RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread John Beynon
You'll find that most people will use application.cfm to catch direct access
to files other than index.cfm and redirect them to index.cfm in that event.

You can still can use cfapplication in the fbx_settings file though...

Jb.

-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 December 2003 15:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Application.cfm and Fusebox

Hello All,

I have a question that hopefully someone can point me in the right
direction.I have read that the use of application.cfm is not needed any
more with fusebox and that all my information should be in a
fbx_settings.cfm.Firstly I was wondering if this is correct not to use
application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the cf_application
tag?

Mike
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Mickael
Thanks John,

This was initiated by me trying to securing certain circuits and access to them, I have not been able to successfully secure only one circuit only the whole app.Can you point me in the right direction on that?

Thanks again
- Original Message - 
From: John Beynon 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

You'll find that most people will use application.cfm to catch direct access
to files other than index.cfm and redirect them to index.cfm in that event.

You can still can use cfapplication in the fbx_settings file though...

Jb.

-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 December 2003 15:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Application.cfm and Fusebox

Hello All,

I have a question that hopefully someone can point me in the right
direction.I have read that the use of application.cfm is not needed any
more with fusebox and that all my information should be in a
fbx_settings.cfm.Firstly I was wondering if this is correct not to use
application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the cf_application
tag?

Mike
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread John Beynon
If you need to secure individual circuits you'll need to place some
authorisation code in the individual circuits fbx_settings.cfm.

Most of my apps have a single line application.cfm in the app root which
checks that the file being called is index.cfm and then in child circuits I
secure each circuit (within fbx_settings.cfm) using a bespoke
user/group/user2group model. There are basic 'secure' tags out there that
can help you, cf_secure from www.halhelms.com is a good start,

Jb.

-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 December 2003 16:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Application.cfm and Fusebox

Thanks John,

This was initiated by me trying to securing certain circuits and access to
them, I have not been able to successfully secure only one circuit only the
whole app.Can you point me in the right direction on that?

Thanks again
- Original Message - 
From: John Beynon 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

You'll find that most people will use application.cfm to catch direct
access
to files other than index.cfm and redirect them to index.cfm in that
event.

You can still can use cfapplication in the fbx_settings file though...

Jb.

-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 December 2003 15:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Application.cfm and Fusebox

Hello All,

I have a question that hopefully someone can point me in the right
direction.I have read that the use of application.cfm is not needed any
more with fusebox and that all my information should be in a
fbx_settings.cfm.Firstly I was wondering if this is correct not to use
application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the
cf_application
tag?

Mike
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Smith, Matthew P -CONT(CSC)
Either place your security invocation only in the fbx_settings of the circuit(s) you want to protect, or place conditional logic in the root fbx_settings looking at the fusebox.circuit variable, invoking if the final target circuit is one you want to protect.

 
Matthew P. Smith 
Web Developer, Object Oriented 
Naval Education  Training Professional 
Development  Technology Center 
(NETPDTC) 
(850)452-1001 ext. 1245 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 
-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Application.cfm and Fusebox

 
Thanks John,

This was initiated by me trying to securing certain circuits and access to them, I have not been able to successfully secure only one circuit only the whole app.Can you point me in the right direction on that?

Thanks again
- Original Message - 
From: John Beynon 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

You'll find that most people will use application.cfm to catch direct access
to files other than index.cfm and redirect them to index.cfm in that event.

You can still can use cfapplication in the fbx_settings file though...

Jb.

-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 December 2003 15:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Application.cfm and Fusebox

Hello All,

I have a question that hopefully someone can point me in the right
direction.I have read that the use of application.cfm is not needed any
more with fusebox and that all my information should be in a
fbx_settings.cfm.Firstly I was wondering if this is correct not to use
application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the cf_application
tag?

Mike
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread ksuh
 application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the 
 cf_applicationtag?

It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere.
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Dwayne Cole
 application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the 
 cf_applicationtag?

It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere.


Does CF still look for an application.cfm page to process?
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Tony Weeg
ALWAYS!

...tony

tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337

-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

 application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the 
 cf_applicationtag?

It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in
Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere.


Does CF still look for an application.cfm page to process?
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Tangorre, Michael
Always... all the way up to the root of your drive.

-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

 application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the 
 cf_applicationtag?

It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in
Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere.


Does CF still look for an application.cfm page to process? 
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Charlie Griefer
 From: Dwayne Cole 
 To: CF-Talk 
 
 Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:11 AM
 Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox
 
 application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the 
 cf_applicationtag?

It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere.

Just out of curiousity...when/where/why would one use a cfapplication tag anyplace other than in an Application.cfm template?
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread ksuh
In Fusebox 3, the cfapplication tag is normally placed in the fbx_settings file.

- Original Message -
From: Charlie Griefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, December 1, 2003 10:24 am
Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

  From: Dwayne Cole 
  To: CF-Talk 
  
  Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:11 AM
  Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox
  
  application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the 
  cf_applicationtag?
 
 It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only 
 works in Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere.
 
 
 Just out of curiousity...when/where/why would one use a 
 cfapplication tag anyplace other than in an Application.cfm template?
 
 
 

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]