Re: Re: OT question - is this real or phishing?
What does this thread have to do with gender? Did I miss something? On Apr 24, 2011 8:51am, Dave Watts wrote: > > are you trying to get every woman on this List offside? If you are then > > you are succeeding very well, two or maybe three in a day. > I find it useful, when reading mailing lists, to keep in mind that > most participants have good intentions, even if they don't express > those intentions that well. I'm not saying that Russ does or doesn't > express his good intentions well, but I think this is good advice for > any mailing list user - assume the best intent for any given post. > > The OP was about a specific domain namespace, not a TLD, you came back > > with a completely irrelevant comment about TLDs. We all know there are > > no checks on TLDs, I was merely pointing out that that is not the case > > for other namespaces. > In Russ' defense - and I find myself a bit nonplussed just typing that > - your comment was not about namespaces, it was about countries: some > countries being more strict than the US when it comes to domain > registration. But that's not an accurate statement because it doesn't > have anything to do with the country in this case. Very few > organizations in the US use the .us namespace. But that namespace is > regulated more strictly than the gTLDs (although perhaps less strictly > than .com.au, as it is possible to get "domain hack" domains within > the .us namespace). > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > http://training.figleaf.com/ > Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on > GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized > instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:343956 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: outlook 2007 and cfmail
Outlook's HTML rendering engine is garbage. Copy/paste the HTML into Word, tweak it and copy/paste the source back into your app. It isn't pretty. http://blogs.sitepoint.com/microsoft-breaks-html-email-rendering-in-outlook/ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa338200.aspx On Apr 5, 2011 3:16pm, Ken Hammond wrote: > I am having the hardest time with outlook 2007 and html/css... If I use a > smaller font (say 6px-8px) for a command it sits the text right next > to it, it won't even superscript it. So... I increase the size to > accommodate that then other mail clients have a HUGE superscripted > services > mark (sm) > Anyone else have these problems? > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:343557 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: RE: Database Lookup - Possible with CF?
It's very easy to do in CF7. However, it appears you don't have the knowledge or desire to learn. You have to possess one. On Mar 11, 2011 8:22am, Ian Vaughan wrote: > Thanks all for your help, I was just investigating if it could be done > with CF7, but it is looking like a long winded process to get anywhere > with it. > If you had CF8+ it is easier because of the new tags but it's looking as > though I need to go down the OO route via /NET webforms or MVC2 which > will be a similar learning curve as trying to get it done in CF7 but > would give better long term prospects > -Original Message- > From: Mark A. Kruger [mailto:mkru...@cfwebtools.com] > Sent: 11 March 2011 14:06 > To: cf-talk > Subject: RE: Database Lookup - Possible with CF? > Ian, > Now you are sort of asking for us to define your functional spec. Getting > your data from a web service is a completely new discussion. Yes it's > possible with CF 7 - but what sort of web server? What are the methods? > What > get's returned? There could be dozens of answers to this question. It is > simply too broad. Investigate web services using WSDL - or possibly your > web > service is a REST type interface, where the data is returned from a POST > request as XML and you parse through it. Either way there's a whole slew > of > possibilities, obstacles and challenges that come with this part of your > process. If you want help start experimenting and give us specific > examples > of errors or hurdles you are trying to overcome. > -Mark > -Original Message- > From: Ian Vaughan [mailto:i.vaug...@neath-porttalbot.gov.uk] > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:02 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: RE: Database Lookup - Possible with CF? > Thanks all. > The data is going to coming from a web service not a database, what steps > in > CF7 do I need to follow to consume an external web service and populate > the > form fields accordingly based on employeeid - is it the same process as > below? > -Original Message- > From: Dean Lawrence [mailto:dean...@gmail.com] > Sent: 10 March 2011 15:04 > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: Database Lookup - Possible with CF? > Ian, > I think your a little confused about a couple of things. First off, > AJAX really has no direct relationship with ColdFusion. AJAX runs on > the client side and ColdFusion runs on the server side. AJAX simply > allows your browser to make additional HTTP requests via JavaScript > instead of having to leave the initial page request. Those additional > HTTP requests could be to a ColdFusion page (.cfc or .cfm), to an > Asp.Net page, or to a .php page, it doesn't really matter. You can > read about how to make an AJAX call using jQuery at > http://api.jquery.com/category/ajax/ > When you make the AJAX call to a processing page (in this case your > CFC), you will want to return JSON data so that jQuery can then use it > to populate your form fields. Once the data has been returned to > jQuery, the server is out of the picture, you will be using jQuery to > then use the data to populate the fields, not ColdFusion (or any other > server side language for that matter). Here is a simple example of how > to step through the returned JSON data to populate a form > rm-fields-more-efficient-approach" > target="_blank">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/635565/walk-json-response-and-populate-fo > rm-fields-more-efficient-approach. > You will notice that in this thread, they are using .php to return the > JSON data. > Back to your CFC. When you make the AJAX call to your CFC, you will > want to return JSON data to jQuery. CF 7 doesn't have any built-in > functions to do this. However, here are two different projects that > you can use to convert the query data. > http://www.epiphantastic.com/cfjson/index.php > http://jsonutil.riaforge.org/ > Both of these project will convert native ColdFusion objects into JSON > data, so you could pass them a query, structure, or array and they > will do the conversion. So in your CFC, you would then return the > converted string, not the original query object. > Hopefully, this clears things up for you and will get you on the right > path. > Dean > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Ian Vaughan > i.vaug...@neath-porttalbot.gov.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi Steve > > > > So my CFC would be like this? > > > > > > getting Employee ID"> > > > > > > > > database" returntype="query"> > > > > select * from employees > > where > > form.empid = getEmp.empid > > > > > > > > > > > > How would I then use a AJAX/Json call to populate the remaining form > > fields from the query in the above CFC? And how does AJAX call the CFC > > on Coldfusion 7? > > > -- > --- > Dean M. Lawrence > INTERNET DATA TECHNOLOGY > p // 888.438.4381 ext. 701 > w // www.ida
Re: Re: RE: I think I'm confused...
