Re: Integrating UPS XML
here http://forums.allaire.com/coldfusion/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=187258 river wrote: > I was wondering if anybody has experience integrating the UPS XML with CF > applications. I am not quite convinced that their documentation is not > accurate enough... Can anybody share the code?? > > So far I have tried CFHTTP or MSXML but to no avail. I have looked in the > allaire CF forum, but I couldn't find a good solution. All those threads > stop before a complete solution... > > ++ > https://www.ups.com/ups.app/xml/Rate";> > name="input"> > > > #cfhttp.FileContent# > > This returns an XML error saying that it has a problem with > AccessLicenseNumber. I am sure I am supplying the right number and such > since those are the ones I got from UPS site. > > I appreciate any help. > Thanks, > > ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: encryption question PART 2 HEHE
You might want to look at this http://jenghis.thirdtier.com/crypto/ which uses Strong Crypto. This URL is rather outdated and the lattest version I have written supports all the AES systems as well as various forms of public key crypto and exchange. Its also super fast so its fine for little things like credit cards but it also functional for text as long as the bible. Also we just licensed RSA crypto packages and we can support those as well. R "Jackson Moore (CFTalk)" wrote: > Pooh Bear > > I used a similar technique in my custom tag cf_cryp that's in the > developer's gallery. I actually use the encrypt() function in CF and > then do various operations to convert characters, shift bits and flip > nibbles. I also added a checksum (also encoded) so I could validate > the data after it was decrypted. BUT, it is still not secure when > compared with 128-bit RSA encryption. > > True, a user would be hard pressed to figure out your (or my) > particular encryption algorithm, but "real" hackers will run a few of > your (or my) strings through software programs designed to recognize > patterns such as yours and break the code. It may take some trial > and error, but they can and will break it. > > I use cf_cryp, not to store credit card numbers or other sensitive > information, but, for example, to encrypt values I use in hidden form > fields. This helps ensure that the values are correct when I process > the form. But - I can't be absolutely positive that someone hasn't > broken my code. > > cf_cryp also has an error reporting mechanism that allows you to > detect the trial/error method and determine if the decrypted string > has been tampered with. By storing and analyzing this information, > you can see if someone is trying to break the algorithm and even lock > them out (again, not foolproof). > > HTH > > Jackson Moore > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:20:51 -0500, Pooh Bear wrote: > >hey, i'm the Original Inquirer. heh, kinda like that title. ermm > >anyways, > >like i said, the code turns 4665775886868576 into > >"hkjsdhk987697834^*&^@@@Kj=-018^%13534kljdsa986(*@*&(@# dsjfkhk" > >junk. > >someone said that someone could get the pattern, but i think it is > >impossible, since part of the encryption uses ASC or Char to change > >characters (only certain letters according to what the "ith" number > >is), and > >they will never know at which point i used that transformation, or > >how many > >times. MUWHAHAHA! or what else I did (i also used mathematical > >calculations, string appends, and other string functions). I mean > >every > >outcome is sooo different finding a pattern is impossible. And > >every > >outcome comes doesn't have the same amount of character lengths. > >like, the > >only possible way to figure it out is to look at the CF code itself, > >and > >then to work it backwards (which took me a while to figure out too > >bahehehe) > > > >Am i right/wrong in my assumption? > > > ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: Encryption Question PART 2
Pooh, You may be able to obfuscate your information from most people but anyone with some time and a decent system will most likely have a easy go with your algorithm. What you are doing sounds like very simple encryption scheme and is rife for frequency analysis which would not be that hard since you gave me both plain text and cypher text. Optimally a analyst would want multiple copies of plain text and cypher text but I think a good crypto person could get reasonable close via what you have here. Also the most likely way some one get your crypto system is to get access to your algorithm which I am sure based on what you say would allow them to decrypt anything you create which makes for a very weak crypto scheme. Your best bet it is to use something like BlowFish or AES, DES, TIPLEDES, etc which are well understood systems and are ethier very hard to crack or have not been publicly cracked yet. Cheers, Robi Pooh Bear wrote: > hey, i'm the Original Inquirer. heh, kinda like that title. ermm anyways, > like i said, the code turns 4665775886868576 into > "hkjsdhk987697834^*&^@@@Kj=-018^%13534kljdsa986(*@*&(@# dsjfkhk" junk. > someone said that someone could get the pattern, but i think it is > impossible, since part of the encryption uses ASC or Char to change > characters (only certain letters according to what the "ith" number is), and > they will never know at which point i used that transformation, or how many > times. MUWHAHAHA! or what else I did (i also used mathematical > calculations, string appends, and other string functions). I mean every > outcome is sooo different finding a pattern is impossible. And every > outcome comes doesn't have the same amount of character lengths. like, the > only possible way to figure it out is to look at the CF code itself, and > then to work it backwards (which took me a while to figure out too bahehehe) > > Am i right/wrong in my assumption? > ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: .Net and ColdFusion
Very cool. Barnes told me it was not out. Thanks! Ill have to go get that. R John Lucas wrote: > As a side, the book is out. I have a copy sitting here that I ordered from > bookpool.com and received two weeks ago. It shipped same day. I believe the > picture says coming soon, but the availability says its in-stock. > > -Original Message- ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: .Net and ColdFusion
