Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

2012-12-04 Thread Christophe Lerot

Dear Roy,

Thank you very much for the clarification.

Christophe

On 4/12/2012 11:23, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:

Hello Cristophe,

To be absolutely clear, I'm saying the data should be stored in the NetCDF in 
Dobson Units, that the units parameter attribute in the NetCDF file should be 
Dobson Units, but that the canonical unit in the Standard Names List and 
therefore the units mapped in our server should be moles per square metre.

Cheers, Roy.


From: Christophe Lerot [christophe.le...@aeronomie.be]
Sent: 04 December 2012 10:20
To: Lowry, Roy K.
Cc: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

Dear Roy,

Do you mean that the total ozone values should be given in moles per
square metre in the NetCDF files themselves? Or do you mean that I
should simply add a specific comment in the unit parameter attribute to
make clear that the values are provided in Dobson Unit?
The Dobson Unit is quite common for total ozone users and I'd prefer to
stay with this unit if possible.

Cheers,
Christophe

On 3/12/2012 15:39, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:

Hello Alison,

Surely the canonical unit for Dobson Units would be moles per square metre, 
with Dobson Units appearing as the scaled unit in the units parameter 
attribute. Making Dobson Units the canonical unit would be like having cm/s 
rather than m/s as a canonical unit.

Cheers, Roy.

From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk [alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 December 2012 14:18
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

Dear Christophe and Jonathan,

I also support this proposal. We don't currently have any standard names that 
use Dobson Units - I think UDUnits1 didn't support it. However, since it is 
defined in UDunits2 I don't see any problem with adding it.

Best wishes,
Alison

--
Alison Pamment  Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data CentreEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.




-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 27 November 2012 20:52
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

Dear Christophe


So I'd like to propose the following variable name for total ozone
columns based on recommendations I was given:
- "atmosphere_mole_content_of_ozone" expressed in Dobson Units.
Dobson Unit (DU) is already defined in the UDUNIT package ans is
equivalent to 446.2 micromoles m-2.

This seems fine to me. It is consistent in construction with existing
names
for a quantity in mol m-2.

Best wishes

Jonathan
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
Scanned by iCritical.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
-
Dr. Christophe LEROT
Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Chemistry & Physics of Atmospheres
Avenue circulaire, 3
1180 Brussels
Belgium
phone:  +32/(0)2-3730-407
mobile: +32/(0)472-81.87.00
mail:   christophe.le...@aeronomie.be
url:http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/
-

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.


--
-
Dr. Christophe LEROT
Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Chemistry & Physics of Atmospheres
Avenue circulaire, 3
1180 Brussels
Belgium
phone:  +32/(0)2-3730-407
mobile: +32/(0)472-81.87.00
mail:   christophe.le...@aeronomie.be
url:http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/
-



___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metad

Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

2012-12-04 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Hello Cristophe,

To be absolutely clear, I'm saying the data should be stored in the NetCDF in 
Dobson Units, that the units parameter attribute in the NetCDF file should be 
Dobson Units, but that the canonical unit in the Standard Names List and 
therefore the units mapped in our server should be moles per square metre.

Cheers, Roy.


From: Christophe Lerot [christophe.le...@aeronomie.be]
Sent: 04 December 2012 10:20
To: Lowry, Roy K.
Cc: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

Dear Roy,

Do you mean that the total ozone values should be given in moles per
square metre in the NetCDF files themselves? Or do you mean that I
should simply add a specific comment in the unit parameter attribute to
make clear that the values are provided in Dobson Unit?
The Dobson Unit is quite common for total ozone users and I'd prefer to
stay with this unit if possible.

Cheers,
Christophe

On 3/12/2012 15:39, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:
> Hello Alison,
>
> Surely the canonical unit for Dobson Units would be moles per square metre, 
> with Dobson Units appearing as the scaled unit in the units parameter 
> attribute. Making Dobson Units the canonical unit would be like having cm/s 
> rather than m/s as a canonical unit.
>
> Cheers, Roy.
> 
> From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of 
> alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk [alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 December 2012 14:18
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU
>
> Dear Christophe and Jonathan,
>
> I also support this proposal. We don't currently have any standard names that 
> use Dobson Units - I think UDUnits1 didn't support it. However, since it is 
> defined in UDunits2 I don't see any problem with adding it.
>
> Best wishes,
> Alison
>
> --
> Alison Pamment  Tel: +44 1235 778065
> NCAS/British Atmospheric Data CentreEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> R25, 2.22
> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
>> Of Jonathan Gregory
>> Sent: 27 November 2012 20:52
>> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
>> Subject: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU
>>
>> Dear Christophe
>>
>>> So I'd like to propose the following variable name for total ozone
>>> columns based on recommendations I was given:
>>> - "atmosphere_mole_content_of_ozone" expressed in Dobson Units.
>>> Dobson Unit (DU) is already defined in the UDUNIT package ans is
>>> equivalent to 446.2 micromoles m-2.
>> This seems fine to me. It is consistent in construction with existing
>> names
>> for a quantity in mol m-2.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jonathan
>> ___
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
> ___
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
> to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
> reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release 
> under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic 
> records management system.
> ___
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
-
Dr. Christophe LEROT
Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Chemistry & Physics of Atmospheres
Avenue circulaire, 3
1180 Brussels
Belgium
phone:  +32/(0)2-3730-407
mobile: +32/(0)472-81.87.00
mail:   christophe.le...@aeronomie.be
url:http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/
-

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

2012-12-04 Thread Christophe Lerot

Dear Roy,

Do you mean that the total ozone values should be given in moles per 
square metre in the NetCDF files themselves? Or do you mean that I 
should simply add a specific comment in the unit parameter attribute to 
make clear that the values are provided in Dobson Unit?
The Dobson Unit is quite common for total ozone users and I'd prefer to 
stay with this unit if possible.


Cheers,
Christophe

On 3/12/2012 15:39, Lowry, Roy K. wrote:

Hello Alison,

Surely the canonical unit for Dobson Units would be moles per square metre, 
with Dobson Units appearing as the scaled unit in the units parameter 
attribute. Making Dobson Units the canonical unit would be like having cm/s 
rather than m/s as a canonical unit.

Cheers, Roy.

From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of 
alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk [alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 December 2012 14:18
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

Dear Christophe and Jonathan,

I also support this proposal. We don't currently have any standard names that 
use Dobson Units - I think UDUnits1 didn't support it. However, since it is 
defined in UDunits2 I don't see any problem with adding it.

Best wishes,
Alison

--
Alison Pamment  Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data CentreEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.




-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 27 November 2012 20:52
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] new standard name proposal for total ozone in DU

Dear Christophe


So I'd like to propose the following variable name for total ozone
columns based on recommendations I was given:
- "atmosphere_mole_content_of_ozone" expressed in Dobson Units.
Dobson Unit (DU) is already defined in the UDUNIT package ans is
equivalent to 446.2 micromoles m-2.

This seems fine to me. It is consistent in construction with existing
names
for a quantity in mol m-2.

Best wishes

Jonathan
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
Scanned by iCritical.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


--
-
Dr. Christophe LEROT
Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Chemistry & Physics of Atmospheres
Avenue circulaire, 3
1180 Brussels
Belgium
phone:  +32/(0)2-3730-407
mobile: +32/(0)472-81.87.00
mail:   christophe.le...@aeronomie.be
url:http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/
-



___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata