JAVA 1.4 vs CFMX Java

2003-10-24 Thread Robert Everland III
I know I can swap out which Java to use, but is it better to use the latest version (for speed's sake not so much compatibility) as opposed to the version that comes with CFMX. Just curious if I can get a little more juice out of CFMX.

Bob Everland
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: JAVA 1.4 vs CFMX Java

2003-10-24 Thread Nathan Strutz
Generally speaking, the newer versions of sun's java are better than the
older versions. CFMX 6.0 comes with version 1.3.1, and CFMX 6.1 comes with
version 1.4.2, currently the latest version. If you haven't upgraded to 6.1,
I highly recommend it. If you have, you already have the latest version, and
therefore can't get much better. If you're on CFMX 6.0, you may have luck
upgrading to 1.4.2, but be ready to roll back if you notice things not
working or responding as fast, as CFMX 6.0 was engineered with 1.3.1 in
mind.

I have heard of someone having success with IBM's java (tends to be faster
than sun's), but YMMV.

-nathan strutz

-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 5:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: JAVA 1.4 vs CFMX Java

I know I can swap out which Java to use, but is it better to use the latest
version (for speed's sake not so much compatibility) as opposed to the
version that comes with CFMX. Just curious if I can get a little more juice
out of CFMX.

Bob Everland

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: JAVA 1.4 vs CFMX Java

2003-10-24 Thread Dave Carabetta
Generally speaking, the newer versions of sun's java are better than the
older versions. CFMX 6.0 comes with version 1.3.1, and CFMX 6.1 comes with
version 1.4.2, currently the latest version. If you haven't upgraded to 
6.1,
I highly recommend it. If you have, you already have the latest version, 
and
therefore can't get much better. If you're on CFMX 6.0, you may have luck
upgrading to 1.4.2, but be ready to roll back if you notice things not
working or responding as fast, as CFMX 6.0 was engineered with 1.3.1 in
mind.

I have heard of someone having success with IBM's java (tends to be faster
than sun's), but YMMV.


Technically speaking, the latest version of Sun's java is 1.4.2_02, which 
contains tons of bug fixes from
the initial 1.4.2 release.

Regards,
Dave.


 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: JAVA 1.4 vs CFMX Java

2003-10-24 Thread Samuel R. Neff
I thought CFMX gold including IBM's JVM and some people switched to SUN's
JVM to correct HTTPS limitations?Perhaps I have that backwards...

I've used CFMX gold with the included JVM and with BEA's JRockit.I didn't
have any issues with JRockit on a development computer but I heard some
reports of issues under heavy load.

Sam

---
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Charts: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
---

 -Original Message-
 From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:22 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: JAVA 1.4 vs CFMX Java
 
 Generally speaking, the newer versions of sun's java are 
 better than the older versions. CFMX 6.0 comes with version 
 1.3.1, and CFMX 6.1 comes with version 1.4.2, currently the 
 latest version. If you haven't upgraded to 6.1, I highly 
 recommend it. If you have, you already have the latest 
 version, and therefore can't get much better. If you're on 
 CFMX 6.0, you may have luck upgrading to 1.4.2, but be ready 
 to roll back if you notice things not working or responding 
 as fast, as CFMX 6.0 was engineered with 1.3.1 in mind.
 
 I have heard of someone having success with IBM's java (tends 
 to be faster than sun's), but YMMV.
 
 -nathan strutz

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]