Oops... typo. You will only see ".dev" in DEVELOPMENT. Therefore, you'll need to strip it off in development, rather than production. On Feb 24, 2011 8:47am, jqdur...@gmail.com wrote: > Why not use mydomain.com.dev? Then just strip off the ".dev" before using > the server name variable while in production. This doesn't really seem > like that big of a hurdle. > On Feb 24, 2011 8:38am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps a good approach might be to use fictitious domains > > > > locally, since I'm planning to develop sites that are void > > > > of client content until the client works with the app to supply > > > > every piece of data and asset. > > > > > > > > That way, I avoid using any client assets in development locally, > > > > isolating the local-development app from the client-facing app. That > > > > minimizes editing of the host file and I don't have to bother > > > > with making sure client assets, either database or files, get > > > > transferred to the server. > > > > > > > > Sigh... so many possibilities... too many, actually. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Jason Fisher [mailto:ja...@wanax.com] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:15 AM > > > > To: cf-talk > > > > Subject: RE: I think I'm confused... > > > > > > > > > > > > One solution is to have a table of sub-domains that refer to the main > > > > application config table: lookup "domain.com" or "blog.domain.com" or > > > > "www.domain.com" and find the parent config record for "www.domain.com". > > > > In that case, you can then add "dev.domain.com" to the sub-domain table, > > > > but you'd still have to have the dev.domain.com entry in your local > hosts > > > > file for it to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Rick Faircloth" > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:01 AM > > > > To: "cf-talk" cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> > > > > Subject: RE: I think I'm confused... > > > > > > > > I could easily see that working for single sites, > > > > but if I'm developing a "multiple sites, one codebase" > > > > application that depends on reading specific domain > > > > names for setting sites variables, that means I have > > > > to have those dev.mydomain domains in the local hosts > > > > file, as well. > > > > > > > > I could just use the "mydomain" part of the url for > > > > identification, but as someone pointed out earlier > > > > in the MSOC discussion, that wouldn't account for > > > > subdomains, if they're used, such as blog.mydomain, etc. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on this concern? > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Mike Kear [mailto:afpwebwo...@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:04 AM > > > > To: cf-talk > > > > Subject: Re: I think I'm confused... > > > > > > > > I use different domain names. I have www.mydomain.com for the live > > > > server site, and dev.mydomain for my local development sites > > > > > > > > Then in my hosts file, i have the line: > > > > > > > > 127.0.0.1 dev.mydomain > > > > > > > > for each client site i have. With apache, the local dev versions and > > > > remote server versions behave in an identical manner > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Mike Kear > > > > Windsor, NSW, Australia > > > > Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer > > > > AFP Webworks > > > > http://afpwebworks.com > > > > ColdFusion 9 Enterprise, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rick Faircloth > > > > r...@whitestonemedia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ok... thanks Mark and Eric > > > > > > > > > > We need a better solution available to developers > > > > > to be able to switch between local and server DNS. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, a switch of some kind that could be inserted > > > > > into a URL to tell a browser to use a local hosts file > > > > > if that switch is present. > > > > > > > > > > http://local/www.xyz.com > > > > > or > > > > > http://l:www.xyz.com > > > > > > > > > > That would certainly be a *lot* easier than constantly > > > > > editing that hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > But it's good to know that I can use a local DNS file > > > > > that way! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:342566 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: RE: I think I'm confused...
