Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Picky picky... The point was that IIS doesn't process the file - CF does. - Original Message - From: "Mike Sheldon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 5:53 PM Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? Actually, IIS does NOT "shove the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen" IIS never touches .cfm files unless it's mis-configured, or has been told to check for the file's existence before handing the request off. (Even then it does not actually open the file, it just looks for it.). Why do you think CF has its own 404 error pages? When IIS gets a request for a file ending in .cfm, it passes the *request* to CF. CF opens the file all by it's lonesome. You can prove this by running CF under a user account and giving CF permission tot he files, but not IIS. (or the other way around if you like errors) Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -Original Message- From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 14:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cf-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? Mike Amburn Application Development --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: 994194320@29032000-1c68 R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA ACH5BAEALACHACwA QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPA
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. That's not exactly how Win2K's EFS works. It's built into NTFS, essentially, so that if you're the user who encrypted the file in the first place, when you request the file, it will automatically be decrypted for you. This applies whether you're an interactive user, or a user account used by a service. To use EFS with a service, you simply have to run the service as a specific user, instead of the local system context. For services that provide impersonation, like IIS, the user of the service will have to be the one who encrypted the file in the first place. The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. That's right. EFS is not intended for use in this context. It's designed mostly for mobile users, who might have critical files on their laptop. Without EFS, once your laptop is stolen, the bad guy could install another copy of NT or Win2K on it, then use administrative rights to take control of the files. With EFS, the bad guy would either need to know the original user's account and password, or the specific admin account reserved for data retrieval, which in a Win2K domain environment would be a domain account. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless you specify that you want them to run under a different one. Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to have the CF service "impersonate" another user to read those files. Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I would think that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by the file owner (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run under the context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as that user. thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: SNIP ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer
The system account does NOT have permissions accross the network. In fact, the system account is pretty restricted in what it can do for security reasons. The system account cannot access ANY user's accounts. Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -Original Message- From: Pecora, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 12:48 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer So here is a question: CF is running under a service account - that has permissions across teh network. If the file in Question is encrypted under the Admin account - won't the system have access to it then??? -Original Message- From: Eddie Shipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? - answer But you can cause your service to run under a spceific security context. Basically, all services run using a service account unless you specify that you want them to run under a different one. Check with your NT Administrator on that one...You should be able to have the CF service "impersonate" another user to read those files. Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I would think that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by the file owner (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run under the context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as that user. thank you, someone that actually has constructive input to offer... you are correct. after i RTF-Win2000-M, i found the following: SNIP ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cf-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? Mike Amburn Application Development --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: 994194320@29032000-1c68 R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA ACH5BAEALACHACwA QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPAGX2IEsozBYkjTiJ1oLeqQjeYYAMNKeSrb74wwIDBBxKYkMACxp3BjkB0aHGG AHMkAsAS0kBjJzdvpGHIG30MEs41AByyxzdgfMMHAIawAkYhnXxzDSgrg7FNOIWA8gkYVzbZhxiD pEHNFlnENy+GVVwDhjZ1FFOMLrukk84aruQyTiez/Sz1qllQQ4c4VshBkH4ONbMKOrwQ48TU+3VS LSm8dKOgQ4ScA/Yu4EhTzRTyAjMMG4Ac9E0v6Jz/c4h5DE1jRhlku/eFJcS0gcxMeDBipSfo9NJL OjDyogwvkaDzxhvFQKJWqABcww2MeuBhii0DNROKKcMQ881ZhxgjSRuQQKKKIIG00QYzyezyy0Bp KNPGMMLY2EsebuRhiRoCcYIJMszUJFAnfUSShyucrFpFIjGasgpPdymzhmkDrWIK7dIT9A2dptwC gDe89GKKHbWUEoseSmVjSS+88DJLJcoYRiCU8BKE8AESwpDEHQBghWW0oRSzIAguehGJUuzhLOcj BiGqIIo8EAMQb5gXF/qwjEw8QhilYEOnMMELZOAhFqmogzTgZIte0M5OBunE+TLxCmTcZg4CMcAf /2TSQ2RgojVLyUNmmpSQOQwvEouAwmsy8QdbhAIWqpkE+QQyi1K0AQ+d8AYgTCGJRoQwQ2noHy+C gRAgDIEUpohck2rBCwGCziCLgIUwlGGJLxCEC4K6hIcQAAAjCIEIQmBCAEqhDqEEYhiQzEQbiBGI UBBiIE5QBSTQwTEATAITiQpFJ3cjyUUJpBvoyIQyENHJwgEAAiRQgQeI8B4dSCcCDWCAK3cJEQpo QAQiGEEIZNADDuggCMhMpg52UIMayGAGOaCBDVxgggY8yyEFcAY1yDCNZzTjDUsAFzW0lAQ6hPNc 0hjEGc8gKzrYaRrUANcZqGGIM0jvDHB4yTSuIf+rgVihDgDYAz8LmIV1TKUovNTIMxKRoCloAyxn sMIYziCNOdhJolZQGB2ogYY4TMEaBbACGphAhTOkwUF1sKjVqiGHek4DDWg4gzWYAI2BEE0adYip Fpwxh2fQbQwGTahQh0rU9kwjC0jAD+CKylSQVGMM4rCEKchxjnNAUhjCABsmYDEhUoRCa00N60GW YIhgHcIQ1ChgQzbxCWNgLh1iEGtTpfGMOQhgG0qiCyvCNja5OoQa1agGuyKChj10Iq4CWQcB5CCN bHhiDxc0SAGqcYbAQiRyU/BrQ8KBClNEAhOigMg1ygGLXmBiHAYJBSbyMAywDiQb6IAkKl7HEPv/ oCERQNLsQr6RuZUYQxkBGMggGIGKCWGCFKXABCpkwYg3EGJ4KjmjQKzRC+HhYQ1RE8gvOqSMPggk
RE: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Actually, IIS does NOT "shove the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen" IIS never touches .cfm files unless it's mis-configured, or has been told to check for the file's existence before handing the request off. (Even then it does not actually open the file, it just looks for it.). Why do you think CF has its own 404 error pages? When IIS gets a request for a file ending in .cfm, it passes the *request* to CF. CF opens the file all by it's lonesome. You can prove this by running CF under a user account and giving CF permission tot he files, but not IIS. (or the other way around if you like errors) Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -Original Message- From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 14:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? It's not CF that doesn't support on the-fly-decrypting, it's the web server. IIS just shoves the .cfm file to the CF parser sight unseen. Of course CF chokes on the encrypted file - it look like garbage to the CF server. Same with ASP, Perl, Tango, what have you. MS would need to build support for on-the-fly decryption into IIS. I hope they don't, as it would incur far too much overhead. What seems to be transparent to you when using MSWord or something becomes a huge issue when multiplied by thousands of page hits. The real issue here is why would you want to use that form of encryption anyway? With the