Re: SOT: Action Canceled, XP Service Pack 2
I assume you're writing the html/xls file to disk here? How about generating the html as a normal request, then placing this at the top: You can then link to this URL directly and it will download as an excel spreadsheet. Ian >I'm using a combination of Flash and Coldfusion web services to generate >an Excel Spreadhseet (technically, the web service saves an html file on >the server with a .xls extension), and returns the URL to Flash. Flash >then uses getURL to open the .xls file in a new browser window. > >This worked great but now with Windows XP Service Pack 2, the new window >pops up and then is filled with an "Action Canceled" message. If you >click "Refresh" in the toolbar of that window, it opens the spreadsheet >just fine. > >Has anyone experience a similar problem and solved it? > >-- >Another annoyance with Service Pack 2 is the popup blocker, which also >blocks the new window.. it's not technically a popup... it's just a new >browser window.. like > >But even after allowing popups from the domain, you still get the >"Action canceled" message.. > > - rick [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: refresh inserts my form content
a lot of times i wont use a thank u page (ex: in the admin section) just have the form page --> process page then after all my code I cflocation them back to the previous page. SInce technically its the same as a new visitor going there and?or u can put some simple form check in as well such as Sorry there has been an error, please try again put that at the top of the page and preview in your browser make sure u put the in there though -- Original Message -- From: daniel kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:27:52 -0400 >ok, charlie and Dave, that's a good point. Now, I'm gonna go do it, but my first thought is that when the user clicks the back button, it'll re-insert then. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
RE: Losing Form Scope
ARe you by any chance using a Custom Tag? Sandy Clark http://www.shayna.com CF Pretty Accessible at http://www.shayna.com/blog Now offering 4 days Hands on CSS training October 11-14th. Rockville, MD. For more information go to: http://www.teratech.com/training/oc_classes.cfm#css _ From: Stan Winchester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 9:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Losing Form Scope I have a form that is submitting to an action page, but for some reason when the action page loads the form scope is gone, so when I look at the debugging information under "Scope Variables" the entire "Form Fields:" section is not even listed. This happens on the live CF5 server and my local CFMX development server. value="YES - Extend the Ad Account" class="button"> Has anyone seen anything like this before? Thank you, Stan Winchester _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: CF and JavaScript Form Question
Hi Guy, Sorry about your Dad, thats a tough one we all have to face. On your question; why not just submit the form to an action page in the normal way? i.e. in the action page you can loop through the #form# structure and all your dynamic form fields will be there. You can use structure functions such as structKeyList() if you need to know the names of the form fields. Hope that is of some help. Michael - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:49:53 -0400 Subject: CF and _javascript_ Form Question To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Goal : To take form values from the dynamically generated, and named, form elements and pass those values onto an action page. Intended Course: Write the variables to a CF Array or Structure, client side through a _javascript_ function -> WDDX serialize that Array into a client scope WDDX -> Deserialize the WDDX Packet on the action page. Challenge: I absolutely suck at _javascript_. I thought I knew something - turns out I don't. Code in Question: Size="1">Qty. of #MakeSize#: size="4"> NOTE: MakeSize is the String Equiv of Value_ID ie. ValueID =24 then MakeSize = Large, ValueID = 23 then MakeSize = Small, etc Question: What's the quickest way to do this? This could generate 0 - 15 or so form elements, so I think URL variables are out. Maybe not. Possibly put these into a list and pass that in the URL and parse it out on the other side? If so - how? Am I out to lunch with the WDDX idea? If not, where could I go to see how to create a CF Array or Struct via a _javascript_ function? Personal Note: Not thinking well - my first B-day without my dad. First everything after losing someone always sucks. Yeah, I'm a heart-on-my-sleeve guy. Guy McDowell Web Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Magma Communications Ltd. t: 613.228.3565 x6348 f: 613.228.8313 http://websites.magma.ca This e-mail message is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. Any other person is strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If the addressee cannot be reached or is unknown to you, please inform the sender by return e-mail immediately and delete this e-mail message and destroy all copies. Due to the inherent risks associated with the Internet, we assume no responsibility for unauthorized interception of any Internet communication with you or the transmission of computer viruses. Thank you. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: BLOB
hmm...my eyes are opening here :) I recently built an app that got clustered. Built a doc and image library. Had to put these files on a special share so all members of the cluster have access to them. A Celera SAN thingy actually, works fine and dandy, but one more system to depend on for this. What about speed? If say I get 50 requests for a 1MB document, what would be speedier? fetching from the DB or fetching from the file system? Oracle Text? Part of 9i? Doug - Original Message - From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:46:46 -0400 Subject: Re: BLOB To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All of these are reasons we use the DB for all dynamically managed content, including binary files. Oracle is absolutely fantastic at this these days. For example, Oracle Text is far superior to the Verity implementation in CF, since the full text query can be included in the SQL statement used to retrieve doc info (including version info and many other things that are more difficult to manage with content written to a filesystem). It also means that if multiple CF servers are used or a DR server is brought online, we don't have to worry about where Verity files were written (the index is all in the DB, with the content, where it belongs). A few years ago BLOBS were bad but things have come a long way. >multiuser, continuous data, data integrity, transactions, business rule >implementation, centralized storage and management, not having to manage >millions of files, etc. pretty much every reason why you'd use a db in the >first place. the whole GIS industry is running its enterprise databases on >modern BLOB (spatial) technology. ibm, oracle, ms, esri, mapinfo, etc. have >all spent a bundle on this technology. even freebies like postgres (postGIS >is actually pretty slick) & mySQL are on the bandwagon. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
oracle timestamp java objects in query results,,, wtf?!
Anybody here have any clue what crack-head thought it would be a good idea for queries from Oracle to include Java objects in the results instead of strings? Or how I can resolve this with oracle in a way that won't break platform indpendance of the code by requiring proprietary oracle code? s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1 http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1 http://www.fusiontap.com [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
test
test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: How to tell if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed?
I can verify that your version must be 6,1,0,83762 in order to have the 6.1 updater installed. Rick Mason - Original Message - From: Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:40:48 -0400 Subject: Re: How to tell if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed? To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:19:17 -0400, Bosky, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to identify if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed? > > I went into the CF admin and clicked the system properties tab the version > says: 6,1,0,63958 > You don't have it installed. My version is 6,1,0,83762 with the Updater installed on the J2EE version. I believe the standalone version is the same number, but I don't use it so I don't know for sure. Regards, Dave. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
RE: How to tell if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed?
So can I 6,1,0,83726 _ From: Rick Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: How to tell if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed? I can verify that your version must be 6,1,0,83762 in order to have the 6.1 updater installed. Rick Mason - Original Message - From: Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:40:48 -0400 Subject: Re: How to tell if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed? To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:19:17 -0400, Bosky, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to identify if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed? > > I went into the CF admin and clicked the system properties tab the version > says: 6,1,0,63958 > You don't have it installed. My version is 6,1,0,83762 with the Updater installed on the J2EE version. I believe the standalone version is the same number, but I don't use it so I don't know for sure. Regards, Dave. _ [HYPERLINK "http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=t:4"Todays Threads] [HYPERLINK "http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:179730"This Message] [HYPERLINK "http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4"Subscription] [HYPERLINK "http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=678.598.4"Fast Unsubscribe] [HYPERLINK "http://www.houseoffusion.com/signin/"User Settings] [HYPERLINK "https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?amount=&item_name=House+of+Fusion&bus iness=donations%40houseoffusion.com&undefined_quantity=&cmd=_xclick"Donation s and Support] _ HYPERLINK "http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=34" \n --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.767 / Virus Database: 514 - Release Date: 9/21/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.767 / Virus Database: 514 - Release Date: 9/21/2004 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
RE: test
Coming through here -Original Message- From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: test test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
RE: test
Thanks Tim.. list seemed kind of quiet! > -Original Message- > From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:52 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: test > > Coming through here > > -Original Message- > From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:23 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: test > > test > > > > > > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
RE: Losing Form Scope
From your code segment it looks like you didn't define an enctype, so its probably defaulting to using URL variables instead of FORM fields. Try dumping the URL scope And see if your fields show up. To fix, try putting enctype="multipart/form-data" into the FORM tag and see what happens. -reed _ From: Stan Winchester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 9:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Losing Form Scope I have a form that is submitting to an action page, but for some reason when the action page loads the form scope is gone, so when I look at the debugging information under "Scope Variables" the entire "Form Fields:" section is not even listed. This happens on the live CF5 server and my local CFMX development server. value="YES - Extend the Ad Account" class="button"> Has anyone seen anything like this before? Thank you, Stan Winchester _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: cflocation inside of cflock?
It's my understanding that any time you read from or write to the session scope you should use a cflock. Is that not the case in CFMX? [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: cflocation inside of cflock?
that is NOT the case with CFMX. It IS the case with all other versions of CF likely to be in use out there. Some folks point to a MM KB article that seems to point up the fact that basic locking practices have not changed. The meaning they take from the article is that you have to keep lockiing everything. However a later article (Devnet) by Raymond Camden did a great job of spelling out things really clearly insofar as locking is concerned. A minute or so using the search at MM should turn up both articles, but the bottom line is you do NOT need to lock except to prevent race conditions (that matter). You'll feel quite naughty doing your first naked datasource="application.foo"> but its really a very liberating experience. Cheers, -- --Matt Robertson-- MSB Designs, Inc. mysecretbase.com [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: How to tell if CFMX 6.1 Updater has been installed?
using this: #Server.Coldfusion.ProductVersion# I get: 6,1,0,hf52972_61 any ideas? [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
