Re: [ceph-users] pool has many more objects per pg than average
Quoting Brett Chancellor (bchancel...@salesforce.com): > The error will go away once you start storing data in the other pools. Or, > you could simply silence the message with mon_pg_warn_max_object_skew = 0 Ran into this issue myself (again). Note to self: You need to restart the _active_ MGR to get this option active. That's not written anywhere, yet. I'll see if I can make a doc PR to fix that. Gr. Stefan P.s. this option really does more harm than good IMHO. Mixed clusters with cephfs / RGW mixed with RBD pools, and or newly created pools, will run into this issue sooner or later. -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] pool has many more objects per pg than average
The error will go away once you start storing data in the other pools. Or, you could simply silence the message with mon_pg_warn_max_object_skew = 0 On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Torin Woltjer wrote: > I have a ceph cluster and status shows this error: pool libvirt-pool has > many more objects per pg than average (too few pgs?) This pool has the most > stored in it currently, by a large margin. The other pools are > underutilized currently, but are purposed to take a role much greater than > libvirt-pool. Once the other pools begin storing more objects, will this > error go away, or am I misunderstanding the message? > > ___ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
[ceph-users] pool has many more objects per pg than average
I have a ceph cluster and status shows this error: pool libvirt-pool has many more objects per pg than average (too few pgs?) This pool has the most stored in it currently, by a large margin. The other pools are underutilized currently, but are purposed to take a role much greater than libvirt-pool. Once the other pools begin storing more objects, will this error go away, or am I misunderstanding the message? ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