Why not use mydomain.com.dev? Then just strip off the ".dev" before using the server name variable while in production. This doesn't really seem like that big of a hurdle. On Feb 24, 2011 8:38am, Rick Faircloth wrote: > Perhaps a good approach might be to use fictitious domains > locally, since I'm planning to develop sites that are void > of client content until the client works with the app to supply > every piece of data and asset. > That way, I avoid using any client assets in development locally, > isolating the local-development app from the client-facing app. That > minimizes editing of the host file and I don't have to bother > with making sure client assets, either database or files, get > transferred to the server. > Sigh... so many possibilities... too many, actually. > -Original Message- > From: Jason Fisher [mailto:ja...@wanax.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:15 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: RE: I think I'm confused... > One solution is to have a table of sub-domains that refer to the main > application config table: lookup "domain.com" or "blog.domain.com" or > "www.domain.com" and find the parent config record for "www.domain.com". > In that case, you can then add "dev.domain.com" to the sub-domain table, > but you'd still have to have the dev.domain.com entry in your local hosts > file for it to work. > > From: "Rick Faircloth" > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:01 AM > To: "cf-talk" cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> > Subject: RE: I think I'm confused... > I could easily see that working for single sites, > but if I'm developing a "multiple sites, one codebase" > application that depends on reading specific domain > names for setting sites variables, that means I have > to have those dev.mydomain domains in the local hosts > file, as well. > I could just use the "mydomain" part of the url for > identification, but as someone pointed out earlier > in the MSOC discussion, that wouldn't account for > subdomains, if they're used, such as blog.mydomain, etc. > Any thoughts on this concern? > Rick > -Original Message- > From: Mike Kear [mailto:afpwebwo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:04 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: I think I'm confused... > I use different domain names. I have www.mydomain.com for the live > server site, and dev.mydomain for my local development sites > Then in my hosts file, i have the line: > 127.0.0.1 dev.mydomain > for each client site i have. With apache, the local dev versions and > remote server versions behave in an identical manner > Cheers > Mike Kear > Windsor, NSW, Australia > Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer > AFP Webworks > http://afpwebworks.com > ColdFusion 9 Enterprise, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rick Faircloth > r...@whitestonemedia.com> wrote: > > > > Ok... thanks Mark and Eric > > > > We need a better solution available to developers > > to be able to switch between local and server DNS. > > > > Perhaps, a switch of some kind that could be inserted > > into a URL to tell a browser to use a local hosts file > > if that switch is present. > > > > http://local/www.xyz.com > > or > > http://l:www.xyz.com > > > > That would certainly be a *lot* easier than constantly > > editing that hosts file. > > > > But it's good to know that I can use a local DNS file > > that way! > > > > > > > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:342565 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Re: RE: I think I'm confused...
I just confirmed that this idea works. The only downside is your NIC will require static IP addresses. On Feb 24, 2011 8:38am, jqdur...@gmail.com wrote: > Jason Fisher's answer is exactly what I'd do. IIS configuration (assuming > you're using IIS) is actually the more tedious step. Perhaps adding an > additional IP to your NIC and pointing your Hosts records at it would > provide simple configuration of IIS for this monster domain app (routing > by IP rather than host header). I'll test it. > On Feb 24, 2011 8:29am, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > One solution is to have a table of sub-domains that refer to the main > > > > > application config table: lookup "domain.com" or "blog.domain.com" or > > > > > "www.domain.com" and find the parent config record > for "www.domain.com". > > > > > In that case, you can then add "dev.domain.com" to the sub-domain > table, > > > > > but you'd still have to have the dev.domain.com entry in your local > hosts > > > > > file for it to work. > > > > > > > > Boy that's starting to get complicated. I'm already, > > > > even before actually starting, to long for the days > > > > of single, isolated websites. > > > > > > > > I would tend to ignore the subdomains for now, > > > > except for the fact that subdomains using "mobile" > > > > are coming on so strong and are part of my > > > > application-building plan... mobile.xyz.com. > > > > > > > > It seems, especially with the mobile dev world, > > > > that it would be a lot simpler, and perhaps more > > > > efficient in the end, to have one MSOC app for > > > > desktop sites and another MSOC app for the same > > > > site in a mobile version. > > > > > > > > I'm going to have to think on this one for awhile > > > > to come up with a sound, long-term (as long as possible > > > > in this fast changing landscape) plan. I don't want to > > > > get half-way down this path of app development and > > > > then realize I need to start all over. > > > > > > > > Perhaps some of you smart people on the list could > > > > blog (in-depth) about how to go about this (in detail!). > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:342562 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: RE: I think I'm confused...
