Re: [CF-metadata] example of sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

2012-08-29 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Hi Ellyn,

Encoding wave spectra in a CF-compliant manner is an issue that I plan to 
address on behalf of SeaDataNet in the next month or so.  The point I'd reached 
in thinking this through was to use the timeSeriesProfile feature type with 
frequency as the z co-ordinate.  I think this OK, but if not I'm sure somebody 
on this list will shout.

I prefer single-value vectors rather to scalars because it opens the way to 
packaging multiple instances into a single NetCDF file.

Cheers, Roy.  

-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Ellyn 
Montgomery
Sent: 28 August 2012 15:04
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] example of 
sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

Hello folks-

We want our wave data observations to be CF compliant, with the 
dimensions and representation of time correct.  I believe the data we 
collect fits somewhere under Discrete Samples, since we end up with a 
time series of wave spectra from our stationary, bottom-mounted acoustic 
instruments.  I couldn't find how the file might look in the 1.6 
conventions document or appendices, so could someone please direct me to 
an example dataset that includes some wave spectra?  Help with which 
featureType should be used would also be appreciated.

The Standard Name table says the dimension order should be 
S(t,x,y,f,theta).  Since our data is from a point observation (lat and 
lon are size (1)), can the X,Y dimensions be dropped, or are they needed 
as place-holders?

Thanks very much for the help!
Ellyn

-- 
Ellyn T. Montgomery, Oceanographer and Data Manager
U.S. Geological Survey
Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center
384 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
(508)457-2356

___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


Re: [CF-metadata] example of sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

2012-08-29 Thread Ellyn Montgomery

Roy-
I'm glad that it's on your plate!

Conceptually, I am a bit uncomfortable with having frequency as Z since 
many of us think of Z as depth/altitude.  Having frequency as Z fits the 
shapes allowed, but I wonder what confusion it would start.  Are there 
ways for clients to identify Z as a non-depth content?  Is it as simple 
as calling the Z coordinate frequency instead of depth, and then 
clients would be able to know what to do?


Then of course the direction component would need to be wedged into the 
coordinate system somehow.  Such fun!


Looking forward to the discussion!
Ellyn


On 08/29/2012 09:54 AM, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:

Hi Ellyn,

Encoding wave spectra in a CF-compliant manner is an issue that I plan to 
address on behalf of SeaDataNet in the next month or so.  The point I'd reached 
in thinking this through was to use the timeSeriesProfile feature type with 
frequency as the z co-ordinate.  I think this OK, but if not I'm sure somebody 
on this list will shout.

I prefer single-value vectors rather to scalars because it opens the way to 
packaging multiple instances into a single NetCDF file.

Cheers, Roy.

-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Ellyn 
Montgomery
Sent: 28 August 2012 15:04
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] example of 
sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

Hello folks-

We want our wave data observations to be CF compliant, with the
dimensions and representation of time correct.  I believe the data we
collect fits somewhere under Discrete Samples, since we end up with a
time series of wave spectra from our stationary, bottom-mounted acoustic
instruments.  I couldn't find how the file might look in the 1.6
conventions document or appendices, so could someone please direct me to
an example dataset that includes some wave spectra?  Help with which
featureType should be used would also be appreciated.

The Standard Name table says the dimension order should be
S(t,x,y,f,theta).  Since our data is from a point observation (lat and
lon are size (1)), can the X,Y dimensions be dropped, or are they needed
as place-holders?

Thanks very much for the help!
Ellyn




--
Ellyn T. Montgomery, Oceanographer and Data Manager
U.S. Geological Survey
Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center
384 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
(508)457-2356

___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


Re: [CF-metadata] example of sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

2012-08-29 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Hi again,

Within BODC, we address your concerns by having a much richer set of feature 
types that include concepts like timeSeriesSpectrum to indicate that the z-axis 
is non-spatial and so give display clients a bit more help.  However, I think 
that with the right parameter attribute semantic information and the CF feature 
types we should be OK in SeaDataNet.

My thinking so far has been confined to non-directional spectra.  I can't see 
how directional spectra could be handled in CF without specification of an 
additional feature type, but (not for the first time) I might be 
misunderstanding something in John's view of feature types.

Cheers, Roy. 

-Original Message-
From: Ellyn Montgomery [mailto:emontgom...@usgs.gov] 
Sent: 29 August 2012 15:47
To: Lowry, Roy K.
Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] example of 
sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

Roy-
I'm glad that it's on your plate!

Conceptually, I am a bit uncomfortable with having frequency as Z since 
many of us think of Z as depth/altitude.  Having frequency as Z fits the 
shapes allowed, but I wonder what confusion it would start.  Are there 
ways for clients to identify Z as a non-depth content?  Is it as simple 
as calling the Z coordinate frequency instead of depth, and then 
clients would be able to know what to do?

Then of course the direction component would need to be wedged into the 
coordinate system somehow.  Such fun!

Looking forward to the discussion!
Ellyn


On 08/29/2012 09:54 AM, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
 Hi Ellyn,

 Encoding wave spectra in a CF-compliant manner is an issue that I plan to 
 address on behalf of SeaDataNet in the next month or so.  The point I'd 
 reached in thinking this through was to use the timeSeriesProfile feature 
 type with frequency as the z co-ordinate.  I think this OK, but if not I'm 
 sure somebody on this list will shout.

 I prefer single-value vectors rather to scalars because it opens the way to 
 packaging multiple instances into a single NetCDF file.

 Cheers, Roy.

 -Original Message-
 From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of 
 Ellyn Montgomery
 Sent: 28 August 2012 15:04
 To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
 Subject: [CF-metadata] example of 
 sea_surface_wave_directional_variance_spectral_density

 Hello folks-

 We want our wave data observations to be CF compliant, with the
 dimensions and representation of time correct.  I believe the data we
 collect fits somewhere under Discrete Samples, since we end up with a
 time series of wave spectra from our stationary, bottom-mounted acoustic
 instruments.  I couldn't find how the file might look in the 1.6
 conventions document or appendices, so could someone please direct me to
 an example dataset that includes some wave spectra?  Help with which
 featureType should be used would also be appreciated.

 The Standard Name table says the dimension order should be
 S(t,x,y,f,theta).  Since our data is from a point observation (lat and
 lon are size (1)), can the X,Y dimensions be dropped, or are they needed
 as place-holders?

 Thanks very much for the help!
 Ellyn



-- 
Ellyn T. Montgomery, Oceanographer and Data Manager
U.S. Geological Survey
Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center
384 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
(508)457-2356

-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata