RE: Gmail highlighting
This is good, but I would do the following instead:
In the CSS put...
..searchHighlight {background-color: #00}
In the HTML...
You can span class=searchHighlighthighlight/span text within search
results.
The reason is that there should only be one instance of an ID in an html
document and the name of your CSS class should be semantic instead of
specific so that when the client asks you to highlight in green, you can
change your class attributes and everything will still make sense!
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Gmail highlighting
Wrap the search result word in the span tag shown below
in the CSS put...
#yellow {background-color: #00}
in the HTML...
you can SPAN id=yellowhighlight/SPANtext within search results.
Brook
At 10:00 AM 3/11/2005, you wrote:
Those with Gmail will notice the interesting turn on/off highlighting
feature after doing a text search of the mail.
Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a
result set using Cold Fusion?
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198637
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Gmail highlighting
Exactly what I was begining to type :) We're going through a lot of
un-needed code revisions to undo that which should not have been done.
Everything is an ID in our CSS and it is realy really messed up.
Adam H
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:38:45 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is good, but I would do the following instead:
In the CSS put...
..searchHighlight {background-color: #00}
In the HTML...
You can span class=searchHighlighthighlight/span text within search
results.
The reason is that there should only be one instance of an ID in an html
document and the name of your CSS class should be semantic instead of
specific so that when the client asks you to highlight in green, you can
change your class attributes and everything will still make sense!
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Gmail highlighting
Wrap the search result word in the span tag shown below
in the CSS put...
#yellow {background-color: #00}
in the HTML...
you can SPAN id=yellowhighlight/SPANtext within search results.
Brook
At 10:00 AM 3/11/2005, you wrote:
Those with Gmail will notice the interesting turn on/off highlighting
feature after doing a text search of the mail.
Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a
result set using Cold Fusion?
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198643
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for highlighting. Not span. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - - ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198645 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context? - Calvin -Original Message- From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for highlighting. Not span. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - - ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198650 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
At first I would say yes, EM would be a good candidate, however I would reserve EM for larger code blocks. Like a note, a warning, etc. This part states you might better use strong for it. But honestly, I wouldn't care while both have their semantics in letting content stand out. Thus, it would be logical to define that em emphasizes the enclosed text with respect to the text in the enclosing element and should be rendered in a manner that reflects this; whereas strong (renamed to e.g. key or highlight, if we give up continuity, as planned for XHTML 2.0) would indicate its content as key word or phrase in the context of the entire document, to appear as highlighted when possible, and to gain special weight in indexing. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - -Original Message- From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context? - Calvin -Original Message- From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for highlighting. Not span. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - - ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198652 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Gmail highlighting
So, say, in terms of a wiki... strong would be viable for terms while em would suffice for meta-information like last-updated-by: Blah blah blah strongwiki term/strong blah blah blah strongthe end of the world/strong blah blah blah strongDouglas Adams/strong emEntry created by Fred Smith, last updated on March 19, 1963, by John Anderson/em In other words, strong would act as a callout and em would be used to provide details for the entire entry. Is that the idea? J On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:33:22 +0100, Micha Schopman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At first I would say yes, EM would be a good candidate, however I would reserve EM for larger code blocks. Like a note, a warning, etc. This part states you might better use strong for it. But honestly, I wouldn't care while both have their semantics in letting content stand out. Thus, it would be logical to define that em emphasizes the enclosed text with respect to the text in the enclosing element and should be rendered in a manner that reflects this; whereas strong (renamed to e.g. key or highlight, if we give up continuity, as planned for XHTML 2.0) would indicate its content as key word or phrase in the context of the entire document, to appear as highlighted when possible, and to gain special weight in indexing. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - -Original Message- From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context? - Calvin -Original Message- From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for highlighting. Not span. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - - ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198653 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
So, in that scenario, I would consider the following:
In the CSS put...
#searchResults strong {background-color: #00}
In the HTML...
div id=searchResults
You can stronghighlight/strong text within search results.
/div
This results in less code! Of course you can only have one search results
div using this solution.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
At first I would say yes, EM would be a good candidate, however I would
reserve EM for larger code blocks. Like a note, a warning, etc.
This part states you might better use strong for it. But honestly, I
wouldn't care while both have their semantics in letting content stand
out.
Thus, it would be logical to define that em emphasizes the enclosed
text with respect to the text in the enclosing element and should be
rendered in a manner that reflects this; whereas strong (renamed to e.g.
key or highlight, if we give up continuity, as planned for XHTML 2.0)
would indicate its content as key word or phrase in the context of the
entire document, to appear as highlighted when possible, and to gain
special weight in indexing.
Micha Schopman
Project Manager
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
-
Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren
de interactie met uw doelgroep.
Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer
informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl
-
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for
highlighting. Not span.
Micha Schopman
Project Manager
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
-
Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren
de interactie met uw doelgroep.
Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer
informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl
-
-
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198654
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
Yes, that is the idea. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - -Original Message- From: Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:52 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Gmail highlighting So, say, in terms of a wiki... strong would be viable for terms while em would suffice for meta-information like last-updated-by: Blah blah blah strongwiki term/strong blah blah blah strongthe end of the world/strong blah blah blah strongDouglas Adams/strong emEntry created by Fred Smith, last updated on March 19, 1963, by John Anderson/em In other words, strong would act as a callout and em would be used to provide details for the entire entry. Is that the idea? J On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:33:22 +0100, Micha Schopman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At first I would say yes, EM would be a good candidate, however I would reserve EM for larger code blocks. Like a note, a warning, etc. This part states you might better use strong for it. But honestly, I wouldn't care while both have their semantics in letting content stand out. Thus, it would be logical to define that em emphasizes the enclosed text with respect to the text in the enclosing element and should be rendered in a manner that reflects this; whereas strong (renamed to e.g. key or highlight, if we give up continuity, as planned for XHTML 2.0) would indicate its content as key word or phrase in the context of the entire document, to appear as highlighted when possible, and to gain special weight in indexing. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - -Original Message- From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context? - Calvin -Original Message- From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for highlighting. Not span. Micha Schopman Project Manager Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388 KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380 - Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren de interactie met uw doelgroep. Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl - - ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198656 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Gmail highlighting
Unless you make 'searchResults' a class, rather than an ID. ; )
cheers,
barneyb
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:53:53 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, in that scenario, I would consider the following:
In the CSS put...
#searchResults strong {background-color: #00}
In the HTML...
div id=searchResults
You can stronghighlight/strong text within search results.
/div
This results in less code! Of course you can only have one search results
div using this solution.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
At first I would say yes, EM would be a good candidate, however I would
reserve EM for larger code blocks. Like a note, a warning, etc.
This part states you might better use strong for it. But honestly, I
wouldn't care while both have their semantics in letting content stand
out.
Thus, it would be logical to define that em emphasizes the enclosed
text with respect to the text in the enclosing element and should be
rendered in a manner that reflects this; whereas strong (renamed to e.g.
key or highlight, if we give up continuity, as planned for XHTML 2.0)
would indicate its content as key word or phrase in the context of the
entire document, to appear as highlighted when possible, and to gain
special weight in indexing.
Micha Schopman
Project Manager
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
-
Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren
de interactie met uw doelgroep.
Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer
informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl
-
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for
highlighting. Not span.
Micha Schopman
Project Manager
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
-
Modern Media, Making You Interact Smarter. Onze oplossingen verbeteren
de interactie met uw doelgroep.
Wilt u meer omzet, lagere kosten of een beter service niveau? Voor meer
informatie zie www.modernmedia.nl
-
-
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198732
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Gmail highlighting
Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a result set using Cold Fusion? cf_highlight should work for you. http://www.cfdev.com/products/productdetail.cfm/id/1018 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198596 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Gmail highlighting
Those with Gmail will notice the interesting turn on/off highlighting feature after doing a text search of the mail. Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a result set using Cold Fusion? ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198430 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
Re: Gmail highlighting
Wrap the search result word in the span tag shown below
in the CSS put...
#yellow {background-color: #00}
in the HTML...
you can SPAN id=yellowhighlight/SPANtext within search results.
Brook
At 10:00 AM 3/11/2005, you wrote:
Those with Gmail will notice the interesting turn on/off highlighting
feature after doing a text search of the mail.
Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a
result set using Cold Fusion?
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198434
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
CFMX7 has these attributes of the CFSearch tag: ContextHighlightBegin Specifies the HTML tag to prepend to the search term within the returned documents. This attribute must be used in conjunction with ContextHighlightEnd to highlight the resulting search terms. The default HTML tag is b, which highlights search terms using bold type. ContextHighlightEnd Specifies the HTML tag to append to the search term within the returned documents. -Original Message- From: Les Irvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Gmail highlighting Those with Gmail will notice the interesting turn on/off highlighting feature after doing a text search of the mail. Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a result set using Cold Fusion? ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198441 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
RE: Gmail highlighting
This CFDJ article discusses another method: http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=42092DE=1 Yellow Highlights of Search Listing Results After getting the above indexing working, highlighting the search results in yellow is actually the easy part. By performing a ReplaceNoCase on the search results for the searched-for phrase (we do this on both title and summary information, but that's up to you) and replacing that phrase with one wrapped with a standard HTML font style=background-color: yellow;/font call (remember the all parameter on ReplaceNoCase!), you have effectively highlighted the search phrase in your results. -Original Message- From: Les Irvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Gmail highlighting Those with Gmail will notice the interesting turn on/off highlighting feature after doing a text search of the mail. Has anyone come up with an effective way to highlight a search term in a result set using Cold Fusion? ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:198442 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
