RE: Internal webserver vs. Apache on MX for JRun was Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone
> > As far as I can tell, there's no difference between > > the web server used by CFMX for JRun and that used > > by the "standalone" CFMX Enterprise or Professional. > > Are your comments based on any sort of stress testing > results or published literature? I agree with what > you're saying, but last time we made an assumption > about the two products being the same (Re: CFMX > Enterprise vs. CFMX for J2EE), MM chimed in and said > there were some unexpected differences between the > two products. So I suppose I was hoping that Sean > or Phil or somebody else at MM could weigh in with > the "official" response. However, that being said, I > have been proceeding on the premise that what you said > is how it is. No, my comments aren't based on stress testing or published literature. I wouldn't bother wasting valuable load-testing time with the JRun web server, since Macromedia recommends not using it in a production environment. Since they make that recommendation for both JRun and CFMX, I'd expect there to be little difference between them in that regard. Also, I can't imagine that the web server itself could be much different. In both cases, no matter how many application server instances are running, or no matter how many different, specialized VMs are used between them, there's only going to be one application listening on the appropriate socket, routing requests to one or more application servers. And as for those "unexpected differences", I suspect that for many people's environments and applications, there wouldn't be any difference at all. I seem to recall reading, for example, that one of the big advantages of CFMX for J2EE is its performance on multi-processor boxes. I suspect that other performance advantages of CFMX for J2EE come from writing more of your application code in Java and less in CFML. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
OT: Devex gallery still not working MM pay attention
I brought this issue up months ago, the member gallery has become completely unusable for me on Windows XP, IE 6.1 machines. I have brought this up to members of Macromedia and they say they will get back to me and they never do. I have done a couple workarounds that Macromedia has suggested and it just doesn't work. This is happening on more than one machine and more than one location, the only coincidence is Win XP IE 6.1. How many other people are getting this at the top of thier screens when they sign on? HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:45:21 GMT Connection: close Content-type: text/html Page-Completion-Status: Normal Page-Completion-Status: Normal Set-Cookie: MMUSERID=27755031; path=/; domain=.macromedia.com; Set-Cookie: ONYXIINDIVIDUALID=; path=/; domain=.macromedia.com; Set-Cookie: SESSION=%7Bts+%272003%2D01%2D12+11%3A45%3A19%27%7D; path=/; Set-Cookie: UID=2476F8C8%2D8496%2D11D6%2D84508B94F85A; expires=Sun, 27-Sep-2037 00:00:00 GMT; path=/; domain=.macromedia.com; PLEASE FIX!! Bob Everland ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Design Pattern Question
Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of procedural methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts. Yet in my opinion there is a further dimension that Fusebox achieves, or has done for us, that I have not yet seen expounded in CFMX tutorials etc. Using Fusebox in conjunction with FLIP we have a complete application design and development environment from concept-discussion through coding-ongoing maintenance. In addition by using Fusebox we have found it easy to bring in developers who had never coded on CF before but who had a good grasp of HTML, JavaScript and/or ASP-JSP. Further by abstracting the actual Fuseaction values till run-time Fusebox truly affords the capability at another layer of separation, that of separating design from development; when combined with the very descriptive capabilities afforded by the use of Fusedocs. Finally, the logicality of using Circuits as a mapping/pathing mechanism addresses to physical layout questions of developing a web application. There is one last very important point here, there have been many previous methodologies/frameworks applied to ColdFusion development. What is different in Fusebox is it has become the most widely used of all of them and that is a very considerable factor for those of us using teams of developers that can change, grow, shrink etc. I recommend you take a look at Hal Helms work http://www.halhelms.com/webresources/fuseboxmxpreso/page1.htm as CFMX and Fusebox are melded to form the next iteration of Fusebox. Kind Regards - Mike Brunt Webapper Services LLC Web Site http://www.webapper.com Blog http://www.webapper.net Webapper -Original Message- From: Peter Bagnato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question I think that this is a very healthy design methodology for CF. Ben Forta has been harping for ages about the importance of separating the display, application, and data layers from the CF applications. The methodology outlined in that page presents this to the CF environment. It actually follows many of the well known and widely used J2EE methodologies out there. That was something that always bugged me about FuseBox and other methodologies presented for CF. Those are just my thoughts: Peter Bagnato -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF_Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Design Pattern Question Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here using it? Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know who put this together in the first place? As one of my former commanders used to ask "Questions? Comments? War Stories?" Cutter ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Devex gallery still not working MM pay attention
Robert, Please send the URL of the service you are trying to access on Macromedia's website to me off-list. Also, how long has this been happening, and do you know who at Macromedia you spoke with? Thanks, Christian On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 11:40 AM, Robert Everland wrote: > I brought this issue up months ago, the member gallery has become > completely > unusable for me on Windows XP, IE 6.1 machines. I have brought this up > to > members of Macromedia and they say they will get back to me and they > never > do. I have done a couple workarounds that Macromedia has suggested and > it > just doesn't work. This is happening on more than one machine and more > than > one location, the only coincidence is Win XP IE 6.1. How many other > people > are getting this at the top of thier screens when they sign on? > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0 > Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:45:21 GMT > Connection: close > Content-type: text/html > Page-Completion-Status: Normal > Page-Completion-Status: Normal > Set-Cookie: MMUSERID=27755031; path=/; domain=.macromedia.com; > Set-Cookie: ONYXIINDIVIDUALID=; path=/; domain=.macromedia.com; > Set-Cookie: SESSION=%7Bts+%272003%2D01%2D12+11%3A45%3A19%27%7D; path=/; > Set-Cookie: UID=2476F8C8%2D8496%2D11D6%2D84508B94F85A; expires=Sun, > 27-Sep-2037 00:00:00 GMT; path=/; domain=.macromedia.com; > > > PLEASE FIX!! > > > Bob Everland > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Design Pattern Question
On Saturday, Jan 11, 2003, at 20:58 US/Pacific, Cutter (CF_Talk) wrote: > Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design > pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here using it? > Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know who put > this together in the first place? It was written by Benoit Hedard. I blogged a review of it over xmas: http://www.corfield.org/blog/2002_12_01_archive.html#86606119 It has a lot of interesting ideas in it that would help you build MVC-style applications. My team uses OO design patterns extensively as we rebuild macromedia.com. I published an article scratching the surface of that: http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/articles/facades.html > As one of my former commanders used to ask "Questions? Comments? War > Stories?" We've found the application of OO design patterns to CFMX to be very helpful in structuring our applications. Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc. tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473 aim/iChat: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com An Architect's View -- http://www.macromedia.com/go/arch_blog ColdFusion MX and JRun 4 now available for Mac OS X! http://www.macromedia.com/go/cfmxosx ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Another Locking Question
Hi, If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read lock it. Is the var really being read? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
OT: disabling qForms validation
A slight problem I'm having with qForms JS API. I have different submit buttons that do different things on my form, and I want some of them to just skip the whole qForms validation process. For instance, some fields have a configurable number of rows, and the buttons to add or remove rows are submit buttons, so the current state of the form is reloaded. I do have an OKish solution - for the submit buttons that don't need validation, I add this to the onclick event: objForm._allowSubmitOnError = true; objForm._showAlerts = false; It just seems a little clumsy - the validation is run anyway, only the alerts aren't shown and submit is allowed. Any quick way to just say "objForm.justForgetItForNow"? Gyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: http://www.tengai.co.uk play: http://norlonto.net PGP key available ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Another Locking Question
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 12:23 US/Pacific, Webmaster wrote: > If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read > lock > it. Is the var really being read? No, but... If you are trying to avoid a race condition, you may need to lock. See my blog entry: http://www.corfield.org/blog/2003_01_01_archive.html#87048759 Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc. tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473 aim/iChat: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com An Architect's View -- http://www.macromedia.com/go/arch_blog ColdFusion MX and JRun 4 now available for Mac OS X! http://www.macromedia.com/go/cfmxosx ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Another Locking Question
- Original Message -
From: "Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read
lock
> it. Is the var really being read?
