RE: Server Restarts
Check for unlocked session and application vars. That'll do it every time. Ian -Original Message- From: Brian Scandale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:03 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Server Restarts Over the last several days I notice that the Server is taking longer and longer to post the pages I am developing. After a ReStart everything is snappy again!! For example... Multiple ReLoad's of the page shows 4000 +/- 200 milliseconds. After ReStart it now is showing 1500 +/- 200 milliseconds. I am looking for advice on how to chase down this problem. Thanks to the Gurus, Brian __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: Server Restarts
Brian, I would first go to the ColdFusion logs, primarily Application and Server. See if you have any unresponsive/thread messages. The fact that you are "developing" could indicate that some of your newer code is causing some issues. The reason I suspect possible threading issues is that restarts clears things up. If you do have these sorts of messages in the error logs chase down the issues with CF's excellent template-line-position info. Also, if you are using either application or session (also server) scoped variables, you need to CFLOCK writes and reads. Hope this helps. Mike Brunt, CTO Webapper http://www.webapper.com Tel: 562.243.6255 Instant Messaging AIM: webappermb Webapper, Downey CA Office "Webapper - Making the NET Work" -Original Message- From: Brian Scandale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:03 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Server Restarts Over the last several days I notice that the Server is taking longer and longer to post the pages I am developing. After a ReStart everything is snappy again!! For example... Multiple ReLoad's of the page shows 4000 +/- 200 milliseconds. After ReStart it now is showing 1500 +/- 200 milliseconds. I am looking for advice on how to chase down this problem. Thanks to the Gurus, Brian __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Server Restarts
Over the last several days I notice that the Server is taking longer and longer to post the pages I am developing. After a ReStart everything is snappy again!! For example... Multiple ReLoad's of the page shows 4000 +/- 200 milliseconds. After ReStart it now is showing 1500 +/- 200 milliseconds. I am looking for advice on how to chase down this problem. Thanks to the Gurus, Brian __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: Emergency: Authorize. net woos
On 5/25/02, Jim McAtee penned: >Yes, but if you have any kind of customer support dept doing >credits/refunds, you either have to give everyone the password so that >they can enter it manually, have only "trusted" personnel do all the >credits, or else store that password in the system anyway. If you're >manually entering the password, that means you need to change it every >time someone who knows the password leaves the company. Storing it in the >system is probably the safest. > >I recall several years ago when first implementing a system using >Authorize.net, I was passing the username/password for every transaction. >While talking with someone in their support dept about some implementation >issue, I mentioned this and was told that for _security_ reasons, I should >only pass the password when doing a credit. Go figure. Exactly. The majority of online transactions are sales, not credits or refunds. For instance, my shopping cart is not designed to do credits. There are dozens of people using it, and now every one of them will have to store their password in the database or hard code it into the authnet template for now. If you need to do credits online, that's one thing, but if you're doing sales only, you should not be required to use a password. It accomplishes nothing as far as I can tell. -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ 954.721.3452 __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: cf_HTML2Excel Question
Thanks for the reply Joe, I found a solution within the tag itself. Unfortuately I couldn't use CFContent to generate the spreadsheet. Hatton -Original Message- From: Joe Bastian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 2:14 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cf_HTML2Excel Question Hatton, You can do this straight without using cf_html2Excel For the specific problem with '00' just use " " in the table def Field Joe -Original Message- From: Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf_HTML2Excel Question Does anyone have any expeirence with this tag? I have it working almost to where I need it but I'm running into an odd problem. I have a field that is coming in from a SQL Server VarChar with '00' as the value in the field. It is being output to the HTML as 00 in the table but for some reason the excel file is translating it as a numeric value and saving a single 0 in the file. The problem is that it's *supposed* to be a numeric value, so now I guess the question is how to I force the tag (or more to the point, Excel) to save the numbers as characters? TIA! Hatton __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: UTF-8 encoding
> I am using CF to generate an xhtml page. > Does anyone know what I need to do to > serve the page with UTF-8 encoding? in cf5: make it utf-8 format (use notepad to create the template) and pass in in neo: nothing special. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 24/5/2545 __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: cf_HTML2Excel Question
Hatton, You can do this straight without using cf_html2Excel For the specific problem with '00' just use " " in the table def Field Joe -Original Message- From: Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf_HTML2Excel Question Does anyone have any expeirence with this tag? I have it working almost to where I need it but I'm running into an odd problem. I have a field that is coming in from a SQL Server VarChar with '00' as the value in the field. It is being output to the HTML as 00 in the table but for some reason the excel file is translating it as a numeric value and saving a single 0 in the file. The problem is that it's *supposed* to be a numeric value, so now I guess the question is how to I force the tag (or more to the point, Excel) to save the numbers as characters? TIA! Hatton __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
UTF-8 encoding
I am using CF to generate an xhtml page. Does anyone know what I need to do to serve the page with UTF-8 encoding? °¿° ~ Don Vawter FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: QuerySim custom tag and Fusebox 3
I use it in child circuits all the time without a problem. On a possibly related note, I'm wondering why are you using ../ notation to get back to the home circuit? -Original Message- From: heirophant mm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: QuerySim custom tag and Fusebox 3 Hi everyone, I'm using the QuerySim custom tag (find it at www.halhelms.com) to assist in developing a Fusebox 3 site. When I use it in a template that I am viewing directly rather than through the Fusebox ( as in "/index.cfm?fuseaction=circuit.fuse"), it works fine. Also, QuerySim works fine when calling it through the Fusebox, if it is in the home circuit. However, when QuerySim is called in a template used by a child circuit, something wierd happens. I have found that the value of thistag.generatedcontent, which would hold the query contents i pass, is wiped out. Therefore, QuerySim has nothing to make a query out of. I know that the proper place to be using QuerySim is when you're testing individual fuses, especially before you have the "real" query fuses written, so you can say that i'm using QuerySim improperly anyway by using it within the fusebox itself. (in my defense, i have an acceptable reason to be doing this in this case and its only temporary, but i wont try to explain). Anyway, I thought it was strange that the value thistag.generatedcontent of a custom tag would be wiped out in that way. I have thoroughly tested this and found that, indeed, it only happens when calling it within the Fusebox, and only in a child circuit. I am afraid that this reveals some sort of subtle problem with Fusebox itself! But I am probably (and hopefully) wrong... Mike Mertsock Alfred University Web Team Outgrown your current e-mail service? Get a 25MB Inbox, POP3 Access, No Ads and No Taglines with LYCOS MAIL PLUS. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
QuerySim custom tag and Fusebox 3
Hi everyone, I'm using the QuerySim custom tag (find it at www.halhelms.com) to assist in developing a Fusebox 3 site. When I use it in a template that I am viewing directly rather than through the Fusebox ( as in "/index.cfm?fuseaction=circuit.fuse"), it works fine. Also, QuerySim works fine when calling it through the Fusebox, if it is in the home circuit. However, when QuerySim is called in a template used by a child circuit, something wierd happens. I have found that the value of thistag.generatedcontent, which would hold the query contents i pass, is wiped out. Therefore, QuerySim has nothing to make a query out of. I know that the proper place to be using QuerySim is when you're testing individual fuses, especially before you have the "real" query fuses written, so you can say that i'm using QuerySim improperly anyway by using it within the fusebox itself. (in my defense, i have an acceptable reason to be doing this in this case and its only temporary, but i wont try to explain). Anyway, I thought it was strange that the value thistag.generatedcontent of a custom tag would be wiped out in that way. I have thoroughly tested this and found that, indeed, it only happens when calling it within the Fusebox, and only in a child circuit. I am afraid that this reveals some sort of subtle problem with Fusebox itself! But I am probably (and hopefully) wrong... Mike Mertsock Alfred University Web Team Outgrown your current e-mail service? Get a 25MB Inbox, POP3 Access, No Ads and No Taglines with LYCOS MAIL PLUS. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: must be a better method
> My one thing to add here is that if you can re-work > the database to keep date and times separate, it might > be beneficial in the long-run. I've had problems in the > past creating daily reports because I didn't have > isolation of the date and time. I can't imagine why storing the date and time in a single datetime field would cause a problem. It's easy enough to query the database to find only the date or the time value, if that's what you want to do. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ phone: 202-797-5496 fax: 202-797-5444 __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: Emergency: Authorize. net woes
> So what's the deal? Is macromedia going to issue a patch > to fix the urlencoding problem? I have no idea. In my opinion, CFHTTP has been next to useless for quite some time - it has many, many flaws. Oddly enough, MM solicited the opinions of a bunch of CF developers (myself included) about what we'd like CFHTTP to be able to do. Then, apparently, they disregarded all that stuff. Given MM's track record with CFHTTP, I wouldn't expect anything to change very soon with it. Fortunately, it doesn't matter all that much, as there are many alternatives that you can use to accomplish the same thing. In CF MX, I've been testing the Jakarta io JSP tag library, which seems to do most of the things I want to be able to do with an HTTP client: http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/ > It should be automatic. POST doesn't encode, GET does. Well, it's not that simple. First of all, you should be able to send HTTP headers whether you're sending a GET or POST request, but CFHTTP doesn't let you do that - you can only use the CFHTTPPARAM tag when you're POSTing. This limitation prevents you from using CFHTTP with many cookie-enabled sites, as they won't necessarily accept anything other than GET requests for many pages. Second, headers shouldn't ever be encoded, whether you're doing a POST or a GET. This is simply a bug. Finally, you should be able to POST raw data, instead of just name-value pairs. I think that this has been addressed to some degree in CF MX, but the other problems would still make the tag unusable for quite a few things. Since CF MX lets you invoke SOAP services over HTTP directly with the CFINVOKE tag and CreateObject function, this is less of an issue for me, now, but it does prevent you from sending raw data to other interfaces, such as XML-RPC servers. When I say "finally" above, I don't mean to say that there aren't any other problems with CFHTTP, just that I'm not going to bother enumerating any more. Not having full control over headers is kind of a deal-breaker right there. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ phone: 202-797-5496 fax: 202-797-5444 __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: must be a better method
you can also use select distinct to be sure you only list each record/total once. -Original Message- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 7:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: must be a better method My one thing to add here is that if you can re-work the database to keep date and times separate, it might be beneficial in the long-run. I've had problems in the past creating daily reports because I didn't have isolation of the date and time. At 09:49 PM 5/24/2002 -0500, you wrote: >adrian, > >this should work... > >SELECT carrier, cast(convert(char(8),mydate,112) as datetime) as >date_shipped, count(mydate) AS totals >FROM carrier >WHERE mydate BETWEEN '05/1/2002 00:00' AND '05/15/1999 23:59' >GROUP BY carrier,cast(convert(char(8),mydate,112) as datetime) >ORDER BY carrier,cast(convert(char(8),mydate,112) as datetime) > >~ dina > >- Original Message - >From: "Adrian Cesana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:49 PM >Subject: RE: must be a better method > > > > Thanks, this seems to be working well although the output >format isnt really > > what I wanted but I can work around that. The other issue I >have now using > > this method is the grouping is also including the times from >the date field, > > I only want to group on the mmdd portion. I know I need to >use DatePart > > but cant seem to get it to work with the GROUP BY. Any >tips > > > > This is basically the query Im using... > > > > SELECT carrier,mydate,count(mydate) AS totals FROM mytable > > WHERE mydate BETWEEN '05/1/2002 00:00' AND '05/15/2002 23:59' > > GOUP BY carrier,mydate ORDER BY carrier,mydate > > > > Thanks,Adrian > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:06 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: must be a better method > > > > > > At 12:47 PM 5/24/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > >Im generating a summary report but the current method Im using >could result > > >in up to 100 queries or more...so this is what Im trying to >achieve. > > > > > >Basically dealing with two fields, Carrier and Date. The user >selects a > > >date range, I need a count all the records for each day within >the range > > >grouping by the Carrier. > > > > I'm not sure if you want: > > > >A single count for the specified date range. So, if the >range is June > > 1st through July 1st, you will get 1 count per carrier. > > > > Or > > > >A count for each day in the specified range. So if the >range is June > > 1st through July 1st, you will get 30 counts per character. > > > > This might take some experimentation, but.. something along the >lines of: > > > > SELECT Count(CarrierTable.DateField) as DateCount, Carrier, >DateField > > FROM CarrierTable > > WHERE DateField BETWEEN StartDate and EndDate > > GROUP BY CarrierTable.Carrier, DateField > > > > Something like this (off the top of my head ) should give you >the output > > you need: > > > > > > > > #MyQuery.Carrier# > > > > > > > > #MyQuery.DateCount# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But this could potentially cause problems matching up >carriers with date > > columns if it is possible that a single carrier will have no >entries on a > > date. > > > > > > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: Emergency: Authorize. net woos
- Original Message - From: "Bud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: RE: Emergency: Authorize. net woos > On 5/25/02, Mark A. Kruger - CFG penned: > >If you are using ADC Direct Response (not relay - direct), the type of > >implementation where you get a comma delimited list in return for your post, > >then you are not "yet" required to use the refer URL. Here's a snippet from > >the integration doc that Auth.net published. > > I've been trying to get an answer out of them why the > password-required mode will soon be implemented. All they'll say is > "Security Reasons". I've told them that my concern is that now, > everyone's authnet password must be stored on the server or in a > database for hackers to get to. Once they get that, they can simply > log in to authnet's console and credit funds to the credit cards of > their choice. Why on earth should a password be required to submit a > Sale transaction? I mean, if someone has my username only and would > like to put money into my bank account, so be it. It doesn't get THEM > anything. Yes, but if you have any kind of customer support dept doing credits/refunds, you either have to give everyone the password so that they can enter it manually, have only "trusted" personnel do all the credits, or else store that password in the system anyway. If you're manually entering the password, that means you need to change it every time someone who knows the password leaves the company. Storing it in the system is probably the safest. I recall several years ago when first implementing a system using Authorize.net, I was passing the username/password for every transaction. While talking with someone in their support dept about some implementation issue, I mentioned this and was told that for _security_ reasons, I should only pass the password when doing a credit. Go figure. Jim __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: must be a better method
My one thing to add here is that if you can re-work the database to keep date and times separate, it might be beneficial in the long-run. I've had problems in the past creating daily reports because I didn't have isolation of the date and time. At 09:49 PM 5/24/2002 -0500, you wrote: >adrian, > >this should work... > >SELECT carrier, cast(convert(char(8),mydate,112) as datetime) as >date_shipped, count(mydate) AS totals >FROM carrier >WHERE mydate BETWEEN '05/1/2002 00:00' AND '05/15/1999 23:59' >GROUP BY carrier,cast(convert(char(8),mydate,112) as datetime) >ORDER BY carrier,cast(convert(char(8),mydate,112) as datetime) > >~ dina > >- Original Message - >From: "Adrian Cesana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:49 PM >Subject: RE: must be a better method > > > > Thanks, this seems to be working well although the output >format isnt really > > what I wanted but I can work around that. The other issue I >have now using > > this method is the grouping is also including the times from >the date field, > > I only want to group on the mmdd portion. I know I need to >use DatePart > > but cant seem to get it to work with the GROUP BY. Any >tips > > > > This is basically the query Im using... > > > > SELECT carrier,mydate,count(mydate) AS totals FROM mytable > > WHERE mydate BETWEEN '05/1/2002 00:00' AND '05/15/2002 23:59' > > GOUP BY carrier,mydate ORDER BY carrier,mydate > > > > Thanks,Adrian > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 1:06 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: must be a better method > > > > > > At 12:47 PM 5/24/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > >Im generating a summary report but the current method Im using >could result > > >in up to 100 queries or more...so this is what Im trying to >achieve. > > > > > >Basically dealing with two fields, Carrier and Date. The user >selects a > > >date range, I need a count all the records for each day within >the range > > >grouping by the Carrier. > > > > I'm not sure if you want: > > > >A single count for the specified date range. So, if the >range is June > > 1st through July 1st, you will get 1 count per carrier. > > > > Or > > > >A count for each day in the specified range. So if the >range is June > > 1st through July 1st, you will get 30 counts per character. > > > > This might take some experimentation, but.. something along the >lines of: > > > > SELECT Count(CarrierTable.DateField) as DateCount, Carrier, >DateField > > FROM CarrierTable > > WHERE DateField BETWEEN StartDate and EndDate > > GROUP BY CarrierTable.Carrier, DateField > > > > Something like this (off the top of my head ) should give you >the output > > you need: > > > > > > > > #MyQuery.Carrier# > > > > > > > > #MyQuery.DateCount# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But this could potentially cause problems matching up >carriers with date > > columns if it is possible that a single carrier will have no >entries on a > > date. > > > > > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: Emergency: Authorize. net woos
On 5/25/02, Mark A. Kruger - CFG penned: >If you are using ADC Direct Response (not relay - direct), the type of >implementation where you get a comma delimited list in return for your post, >then you are not "yet" required to use the refer URL. Here's a snippet from >the integration doc that Auth.net published. I've been trying to get an answer out of them why the password-required mode will soon be implemented. All they'll say is "Security Reasons". I've told them that my concern is that now, everyone's authnet password must be stored on the server or in a database for hackers to get to. Once they get that, they can simply log in to authnet's console and credit funds to the credit cards of their choice. Why on earth should a password be required to submit a Sale transaction? I mean, if someone has my username only and would like to put money into my bank account, so be it. It doesn't get THEM anything. -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ 954.721.3452 __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: Emergency: Authorize. net woos
On 5/24/02, Dave Watts penned: >Well, that's what you get for listening to me - you can set the Referer >header, but I can't figure a way to stop CF from encoding it, which kind of >makes the header option useless. This is just one of the many, many ways >that CFHTTP stinks - there are so many ways, that I never actually use >CFHTTP; I just replace it with a third-party component - I typically use >Lewis Sellers' TCPClient COM object for this >(http://www.intrafoundation.com/freeware.html), if I'm working on Windows. >It's pretty easy to use, and best of all, it doesn't do anything you don't >tell it to do! So what's the deal? Is macromedia going to issue a patch to fix the urlencoding problem? It should be automatic. POST doesn't encode, GET does. -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ 954.721.3452 __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: FreeBSD and Java = CFMX???
> From: Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You have to be realistic and have a little business savvy. Concur. I've seen maybe 3-4 people mention they were interested in seeing it on FreeBSD? So I'm curious, has anyone been able to get the Linux version of CFMX running on FreeBSD 4.5? Believe it or not, I once had JRun running on a FreeBSD 3.4 box a couple of years back just to see if I could get it up and running. It was slow and it crashed a little too often, but it worked at least. I do remember seeing something about CFMX on FreeBSD in the beta forums, but I don't remember coming across anyone claiming to have of gotten it working. Anyhow, one of the projects I'm planning on pursuing over the weekend is trying to get CFMX working on 4.5 with Linux emulation. If it runs reasonably, I could certainly justify purchasing a copy of it to use on my personal server so long as the final version still work on it. I'm in the process of throwing some hardware together to try it out since I don't have anything newer than a firewall/NAT box running 4.3 around, and I really don't want to do a buildworld on my personal server to upgrade it since its pretty customized at this point. I don't think I could swallow having to move back to Linux or Win2K on my personal server, unfortunately. I hope I can get it to work. Otherwise I'm stuck with PHP for now. - Brandon -- http://spooled.net http://booms.net FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
