short SMR HDDs seem to be a bad match for Ceph or any random I/O.
 
 The He8 isn't shingled though, it is a PMR drive like the He6.
 
Argh!
That's what you get for speed reading the article from the OP. ^o^; 

In that case and if the IOPS of 170 drives are good enough, I rest my
case. 

Christian
-- 
Christian BalzerNetwork/Systems Engineer
ch...@gol.com   Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
http://www.gol.com/
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-07 Thread Christian Balzer
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:28:17 +1000 Blair Bethwaite wrote:

 Hi folks,
 
 Does anyone have any experience with the newish HGST He8 8TB Helium
 filled HDDs? Storagereview looked at them here:
 http://www.storagereview.com/hgst_ultrastar_helium_he8_8tb_enterprise_hard_drive_review.
 I'm torn as to the lower read performance shown there than e.g. the
 He6 or Seagate 6TB, but thing is, I think we probably have enough
 aggregate IOPs with ~170 drives. Has anyone tried these in a Ceph
 cluster yet?
 
This was just discussed last week in the Ceph Journal Disk Size thread.

In short SMR HDDs seem to be a bad match for Ceph or any random I/O.

If you have an existing cluster, why not compare the performance of your
current HDDs to those and guestimate if those SMR drives can keep up.

As always, Ceph is better with more, smaller HDDs, if you can afford that. 
If your issue is more one of density than cost, having journal SSDs and
maybe a large caching controller in front of those SMR drives should help.

Christian
-- 
Christian BalzerNetwork/Systems Engineer
ch...@gol.com   Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
http://www.gol.com/
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] He8 drives

2015-07-07 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hey Christian,

Thanks, I haven't caught up with my ceph-users backlog from last week
yet so hadn't noticed that thread (SMR drives are something I was
thinking about for a DR cluster and long term archival pool behind
rgw). But note that the He8 drives are not SMR.

Cheers,

On 8 July 2015 at 11:01, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
 On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:28:17 +1000 Blair Bethwaite wrote:

 Hi folks,

 Does anyone have any experience with the newish HGST He8 8TB Helium
 filled HDDs? Storagereview looked at them here:
 http://www.storagereview.com/hgst_ultrastar_helium_he8_8tb_enterprise_hard_drive_review.
 I'm torn as to the lower read performance shown there than e.g. the
 He6 or Seagate 6TB, but thing is, I think we probably have enough
 aggregate IOPs with ~170 drives. Has anyone tried these in a Ceph
 cluster yet?

 This was just discussed last week in the Ceph Journal Disk Size thread.

 In short SMR HDDs seem to be a bad match for Ceph or any random I/O.

 If you have an existing cluster, why not compare the performance of your
 current HDDs to those and guestimate if those SMR drives can keep up.

 As always, Ceph is better with more, smaller HDDs, if you can afford that.
 If your issue is more one of density than cost, having journal SSDs and
 maybe a large caching controller in front of those SMR drives should help.

 Christian
 --
 Christian BalzerNetwork/Systems Engineer
 ch...@gol.com   Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
 http://www.gol.com/



-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com