Re: Question regarding CFMX 6.2 - UPDATE

2004-02-27 Thread Josen Ruiseco
Ben,

Any word on whether or not work is being done on the "Could not connect to 
JRUN server" error. This issue seems to affect a lot of folks and there is 
yet no word from Macromedia on the issue.

Regards,

Josen
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2 - UPDATE

2004-02-27 Thread Steven Erat
Ian,

Have you tried the instructions in this technote?:

ColdFusion MX: Creating a JDBC data source for DB2

http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/tn18337.htm

Specifically, the requirement for the connect string parameters is unusual,
whereas other JDBC datasource types don't need one.

Also,

- If you submit the datasource in the CFAdmin after completing the
parameters, what is the error message that is displayed (in red font, I
think)?

- Are you using a packageName that exists already?  

- Are you creating a new package?

- Does that user in the DSN have privileges to create or modify packages on
the db?

- Are you continuing to use createdefaultpackage=true after the initial
configuration?

Thanks

Steven Erat

  _  

From: Ian Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2 - UPDATE

Hi Ben

Any more news on this problem ?? any workarounds available ? 

Ian

-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 24 February 2004 12:54
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2

No, but I'll check.

--- Ben

  _  

From: Ian Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2

Ben

Any update on connecting to IBM Univers database from
Macromedia, has
this been confirmed as a bug ?  or have they come up with any
solution
why it does not work with MX but does with 4.5 ?

If it is a bug it would be good if it could be resolved!
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2 - UPDATE

2004-02-27 Thread Ian Vaughan
Hi Ben

 
Any more news on this problem ?? any workarounds available ? 

 
Ian

	-Original Message-
	From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: 24 February 2004 12:54
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	
	No, but I'll check.
	
	
	--- Ben
	
	  _  
	
	From: Ian Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:55 AM
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	Ben
	
	Any update on connecting to IBM Univers database from
Macromedia, has
	this been confirmed as a bug ?  or have they come up with any
solution
	why it does not work with MX but does with 4.5 ?
	
	If it is a bug it would be good if it could be resolved!
	
	-Original Message-
	From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: 23 February 2004 18:56
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	>> But, more than likely this issues that bug me and my clients
	are minor
	>> enough and affect only a few people I can understand how they
	be
	temporarily ignored.  
	
	Nothing is final. But you hit the nail on the head, every piece
	of software
	in existence (including the CF apps that us CF developers write)
	could be
	updated and patched and improved. Some updates are vital, some
	are
	insignificant, and the vast majority sit somewhere between those
	two
	extremes. And so judgment calls have to be made, recognizing
	that while
	updates are important, they have a tremendous cost and impact on
	core
	product delivery. And too many incremental updates are
	disruptive (look at
	Microsoft, and how often that annoying automatic update utility
	kicks in).
	It's about balance.
	
	As I already said, critical issues (for example, security holes,
	or anything
	that could crash a server) take top priority, beyond that it's a
	judgment
	call. We have releases a few hot fixes, they may be more, we'll
	work it out
	as is needed. For now, keep us informed of any and all issues,
	we'll try to
	maintain the right balance.
	
	--- Ben
	
	  _  
	
	From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 1:45 PM
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	No planned maintenance release anytime soon?
	
	Sigh, that is too bad, I was hoping some of the minor "issues"
	would be
	addressed in CFMX 6.1 soon.  But, more than likely this issues
	that bug
	me and my clients are minor enough and affect only a few people
	I can
	understand how they be temporarily ignored.  
	
	Has black stone entered Beta testing yet?  I should maybe get in
	that
	program and see if I can get some of these issues addressed, if
	they
	have not been yet.
	
	Mark W. Breneman
	-Cold Fusion Developer
	-Network Administrator
	  Vivid Media
	  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
	  www.vividmedia.com
	  608.270.9770
	
	-Original Message-
	From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:57 AM
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	Right now we are aggressively working on Blackstone. That is not
	to say
	that
	there'll not be a release between now and then, but I am unaware
	of any
	planned maintenance release at this point. If one becomes
	critical and
	necessary, then I am sure that one will be released (if hot
	fixes are
	not an
	option).
	
	--- Ben
	
	  _  
	
	From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 12:50 PM
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	Ben
	
	Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't there still bugs and known
	issues
	with 6.1. Are you suggesting that there are no immediate plans
	to
	address these?
	
	Thanks
	
	Kola
	
	-Original Message-
	From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: 23 February 2004 16:29
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	CFMX 6.2? I don't believe that version numbers and editions have
	been
	discussed at all, actually.
	
	Generally, maintenance releases have been free upgrades (as 6.1
	was)
	whereas
	full product releases have been paid upgrades (and included in
	subscriptions, of course).
	
	The next planned version of ColdFusion is codenamed
	"Blackstone", and
	version numbers, pricing, etc., have yet to be discussed at all.
	
	But, and this is my own opinion here, I doubt that there will be
	another
	maintenance release for CFMX any time soon. CFMX needed updates,
	which
	is
	why we released service packs and then v6.1, But 6.1 has proven
	to be
	reliable and solid and arguably one of the best ColdFusion's
	ever, and
	so a
	maintenance release is unlikely.
	
	Bottom line, use 6.1 now, and stay tuned for announcements from
	MM.
	
	--- Ben
	
	  _  
	
	From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:16 AM
	To: CF-Talk
	Subject: RE: Question regarding CFMX 6.2
	
	I am wondering, will CF 6.2 be a free upgrade from 6.1 or will
	MM want
	us to
	pay for it? And if $$$ is involved, how much?
	
	TK
	  -Original Message-
	  From: Thomas Chiverton
	[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]