proper permissions set on NT, your code is safe. - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cf-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? Mike Amburn Application Development --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: 994194320@29032000-1c68 R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA ACH5BAEALACHACwA QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPAGX2IEsozBYkjTiJ1oLeqQjeYYAMNKeSrb74wwIDBBxKYkMACxp3BjkB0aHGG AHMkAsAS0kBjJzdvpGHIG30MEs41AByyxzdgfMMHAIawAkYhnXxzDSgrg7FNOIWA8gkYVzbZhxiD pEHNFlnENy+GVVwDhjZ1FFOMLrukk84aruQyTiez/Sz1qllQQ4c4VshBkH4ONbMKOrwQ48TU+3VS LSm8dKOgQ4ScA/Yu4EhTzRTyAjMMG4Ac9E0v6Jz/c4h5DE1jRhlku/eFJcS0gcxMeDBipSfo9NJL OjDyogwvkaDzxhvFQKJWqABcww2MeuBhii0DNROKKcMQ881ZhxgjSRuQQKKKIIG00QYzyezyy0Bp KNPGMMLY2EsebuRhiRoCcYIJMszUJFAnfUSShyucrFpFIjGasg
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect CF, Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you think it needs a fix from Allaire? Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Mike, I wouldn't expect it to be dealt with. That's a feature of Win2K to help protect your files in an internal, corporate environment. MS would have to allow 3rd party vendors access to their unecryption algorithms in order to do this. This would essentially negate any security that encryption might offer you. As a side note, the admins of CF-Talk list have disabled file attachment capabilities because of a virus scare so any messages w/ attached files are coming out screwy. Would you mind removing your atworklogo_very_small.gif Glacier Bkgrd.jpg files from your messages. Thanks, Rey... Certified Allaire Instructor Member of Team Allaire "A browser's beauty, at its heart, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*." - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cf-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? Mike Amburn Application Development --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: image/gif; name="atworklogo_very_small.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: 994194320@29032000-1c68 R0lGODlhhwAsAPcAAMDAwHNzc4SEhKWlpa2trdbW1ufn5+/v77Wtpf/nvffWnP/vzv/nte/WpXtr Sv/WhPfv3vfWjO/OhPfGWvfGUvfOa++9OffWc+fGY+/GUue9Svfv1v/nnP/nlN7Gc97Ga+/GKffG GOe1CPfGCP/GAJSMa+fWjFpSMf/WMee9GOe9APfGAN7Wrf/nc97GUv/eQufGKf/3xv/nUu/WSt7G Of/ve9bGSu/npefWQt7OOf/3nP/3jP/3e//3Y6WlnM7Ovf//zv//xu/vra2te///td7elPf/vd7n pdbn1qW9tWN7c87W1rW9vUpSUnuMjDFCQuf3/6W1vYyltb3Gzpylrd7v/4SMlGNrc0pSWtbe55Sc pVJaY9bn/zFCWhAhOb3O56W1zmNzjL3G1pyltXuElFpjczlCUsbO3qWtvYSMnJytzjlKaxAhQhgx YwgYOdbe787W57W9zq21xoyUpXN7jGtzhHOErWNznBApawgYQgghY73G3nuEnFpje5Sl1jlKezFC cxgpWhAhUsbO56WtxpSctYyUrWNrhFJac0pSa2t7rWNzpSkxSkpajFJjnCk5axAhWggYSgAQQpyl xoyc1oSUzjlCYzFChBghQhgpawAQStbe/7W93q211r3G73N7nGNrjFJae1pjjHOEzjE5WikxUiEp Sik5exAYORAhawgYWoyUvWtznEpSe0JKcyExexAYQhgpewgQOcbO/62156Wt3pSczoSMvXuEtWNr nDlCezE5ayEpWhghUrW994yUzoSMxkpSjCkxayEpYxAYUkJKjCkxcykxhCEpcyEpexAYWhAYYwgQ Wufn787O1rW1vaWlrZycpdbW597e78bG1r29zpycrdbW72tre97e/4yMpb293lJSY7W13sbG94SE pb2973t7nGtrjISEtSEhMTExSmNjpSEhQjExYzExawgIIca9xmtja/fn7wAA ACH5BAEALACHACwA QAj/AAEIHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiwocOHECNKLHigWho02yYqvDaslxaNIEO+OWXMi6kkY9oYCwSoChSC tgJlWjamILheMxFVEWin1zA8vCC1eZRFYCGhmA4BsMPMmKBHhgYRLBBtDaY2gsIIFCCoVxdpBBcJ aiPMG4BBXjJl+ghACjNkqAq1C6nQTiRjy0qFqtMnVJ8+ZUKRSnXMFCiBtQQtw0MF4RxNxpAdcxOK oBQ3bTLFitUl20Bs6kixa0KIS0FPgIY9yhPmJRlVeLpsAhBOVi9BtQiCK5UJjyGBZCQN4+WHLsgD KlbAsMDBiEQgQHRwaFEhQwYDCw1MmXaGyZmEU5ox/0TyA3vCAg7FxDHOvr17hQecERiw7oBCJAbm vt/fEMqeOdgkws0VZFAhxxnTAGAfANPAEccY34SCSiTDGAMMfxgWxIkuyhijVhtRDATFGLZMMskq haA4iRSTVHEIMcMo00hB2xgjDB6CLFKQL714aEYnBNGyiiKiNJKLId14BgAddAg0hSGrmGgiIZ1I VRCUwCxRUCeTkCEFEhk2EskpmdgBABRo5oJMMpAUI9AGEBRiSiCBWGPQNFYJ84gvjQTSCyOmkQEJ HplQMsoy6ESCBgCtmJLJMGYpROYwbqYB2zC5gGLOH2xEEskTjQEADjqQBNLIbYEokqFAaDSBSCiJ fP93kAw4lHBCGYlsoZ5ffYSIkBh9JIIIWwRdww43JzjQwA0sCAGBiGKE04clpZRiSR/hUGPQAK0g UkeCAlFzSCgDOgPAGX2IEsozBYkjTiJ1oLeqQjeYYAMNKeSrb74wwIDBBxKYkMACxp3BjkB0aHGG