RE: Hosting lag time

2000-04-13 Thread Steve Pierce

you wrote:
>>  now, if you're talking about collocation of equipment, location
>>  is a HUGE factor when you have to get up at 3 AM to go reboot a server.

Unless of course your hosting company provides you with remote control
reboot capabilities that don't require a tech. Then it is easy to reboot
your servers at 3AM. Still if your host is a 1,000 miles away, it does make
it a bit tougher to change out that defective memory chip. Look for hosting
companies that can also monitor your server and let you know when it there
is a problem and notify you via a pager or email. Some hosting companies can
even automatically reboot your servers for you after some interval you set
like 30 minutes or an hour. And then make sure techs are available late at
night if you need them to install a new drive or memory.

Good luck,

 - Steve

Steve Pierce, HDL
"Co-Location starting $99 per month, no setup fee"
(734) 482-9682| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://HDL.com




-Original Message-
From: Chris Meier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hosting lag time


The location isnt as important as the available bandwidth.  Would you rather
host on "Joe's Bait Shop and Web Hosting", which is next door but only has a
single t-1, or on a company in another state with multiple OC3's?  now, if
you're talking about colocation of equipment, location is a HUGE factor when
you have to get up at 3 AM to go reboot a server.

-Original Message-
From: LetchfordDesign [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hosting lag time


This probably is too basic a question to be asking such a high powered
group,  but here it goes anyway.

I am going to be moving a few web sites from a hosting company that is in
close proximity to my location and the location of the businesses that have
the web sites.

In my search for a new host (which will provide ColdFusion, naturally),  how
significant is the factor of where the servers are physically located?   The
businesses are all locally oriented and most of the site traffic is created
by clients in the local area (east coast in this example).   Is there any
advantage to having the hosting company close by or could a company on the
west coast provide service with little evidence of additional load time for
the sites?

In advance,  thanks for your thoughts!

Gary Letchford
Letchford Design
http://www.letchforddesign.com






--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.


--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.

--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.



RE: Hosting lag time

2000-04-13 Thread Steve Pierce

The big question is hat is their connection to the Internet more than where
they are physically located. You need to find out who is their upstream
provider, what sort of connection do they have. Is it shared, and then you
need to test it.

If you don't have time for that, then find the cheapest guy with the best
support and hope for the best 

 - Steve


-Original Message-
From: LetchfordDesign [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hosting lag time


This probably is too basic a question to be asking such a high powered
group,  but here it goes anyway.

I am going to be moving a few web sites from a hosting company that is in
close proximity to my location and the location of the businesses that have
the web sites.

In my search for a new host (which will provide ColdFusion, naturally),  how
significant is the factor of where the servers are physically located?   The
businesses are all locally oriented and most of the site traffic is created
by clients in the local area (east coast in this example).   Is there any
advantage to having the hosting company close by or could a company on the
west coast provide service with little evidence of additional load time for
the sites?

In advance,  thanks for your thoughts!

Gary Letchford
Letchford Design
http://www.letchforddesign.com






--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.

--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.



RE: Hosting lag time

2000-04-13 Thread Kelly Matthews

I would suggest hosting at a FIRST Teir provider (someone with a direct
connection
to MAEEAST or MAEWEST anyone in the Tysons Herndon Area that connects
straight into MAEEAST is going to be pretty quick and reliable assuming they
have
redundancy built in. CAIS, PSINET, UUNET etc but you will pay more however
you
will have great reliablitly. I have a dedicated server at Digital Nation, a
1st teir dedicated
server provider in Northern VA, NEVER have had a big problem. In the last
year maybe
3 times there was a 10 minute outage and that was it.
Kelly

> -Original Message-
> From: LetchfordDesign [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:19 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Hosting lag time
> 
> This probably is too basic a question to be asking such a high powered
> group,  but here it goes anyway.
> 
> I am going to be moving a few web sites from a hosting company that is in
> close proximity to my location and the location of the businesses that
> have
> the web sites.
> 
> In my search for a new host (which will provide ColdFusion, naturally),
> how
> significant is the factor of where the servers are physically located?
> The
> businesses are all locally oriented and most of the site traffic is
> created
> by clients in the local area (east coast in this example).   Is there any
> advantage to having the hosting company close by or could a company on the
> west coast provide service with little evidence of additional load time
> for
> the sites?
> 
> In advance,  thanks for your thoughts!
> 
> Gary Letchford
> Letchford Design
> http://www.letchforddesign.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
> send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
> the body.
--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.



RE: Hosting lag time

2000-04-13 Thread Chris Meier

The location isnt as important as the available bandwidth.  Would you rather
host on "Joe's Bait Shop and Web Hosting", which is next door but only has a
single t-1, or on a company in another state with multiple OC3's?  now, if
you're talking about colocation of equipment, location is a HUGE factor when
you have to get up at 3 AM to go reboot a server.

-Original Message-
From: LetchfordDesign [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hosting lag time


This probably is too basic a question to be asking such a high powered
group,  but here it goes anyway.

I am going to be moving a few web sites from a hosting company that is in
close proximity to my location and the location of the businesses that have
the web sites.

In my search for a new host (which will provide ColdFusion, naturally),  how
significant is the factor of where the servers are physically located?   The
businesses are all locally oriented and most of the site traffic is created
by clients in the local area (east coast in this example).   Is there any
advantage to having the hosting company close by or could a company on the
west coast provide service with little evidence of additional load time for
the sites?

In advance,  thanks for your thoughts!

Gary Letchford
Letchford Design
http://www.letchforddesign.com






--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.

--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.