---
Yep - if you're not on CFMX, even IsDefined("sharedScope.varName") needs a
lock around it. If you need to reference this more than once in a template,
of course, set a temp variable:
Gyrus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: http://www.tengai.co.uk
play: http://norlonto.net
PGP key available
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
SOT: a good CF and other "scripts" site
http://www.needscripts.com == Peter Tilbrook Internet Applications Developer Australian Building Codes Board GPO Box 9839 CANBERRA ACT 2601 AUSTRALIA WWW: http://www.abcb.gov.au/ E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: (02) 6213 6731 Mobile: 0439 401 823 Facsimile: (02) 6213 7287 ** The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it, is intended for the use of addressee and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, read, forward, copy or retain any of the information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return e-mail or telephone. The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or any other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage, or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. ** ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Another Locking Question
While there arguably are circumstances where you don't need to lock, if you just do it always, everywhere (subject to the smart use of temp vars as was pointed out already), your code will work properly. I have yet to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance penalty at any level. Just Say Yes to CFLock... Always and Forevermore. :-) Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com -Original Message- From: Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Another Locking Question Hi, If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read lock it. Is the var really being read? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
SOT: Enterprise-Class ERP for Xserve
The Sybase evangelist just emailed information about the following: PowerEasy and Sybase Announce First Packaged Enterprise-Class ERP System Powered by Sybase and Apple Infrastructure http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/030106/60324_1.html PowerEasy is at: http://www.powereasy.com/ Sybase is at: http://www.sybase.com Quoting the article: "With pricing starting at $80,000 per machine, the solution will be 20 percent less than comparable solutions on Windows platforms and will provide the Mac community with an easy-to-use, yet industrial-strength solution with an attractive total cost of ownership value." This might signal some opportunities for CF Developers on the Mac, at least it indicates that Enterprise-level solutions are being developed for the Mac. Dick ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Another Locking Question
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 13:23 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote: > I have yet > to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance > penalty at any level. If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your application and it will not scale. For low-traffic applications, that may be fine. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Detecting Flash for use in CFGraph
fantastic - thanks > >Here ya go > >http://www.xs4all.nl/~ppk/js/flash.html > > > > >Robert Bailey >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >"Famous for nothing!" >http://www.tinetics.com > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Antony Sideropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 8:16 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Detecting Flash for use in CFGraph > > >Hi all > >Does anyone know of an easy way to detect if the client browser has a >flash >plug-in installed? > >I am hoping to detect it on the home page, pass a variable back to the >server and then serve up a jpg or flash graph, depending on the >variable. >(I know how to do Steps 2 and 3). > >If it helps, i am designing for MSIE 5+ > >Thanks > > > > > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Another Locking Question
Sean A Corfield wrote: > On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 13:23 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote: > >>I have yet >>to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance >>penalty at any level. > > > If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your > application and it will not scale. For low-traffic applications, that > may be fine. I think that is a bit of an oversimplification. Maybe it is a good idea to distinguish between readonly and exclusive locks and between different scopes. But if we are talking performance penalties, single-threaded sessions are evil. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Another Locking Question
I got a tip previously on cf-talk that advised me to do this in my application.cfm: Is this good or bad? (My sites typically have between 10 and 200 connections.) > >Sean A Corfield wrote: > > On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 13:23 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote: > > > >>I have yet > >>to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance > >>penalty at any level. > > > > > > If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your > > application and it will not scale. For low-traffic applications, that > > may be fine. > >I think that is a bit of an oversimplification. Maybe it is a good idea >to distinguish between readonly and exclusive locks and between >different scopes. >But if we are talking performance penalties, single-threaded sessions >are evil. > >Jochem > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Another Locking Question
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 14:20 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > Sean A Corfield wrote: >> If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your >> application and it will not scale. For low-traffic applications, that >> may be fine. > I think that is a bit of an oversimplification. Maybe it is a good idea > to distinguish between readonly and exclusive locks and between > different scopes. True. My bad. I was in a hurry. cflock type="exclusive" on every request will single-thread your application. cflock type="readonly" will not. However, to avoid race conditions, you may still need to use exclusive locks - you just have to be careful about it (Marcello's great tip on this is in my blog entry). ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: URL Scope