AHMkAsAS0kBjJzdvpGHIG30MEs41AByyxzdgfMMHAIawAkYhnXxzDSgrg7FNOIWA8gkYVzbZhxiD pEHNFlnENy+GVVwDhjZ1FFOMLrukk84aruQyTiez/Sz1qllQQ4c4VshBkH4ONbMKOrwQ48TU+3VS LSm8dKOgQ4ScA/Yu4EhTzRTyAjMMG4Ac9E0v6Jz/c4h5DE1jRhlku/eFJcS0gcxMeDBipSfo9NJL OjDyogwvkaDzxhvFQKJWqABcww2MeuBhii0DNROKKcMQ881ZhxgjSRuQQKKKIIG00QYzyezyy0Bp KNPGMMLY2EsebuRhiRoCcYIJMszUJFAnfUSShyucrFpFIjGasgpPdymzhmkDrWIK7dIT9A2dptwC gDe89GKKHbWUEoseSmVjSS+88DJLJcoYRiCU8BKE8AESwpDEHQBghWW0oRSzIAguehGJUuzhLOcj BiGqIIo8EAMQb5gXF/qwjEw8QhilYEOnMMELZOAhFqmogzTgZIte0M5OBunE+TLxCmTcZg4CMcAf /2TSQ2RgojVLyUNmmpSQOQwvEouAwmsy8QdbhAIWqpkE+QQyi1K0AQ+d8AYgTCGJRoQwQ2noHy+C gRAgDIEUpohck2rBCwGCziCLgIUwlGGJLxCEC4K6hIcQAAAjCIEIQmBCAEqhDqEEYhiQzEQbiBGI UBBiIE5QBSTQwTEATAITiQpFJ3cjyUUJpBvoyIQyENHJwgEAAiRQgQeI8B4dSCcCDWCAK3cJEQpo QAQiGEEIZNADDuggCMhMpg52UIMayGAGOaCBDVxgggY8yyEFcAY1yDCNZzTjDUsAFzW0lAQ6hPNc 0hjEGc8gKzrYaRrUANcZqGGIM0jvDHB4yTSuIf+rgVihDgDYAz8LmIV1TKUovNTIMxKRoCloAyxn sMIYziCNOdhJolZQGB2ogYY4TMEaBbACGphAhTOkwUF1sKjVqiGHek4DDWg4gzWYAI2BEE0adYip Fpwxh2fQbQwGTahQh0rU9kwjC0jAD+CKylSQVGMM4rCEKchxjnNAUhjCABsmYDEhUoRCa00N60GW YIhgHcIQ1ChgQzbxCWNgLh1iEGtTpfGMOQhgG0qiCyvCNja5OoQa1agGuyKChj10Iq4CWQcB5CCN bHhiDxc0SAGqcYbAQiRyU/BrQ8KBClNEAhOigMg1ygGLXmBiHAYJBSbyMAywDiQb6IAkKl7HEPv/
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
maybe you shouldn't let MS encrypt the pages and just let CF do the work like its supposed to if something is going to go through two encryption/decryption processes from two different servers what is going to define which goes first common sense - Original Message - From: "Michael Dinowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:33 PM Subject: Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? Forgive me for asking, but if MS gives a new 'feature' that will effect CF, Perl, Rebol and almost every non-MS scripting language, why would you think it needs a fix from Allaire? Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
Re: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption?
Mike - Just a guess here as I haven't tried EFS on a server yet, but I would think that since files are encrypted by and can only be read by the file owner (as I understand it) that the CF Server service would need to run under the context of the file owner - ie have the CF service login as that user. Jay At 04:27 PM 3/29/2000 -0500, you wrote: Mike, I wouldn't expect it to be dealt with. That's a feature of Win2K to help protect your files in an internal, corporate environment. MS would have to allow 3rd party vendors access to their unecryption algorithms in order to do this. This would essentially negate any security that encryption might offer you. As a side note, the admins of CF-Talk list have disabled file attachment capabilities because of a virus scare so any messages w/ attached files are coming out screwy. Would you mind removing your atworklogo_very_small.gif Glacier Bkgrd.jpg files from your messages. Thanks, Rey... Certified Allaire Instructor Member of Team Allaire "A browser's beauty, at its heart, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*." - Original Message - From: "Mike Amburn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cf-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:46 PM Subject: CF4.5 doesn't support Win2000 file encryption? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Windows 2000 allows you to encrypt files. ColdFusion does not seem to support this, as I get the following error on any page that I encrypt: The template file exists, however, it either cannot be opened for reading, or it is encrypted and its data has been corrupted as soon as i unencrypt, all things are good to go. anyone heard anything about this? is allaire going to fix this in a service patch? Mike Amburn Application Development --=_NextPart_000__01BF9995.F72A13D0 Content-Type: image/gif; [Ugly GIF garbage removed...] -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