Jason Fisher's answer is exactly what I'd do. IIS configuration (assuming you're using IIS) is actually the more tedious step. Perhaps adding an additional IP to your NIC and pointing your Hosts records at it would provide simple configuration of IIS for this monster domain app (routing by IP rather than host header). I'll test it. On Feb 24, 2011 8:29am, Rick Faircloth wrote: > > One solution is to have a table of sub-domains that refer to the main > > application config table: lookup "domain.com" or "blog.domain.com" or > > "www.domain.com" and find the parent config record for "www.domain.com". > > In that case, you can then add "dev.domain.com" to the sub-domain table, > > but you'd still have to have the dev.domain.com entry in your local > hosts > > file for it to work. > Boy that's starting to get complicated. I'm already, > even before actually starting, to long for the days > of single, isolated websites. > I would tend to ignore the subdomains for now, > except for the fact that subdomains using "mobile" > are coming on so strong and are part of my > application-building plan... mobile.xyz.com. > It seems, especially with the mobile dev world, > that it would be a lot simpler, and perhaps more > efficient in the end, to have one MSOC app for > desktop sites and another MSOC app for the same > site in a mobile version. > I'm going to have to think on this one for awhile > to come up with a sound, long-term (as long as possible > in this fast changing landscape) plan. I don't want to > get half-way down this path of app development and > then realize I need to start all over. > Perhaps some of you smart people on the list could > blog (in-depth) about how to go about this (in detail!). > Rick > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:342560 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Re: Re: Change in ColdFusion management
I'll believe it [Adobe's renewed commitment] when I see it. And, apparently, that won't be a for a long time. For now, put me on the list of skeptics. On Feb 14, 2011 1:53pm, William Seiter wrote: > Got it, thanks everyone for the google cache link... must be a bad brain > day monday for me ;) > William > -- > William E. Seiter > On Feb 14, 2011, cft...@fusionlink.com wrote: > It's cached by Google.. > http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3G9LdiSkodEJ:www.adrocknaphobia.com/post.cfm/the-modern-age-of-coldfusion+http://www.adrocknaphobia.com/post.cfm/the-modern-age-of-coldfusion&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari&source=www.google.com > - Original Message - > From: William Seiter [mailto:will...@seiter.com] > To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com > Sent: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:08:14 + (GMT) > Subject: Re: Change in ColdFusion management > Anyone have Adam's announcement? I keep trying to access it and get a > blank page. > Thanks, > William > -- > William E. Seiter > On Feb 14, 2011, cft...@fusionlink.com wrote: > In case people don't know and many may not due to the way it was > announced late last friday, there is a debate going on with the recent > change in Adobe's management of Coldfusion. Whether you agree with my > concerns or not, it's important that everyone get a chance to voice their > opinions on this. > Here a the blog posts to look at... > Adam's announcement > http://www.adrocknaphobia.com/post.cfm/the-modern-age-of-coldfusion > My reaction > -there" > target="_blank">http://www.codfusion.com/blog/post.cfm/so-there-s-this-story-about-a-frog-in-boiling-water > -there are comments that add additional problems to this move > Brian Meloche's reaction > http://www.brianmeloche.com/blog/index.cfm/2011/2/12/End-of-another-era > John > ma...@fusionlink.com > twitter: john_mason_ > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:342214 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Re: Accessing Specific CF8 Instances
Wouldn'ta URL rewriter suffice? On Feb 7, 2011 5:19pm, Dave Watts wrote: > > Well, I'm wondering if I can access the instance using an external, > website address. Our developers don't necessarily have > > access to logging into the server. > They don't have to log into the server, they can simply connect to the > listening port: > http://remote.server.url:8300/cfide/administrator/ ... > Alternatively, you could create multiple virtual servers in IIS, map > each to one of those virtual servers, then break the connectors > temporarily, then create the cluster, then map that to the "real" > virtual server, then go back and fix the connectors manually so that > you have two sets working at once. I've done this once, and it was > painful enough that I wouldn't recommend it. > > So, I'm hoping we could do something like this. > > > > http://www.website.com/index.cfm?CFID=x where x is the id of an > instance. > No, there's no mechanism for that. > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > http://training.figleaf.com/ > Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on > GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized > instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341967 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Re: CFImage at 300dpi
Anybody know him personally to check? On Feb 4, 2011 5:41pm, Tony Weeg wrote: > um. no question. we've literally watched his swan song in front of our > faces. > Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate. > On Feb 4, 2011, at 5:46 PM, "Mark A. Kruger" mkru...@cfwebtools.com> > wrote: > > > > Anyone else think Mike might be in trouble? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Firth [mailto:mftr...@att.net] > > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:11 PM > > To: cf-talk > > Subject: Re: CFImage at 300dpi > > > > > > Life aint worth living anymore. Peace out and goodbye everyone > > > > > > > > > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341866 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