(from Java Network Programming) "Because of limitations in the lengths of environment variables on some platforms, the GET method is unreliable for sending more than 200 characters of text." As well, from http://www.macromedia.com/support/generator/ts/documents/passing_character_limit.htm: "Certain servers and browsers can not pass more than 255 characters through the URL. The W3C proposed HTTP 1.1 standards that state there is no URL character limit, however, 255 bytes/characters is the standard limit across older browsers and HTTP servers. Quoting from the HTTP 1.1 standards document: The HTTP protocol does not place any a priori limit on the length of a URI. Servers MUST be able to handle the URI of any resource they serve, and SHOULD be able to handle URIs of unbounded length if they provide GET-based forms that could generate such URIs. A server SHOULD return 414 (Request-URI Too Long) status if a URI is longer than the server can handle (see section 10.4.15). Note: Servers should be cautious about depending on URI lengths above 255 bytes, because some older client or proxy implementations may not properly support these lengths." hth michael corbridge macromedia > -Original Message- > From: Yves Arsenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 7:03 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: URL Scope > > > Hello, > > I was just wondering (because I have never come across any such > information) if there is a limit to the number of URL > variables one can > pass to another CF template. > > TIA, > > Yves Arsenault > Carrefour Infotech > 5, Acadian Dr. > Charlottetown, PEI > C1C 1M2 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (902)368-1895 ext.242 > > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
cf5 & linux
We have just recently installed cf5 on a linux platform. We are getting errors using CFFILE & CFDIRECTORY, even thought thay are activated in the administrator. I think it might be some sort of ownership problem, can anyone point me in the right direction thanks Steve Soars ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Another Locking Question
I didn't mean to imply that there wasn't a dumb way to use cflock :D, just that its *proper* use is going to give good results and the reverse can *generally* be counted on to do the opposite. My point was that if you are going to use shared scope vars, lock 'em always. Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com -Original Message- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 2:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Another Locking Question On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 13:23 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote: > I have yet > to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance > penalty at any level. If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your application and it will not scale. For low-traffic applications, that may be fine. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: cf5 & linux
oops sorry wrong list - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:20 PM Subject: cf5 & linux > We have just recently installed cf5 on a linux platform. We are getting errors using CFFILE & CFDIRECTORY, even thought thay are activated in the administrator. > > I think it might be some sort of ownership problem, can anyone point me in the right direction > > thanks > Steve Soars > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Cannot convert to number.
I am having a really weird problem... I do some calculations in CF, they work on my development machine (Windows XP Home/Apache) but when I upload them to my host (Windows 2000/IIS) they don't work. I get this error... anybody able to help me on this one? *** *** *** Error Diagnostic Information An error occurred while evaluating the expression: EndRow = StartRow + OnEachPage - 1 Error near line 39, column 8. Cannot convert to number. Please, check the ColdFusion manual for the allowed conversions between data types The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (CFSET), occupying document position (39:2) to (39:43). Date/Time: 01/12/03 23:33:29 Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Remote Address: 207.195.97.118 *** *** *** My code is below: SELECT jubileeid, globalnumber, nanumber, rotundanumber, binlocation, name FROM tools ORDER BY name ASC ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Cannot convert to number.
Yes, I have had similar errors. Its usually when your query does not return a numerical data where a number is expected. Check your database--specially the rows in numerical columns. Replacing null/empty numerical cells with 0 (zero) might solve your problem HTH Srimanta htttp://www.digitalshop.co.nz - Original Message - From: Jillian Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 10:15 PM Subject: Cannot convert to number. > I am having a really weird problem... I do some calculations in CF, they > work on my development machine (Windows XP Home/Apache) but when I > upload them to my host (Windows 2000/IIS) they don't work. I get this > error... anybody able to help me on this one? > > *** *** *** > > Error Diagnostic Information > > An error occurred while evaluating the expression: > EndRow = StartRow + OnEachPage - 1 > > Error near line 39, column 8. > > Cannot convert to number. > Please, check the ColdFusion manual for the allowed conversions between > data types > The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier > of (CFSET), occupying document position (39:2) to (39:43). > Date/Time: 01/12/03 23:33:29 > Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) > Remote Address: 207.195.97.118 > > *** *** *** > > My code is below: > > > > password="cds337"> > SELECT jubileeid, globalnumber, nanumber, rotundanumber, binlocation, > name > FROM tools > ORDER BY name ASC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
