Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-28 Thread Massimo Foti

Actually, I think the muddy water is about what is an application...

Massimo


Brian Hogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 What is the difference between two CF applications on my PC against two
 applications on a Hosted PC?
 Please note that I did not say both applications are mine ... they could
be.
 This seems very muddy water.




~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-28 Thread Aaron Rouse

What I am curious about is after this scare is over, just how many
developers have decided to move on to another language.  Seems like a lot of
people out there are deciding it is time to pick up another language for
fear of CF being too much money or not around in the future.  So even if MM
decides at the last minute not to go up in pricing, how many people did they
end up loosing from all of this, but do they really care, I doubt it.

- Original Message -
From: Massimo Foti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification


 Actually, I think the muddy water is about what is an application...

 Massimo


 Brian Hogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
  What is the difference between two CF applications on my PC against two
  applications on a Hosted PC?
  Please note that I did not say both applications are mine ... they could
 be.
  This seems very muddy water.





~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-28 Thread Ken Wilson

 What I am curious about is after this scare is over, just how many
 developers have decided to move on to another language.



Sounds like more work for those of us left behind.  :)


Ken

~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-28 Thread Aaron Rouse

True, but also sounds like less CF work for people like me.  The people that
I do small sites for, already do not want to pay a premium for CF and
if/when the pricing goes up they will not pay  for it period.  Just means I
get to code their sites in something else, personally I would prefer not to,
but I also want to bring in a pay check.

I doubt my day job is going to get rid of CF, however if they have to pay a
great deal more for the licensing I could easily see them just staying with
the current version of CF that they are running on all of their servers and
then slowly getting sites redone in ASP since we already do ASP there.

- Original Message -
From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification


  What I am curious about is after this scare is over, just how many
  developers have decided to move on to another language.



 Sounds like more work for those of us left behind.  :)


 Ken


~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-28 Thread Wayne Putterill


- Original Message -
From: Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification


 True, but also sounds like less CF work for people like me.  The people
that
 I do small sites for, already do not want to pay a premium for CF and
 if/when the pricing goes up they will not pay  for it period.  Just means
I
 get to code their sites in something else, personally I would prefer not
to,
 but I also want to bring in a pay check.

 I doubt my day job is going to get rid of CF, however if they have to pay
a
 great deal more for the licensing I could easily see them just staying
with
 the current version of CF that they are running on all of their servers
and
 then slowly getting sites redone in ASP since we already do ASP there.

Thats the big problem now, I have been happy to use CF for the past three
years in building small sites as I believed it had a real future ahead of
it. It seems that MM are abandoning the small developer in favour of chasing
the enterprise market - my customers are never going to be able to justify
that sort of expense on a server. So the next contract I get I will have to
think about using ASP, or more likely PHP, simply because they seem to have
a future in the markets I deal in.

Maybe we should organise a symbolic demonstration to show MM our feelings on
this matter - perhaps if nobody posts to the list for a day they may wake up
and realise what they are doing.

 - Original Message -
 From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 10:37 AM
 Subject: RE: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification


   What I am curious about is after this scare is over, just how many
   developers have decided to move on to another language.
 
 
 
  Sounds like more work for those of us left behind.  :)
 
 
  Ken
 
 

~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-28 Thread Aaron Rouse

That might do something, but I really think MM does not care.

- Original Message -
From: Wayne Putterill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification



 - Original Message -
 From: Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 5:16 PM
 Subject: Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification


  True, but also sounds like less CF work for people like me.  The people
 that
  I do small sites for, already do not want to pay a premium for CF and
  if/when the pricing goes up they will not pay  for it period.  Just
means
 I
  get to code their sites in something else, personally I would prefer not
 to,
  but I also want to bring in a pay check.
 
  I doubt my day job is going to get rid of CF, however if they have to
pay
 a
  great deal more for the licensing I could easily see them just staying
 with
  the current version of CF that they are running on all of their servers
 and
  then slowly getting sites redone in ASP since we already do ASP there.

 Thats the big problem now, I have been happy to use CF for the past three
 years in building small sites as I believed it had a real future ahead of
 it. It seems that MM are abandoning the small developer in favour of
chasing
 the enterprise market - my customers are never going to be able to justify
 that sort of expense on a server. So the next contract I get I will have
to
 think about using ASP, or more likely PHP, simply because they seem to
have
 a future in the markets I deal in.

 Maybe we should organise a symbolic demonstration to show MM our feelings
on
 this matter - perhaps if nobody posts to the list for a day they may wake
up
 and realise what they are doing.

  - Original Message -
  From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 10:37 AM
  Subject: RE: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification
 
 
What I am curious about is after this scare is over, just how many
developers have decided to move on to another language.
  
  
  
   Sounds like more work for those of us left behind.  :)
  
  
   Ken
  
  
 

~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-27 Thread Jeff Whatcott

Yesterday we sent an email to Macromedia ColdFusion hosting partners
regarding the new Hosting Service Provider Edition of ColdFusion Server 5
that was cross-posted to this list. The information in the email was
unclear, which caused some confusion about ColdFusion Server 5 pricing and
licensing policies in general. On behalf of the team, first I want to
apologize for any confusion caused by the email.

ColdFusion Server 5 is a very exciting release. The focus has been on
building features that developers have been requesting for years. You'll
find support for user defined functions, incremental page output, charting,
a new administrator, and major performance increases among other cool
features. At the same time that we've been building enhancements, we've been
very focused on quality, and so far, the feedback in the beta program has
been very positive. 

With the exception of the Hosting Service Provider Edition, we're not
changing the basic licensing policies or pricing. As a merged company, we're
focused on the needs of ColdFusion developers more than ever. Macromedia is
deeply committed to the ColdFusion community and the vision behind
ColdFusion Server, and we're making a significant investment in the product.
We understand that having high quality hosting options is important to
developers, and one of our focuses for this release is to expand the number
of service providers participating in our hosting partner program.

When we announce formally on Monday, there will be a lot more information
available about the new release on our Web site. To help clarify the Hosting
Service Provider Edition policies, we've posted an FAQ about the new edition
at:

http://www.allaire.com/products/coldfusion/cf5hostingfaq.html

If you have more questions or concerns about this new edition, please feel
free to drop me a note. I'm looking forward to your feedback on ColdFusion
Server 5!

Jeff Whatcott 
Director, ColdFusion Product Marketing
Macromedia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-27 Thread Christopher Cortes

Hey Michael,

Can you please create a new list named:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

until Monday, when MM clarifies?

J.K - Chris

!---
Christopher Cortes   |Coming Q3 2001:
Consultant   |
Stonebridge Technologies, Inc.   | ’Optimizing ColdFusion’
 Putting Technology To Work  |   By
Visit us at www.sbti.com |   Christopher Cortes
Ofc: 713.985.6244 cel: 281.235.6100  | www.osborne.com
---!


~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification

2001-04-27 Thread Jon Hall

Ok, what this means for my company and for Macromedia is...

According to the FAQ, we can purchase Pro or Enterprise to host our own
applications and be within the license. So our companies bottom line is not
really affected as far as development goes.
However, I do not see us continuing to offer CF as a standard feature of our
hosting packages. At least for version 5. I predict there will be quite a
few hosts that provide CF 4.5 as part of a hosting package for a long time,
and if they offer CF5 shared hosting  at all it will be at a premium. We
will upgrade to CF5, but not for all of our servers, and probably never will
upgrade a couple past 4.5. The costs are astronomical to offer CF as a
standard feature anymore.

Who got hurt? The little guy looking for CF5 shared hosting. The development
companies are safe. Perhaps the bigger hosters are safe too, with volume
discounts and all.

I got started in CF because my web host offered it as a standard feature, so
I played around with it, and a couple of years later here I am a CF
developer. It seems sad to me that a lot of new guys wont get the chance I
did. As a web host puts up new servers, CF will be slowly phased out. Either
we buy a license for 4.5 or pay through the nose for CF5. Why bother? Maybe
1 out of every 20 of our current sites use CF. Most people cant even figure
out FrontPage ;-)

Macromedia in one fell swoop, just cut a whole lot of little guys out.

Perhaps what Macromedia is really trying to do is sell more copies of pro
and enterprise. It is now more cost effective to rent a server or colocate
and put CF on it yourself. Still cutting out the new guys though :-(

jon
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Whatcott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 6:10 PM
Subject: Hosting Service Provider Edition Clarification


 Yesterday we sent an email to Macromedia ColdFusion hosting partners
 regarding the new Hosting Service Provider Edition of ColdFusion Server 5
 that was cross-posted to this list. The information in the email was
 unclear, which caused some confusion about ColdFusion Server 5 pricing and
 licensing policies in general. On behalf of the team, first I want to
 apologize for any confusion caused by the email.

 ColdFusion Server 5 is a very exciting release. The focus has been on
 building features that developers have been requesting for years. You'll
 find support for user defined functions, incremental page output,
charting,
 a new administrator, and major performance increases among other cool
 features. At the same time that we've been building enhancements, we've
been
 very focused on quality, and so far, the feedback in the beta program has
 been very positive.

 With the exception of the Hosting Service Provider Edition, we're not
 changing the basic licensing policies or pricing. As a merged company,
we're
 focused on the needs of ColdFusion developers more than ever. Macromedia
is
 deeply committed to the ColdFusion community and the vision behind
 ColdFusion Server, and we're making a significant investment in the
product.
 We understand that having high quality hosting options is important to
 developers, and one of our focuses for this release is to expand the
number
 of service providers participating in our hosting partner program.

 When we announce formally on Monday, there will be a lot more information
 available about the new release on our Web site. To help clarify the
Hosting
 Service Provider Edition policies, we've posted an FAQ about the new
edition
 at:

 http://www.allaire.com/products/coldfusion/cf5hostingfaq.html

 If you have more questions or concerns about this new edition, please feel
 free to drop me a note. I'm looking forward to your feedback on ColdFusion
 Server 5!

 Jeff Whatcott
 Director, ColdFusion Product Marketing
 Macromedia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists


~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists