Re: Can you do this in SQL using CF?
I have some processes that work on 100's of thousands of records daily. What they do is important but only parts of the processes are done in a way that needs logging. So, instead of filling my transaction log with all of these events and requiring a large transaction log, I would rather ignore some of the process. One thing I have done is use the truncate command to delete all the records in a temp table. It helps but I want to reduce the logging even more. Oh yeah, I'm also a bit of a freak. :-\ On 2/1/06, Jim Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are certain operations with the bcp utility which can be minimally > logged, but I don't know of any way to not log general database > activityit kind of defeats the purpose of having the transaction log. > Why would you want to do that? > ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231104 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Can you do this in SQL using CF?
There are certain operations with the bcp utility which can be minimally logged, but I don't know of any way to not log general database activityit kind of defeats the purpose of having the transaction log. Why would you want to do that? On 2/1/06, Phill B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I usually try using a subject that is close to what I'm looking for > but I never get a respons. So I decided to be a little more vague. > > My question is Is there a way to prevent an SQL update statement > from logging to the > transaction file? > > Some thing like "set noTransactionLog"? > > -- > Phil > > ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231064 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Can you do this in SQL using CF?
> I would think that there would be an option to bypass the transaction > log. I can't find anything using Google or the MS web site though. > > A list full of brainiacs and not an idea amongst them. Curses! ;-) You could try an MSSQL forum, like sqlservercentral.com, probably have better luck there. [INFO] -- Access Manager: This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A2 ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231040 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Can you do this in SQL using CF?
I would think that there would be an option to bypass the transaction log. I can't find anything using Google or the MS web site though. A list full of brainiacs and not an idea amongst them. Curses! ;-) On 2/1/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I too was hoping you would be answered, since I have no idea. > > On 2/1/06, Phill B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I usually try using a subject that is close to what I'm looking for > > but I never get a respons. So I decided to be a little more vague. > > > > My question is Is there a way to prevent an SQL update statement > > from logging to the > > transaction file? > > > > Some thing like "set noTransactionLog"? > > ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231038 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Can you do this in SQL using CF?
I too was hoping you would be answered, since I have no idea. On 2/1/06, Phill B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I usually try using a subject that is close to what I'm looking for > but I never get a respons. So I decided to be a little more vague. > > My question is Is there a way to prevent an SQL update statement > from logging to the > transaction file? > > Some thing like "set noTransactionLog"? ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231025 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Can you do this in SQL using CF?
I usually try using a subject that is close to what I'm looking for but I never get a respons. So I decided to be a little more vague. My question is Is there a way to prevent an SQL update statement from logging to the transaction file? Some thing like "set noTransactionLog"? -- Phil ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:231023 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
