RE: MX Mappings
What are the fundamental changes for a CT with MX? (underlying) if any.. Neil -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 July 2002 16:29 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: MX Mappings Well, CFMX does create a class file for each of the CFINCLUDEs that it uses. A lot of includes means a lot of extra compilations. I wonder if that will still be true if the CFINCLUDES were saved as .txt or .inc rather than .cfm. > I don't know that there is anything different in how it uses mappings, but > I've heard complaints from a lot of people about performance problems with > MX when the application is using a lot of cfincluded files. The performance > issue is likely with the cfinclude tag itself, rather than resolving > mappings. > > ~Simon > > Simon Horwith > Macromedia Certified Instructor > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > Fig Leaf Software > 1400 16th St NW, # 500 > Washington DC 20036 > 202.797.6570 (direct line) > www.figleaf.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 07:35 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: MX Mappings > > > Is there a significant difference in which MX uses mappings (or > includes)? I am using a script which works AOK in CF5, but fails within > MX stating it cannot find the template etc... > > It is being called from a Custom Tag thus : > > > > #loginpath# is set within Application.cfm. > > As I said, works fine in CF5, but not in MX... > > probably been looking at it too long... > > Neil > > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: MX Mappings
Well, CFMX does create a class file for each of the CFINCLUDEs that it uses. A lot of includes means a lot of extra compilations. I wonder if that will still be true if the CFINCLUDES were saved as .txt or .inc rather than .cfm. > I don't know that there is anything different in how it uses mappings, but > I've heard complaints from a lot of people about performance problems with > MX when the application is using a lot of cfincluded files. The performance > issue is likely with the cfinclude tag itself, rather than resolving > mappings. > > ~Simon > > Simon Horwith > Macromedia Certified Instructor > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > Fig Leaf Software > 1400 16th St NW, # 500 > Washington DC 20036 > 202.797.6570 (direct line) > www.figleaf.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 07:35 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: MX Mappings > > > Is there a significant difference in which MX uses mappings (or > includes)? I am using a script which works AOK in CF5, but fails within > MX stating it cannot find the template etc... > > It is being called from a Custom Tag thus : > > > > #loginpath# is set within Application.cfm. > > As I said, works fine in CF5, but not in MX... > > probably been looking at it too long... > > Neil > > > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: MX Mappings
I don't know that there is anything different in how it uses mappings, but I've heard complaints from a lot of people about performance problems with MX when the application is using a lot of cfincluded files. The performance issue is likely with the cfinclude tag itself, rather than resolving mappings. ~Simon Simon Horwith Macromedia Certified Instructor Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer Fig Leaf Software 1400 16th St NW, # 500 Washington DC 20036 202.797.6570 (direct line) www.figleaf.com -Original Message- From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 07:35 To: CF-Talk Subject: MX Mappings Is there a significant difference in which MX uses mappings (or includes)? I am using a script which works AOK in CF5, but fails within MX stating it cannot find the template etc... It is being called from a Custom Tag thus : #loginpath# is set within Application.cfm. As I said, works fine in CF5, but not in MX... probably been looking at it too long... Neil __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: MX Mappings
Ah, sorry, I meant to say that the variable is set within the app_globals.cfm file which is included at the to of the Index.cfm file (Fusebox). The scripts work fine n dandy with CF5, the problem is only when you port to CFMX; even though all the CFAS settings are the same etc... The error is stating : cannot find the template, yet it displays the correct path to the template! Its weird, but to be honest with you, I am not bothered about it on MX at the mo as I am more than likey gonna re-engineer it for MX when necessary using CFC's - Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 July 2002 15:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: MX Mappings Neil, this is interesting... as I thought that the application.cfm is not called when customtags are used and unless the parameter is eiter passed into the customtag or the variable is in the request.scope you might have trouble reading it. But then you might asked, why did it work in CF 5? h puzzled look...:-)) I am sure there must be a explanation that actually makes sense...Good luck. -- Birgit -- Sunday, July 7, 2002, 7:58:02 AM, you wrote: NCT> I think I have sorted it, it appears to be a problem with the actual NCT> CT... I have removed the dynamic call and it seems to work :-p NCT> I will have to re-engineer it for MX at some point! NCT> Neil NCT> -Original Message- NCT> From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] NCT> Sent: 07 July 2002 12:35 NCT> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' NCT> Subject: MX Mappings NCT> Is there a significant difference in which MX uses mappings (or NCT> includes)? I am using a script which works AOK in CF5, but fails within NCT> MX stating it cannot find the template etc... NCT> It is being called from a Custom Tag thus : NCT> NCT> #loginpath# is set within Application.cfm. NCT> As I said, works fine in CF5, but not in MX... NCT> probably been looking at it too long... NCT> Neil NCT> __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: MX Mappings
Neil, this is interesting... as I thought that the application.cfm is not called when customtags are used and unless the parameter is eiter passed into the customtag or the variable is in the request.scope you might have trouble reading it. But then you might asked, why did it work in CF 5? h puzzled look...:-)) I am sure there must be a explanation that actually makes sense...Good luck. -- Birgit -- Sunday, July 7, 2002, 7:58:02 AM, you wrote: NCT> I think I have sorted it, it appears to be a problem with the actual NCT> CT... I have removed the dynamic call and it seems to work :-p NCT> I will have to re-engineer it for MX at some point! NCT> Neil NCT> -Original Message- NCT> From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] NCT> Sent: 07 July 2002 12:35 NCT> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' NCT> Subject: MX Mappings NCT> Is there a significant difference in which MX uses mappings (or NCT> includes)? I am using a script which works AOK in CF5, but fails within NCT> MX stating it cannot find the template etc... NCT> It is being called from a Custom Tag thus : NCT> NCT> #loginpath# is set within Application.cfm. NCT> As I said, works fine in CF5, but not in MX... NCT> probably been looking at it too long... NCT> Neil NCT> __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: MX Mappings
I think I have sorted it, it appears to be a problem with the actual CT... I have removed the dynamic call and it seems to work :-p I will have to re-engineer it for MX at some point! Neil -Original Message- From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 July 2002 12:35 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: MX Mappings Is there a significant difference in which MX uses mappings (or includes)? I am using a script which works AOK in CF5, but fails within MX stating it cannot find the template etc... It is being called from a Custom Tag thus : #loginpath# is set within Application.cfm. As I said, works fine in CF5, but not in MX... probably been looking at it too long... Neil __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