The book is not out yet. As for .NET well you could use SOAP,and BizTalk (funny side note we wrote the first BizTalk server in June 4, 1999 with ColdFusion, WDDX, and XSLT to translate the WDDX to XDR/BizTalk) but you have to use a older version of SOAP not 1.2 since the .NET framework is lagging a bit and their are some scheme interpretation issues which is a little funny since MS is one of the motivateing forces behind SOAP. Since SOAP is XML and since XML is in general easy to work with and is platform independant XML makes the most sensible approach to a .Net integration all though you should be able to easily call and wrap the various COM interfaces to it from CF. Or you could use C# and call it. Frankly I have not paid much attention to .NET in that most of our client base will not touch a product until its been in production for a year or so and they generally use some flavour of UNIX so I am sure there is some one on this list who would be a better source for you. I am going to have a series of articles up about creating webservices with CF at xml.granularity.com in about a month or so. You might want to check that out. Robi John Lucas wrote: > Chapter 22 of Simon Horwith's Professional Coldfusion 5.0 (WROX) is > dedicated Web Services, SOAP, and the .NET Framework, so my guess is yes. I > haven't actually read the chapter though. > > http://www.bookpool.com/.x/38jyhe4vz8/sm/1861004540 > > John Lucas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 9:42 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: .Net and ColdFusion > > I don't know exactly, but since .NET will be based on open-standards, like > XML and SOAP, I don't see why you couldn't use the 2 together. > > That's the theory, anyway. (A lot .NET is basically theory at this point > anyway) > > Scott > - > Scott Brady > http://www.scottbrady.net/ > ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: Contract work
www.guru.com www.monster.com "Michael T. Tangorre" wrote: > Anyone know of any good sites that lists people looking to hire cold > fusion > programmers on a contract basis? > > Mike > > ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: Paranoid programming...
compiled code is easy to decompile unless people obfuscate the code and few know how. Steve Nelson wrote: > I am brand new to java cfx's, but you could do it in Java in about 10 > lines of code, it'd be easy. I have no idea how to setup java cfx's in > Solaris, but I'm willing to bet it's almost identical to NT. I'll put a > qarbon tutorial on secretagents.com on how to do it in NT. Are you > interested? > > Steve > > "Larry W. Virden" wrote: > > > > From: "Chris Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > What about hardcoding the username and password in a CFX tag? > > It is > > compiled, so it won't be simple to extract. > > > > Might work - except I have been unable for the past 18+ months to > > find any info about writing cfx's for Solaris... > > > > -- > > Larry W. Virden mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://www.purl.org/net/lvirden/> > > Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this > > posting > > should be construed as representing my employer's opinions. > > > > > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ > > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a >message with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Steve Nelson > http://www.SecretAgents.com > Tools for Fusebox Developers > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message >with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
cfschedule and either cfhttp, cfftp Marcus wrote: > I have an odd problem, or at least I hope so. > > I need to post a wddx packet automagically to another website/page. How do I > do this without user intervention? > > Marcus > > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message >with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XSLT And CF
Brian, Not sure what you want to do but we wrote the first XSLT parser for CF and just released GIAXT2 which is a hyper fast java XSLT parser (we also have a XPATH, DOM, WDDX/DOM, SOAP, and XQL parser). Also unlike most of the other people who have done things with CFOBJECT or MSXML with com our runs on and os that supports Java, is faster than MS XML based technologies, and supports the lattest version of XSLT, DOM, XML, and XPATH while the MS XML parsers do not. Why do you not look at http://www.granularity.net/technologies/ and you can get some ideas on our product offerings. BTW.. our xml technologies are being used by companies like SCHWAB, Standards and Poors, Deutsche Bank, several other Fourtune 1000 companies. If you like I can get you 30 day trial licenses and a support license for free if you email me. Robi Well not sure what you want to Brian bouldernet wrote: > Hey we're using CF to pull a bunch of data and I wanted to see if anyone has > sucessfully integrated CF with XSLT? > > -Brian > > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message >with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CF Version Control??
If you dont have money you should check out something like CVS (there are many freeware version s and clients for most OS's). If you have MS Visual Studio use VSS, it you have allot of money use Star Team. Frankly if you are not using at least CVS for version control then you might as well not even use anything in my opinion. R S R wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out a way to prevent multiple people from working on > the same file at the same time. I was looking into Dreamweaver's Check > in/Check Out system and its not fool proof, because I can override someone > else's Check Out and copy over it. Is there a way through CF Admin to make > all CF files modifiable by only one person at a time? Kind of like the way > it works if you were to open a Word document and your buddy tries to open it > up while you have it open and it says 'Document is currently in use by > another user. Would you like to view it as a read-only file?' > > Thanks > > SR > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message >with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
