RE: Win 2003 SBS
Dan what is considered "Loaded with RAM" in the context of a server with Win, CF and SQL? Mark W. Breneman -Cold Fusion Developer -Network Administrator Vivid Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vividmedia.com 608.270.9770 -Original Message- From: Dan Phillips (CFXHosting.com) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:58 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win 2003 SBS We have a few clients running dedicated servers with this setup. No problems to report so far (that they have made me aware of anyway). Careful running Win, CF, and SQL on the same box though. Load it up with RAM and keep an eye on traffic. Dan Phillips www.CFXHosting.com 1-866-239-4678 x105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Pratte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:46 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Win 2003 SBS I am buying a new box to use as a Cold Fusion server. I was thinking about buying the Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2003 premium edition ($1499), since it comes with Win 2003, and SQL Server. Does anyone have experience with this? Is it a good choice? Thanks, jeff _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Win 2003 SBS
> Dave do you have any docs on something like that? I was > discussing it the other day with someone and they requested > some documentation so that they can show their boss. The > guy wants to go to a separate SQL server but the boss > won't let him until the cost is justified. I don't really have any formal documentation handy for this, but you can pick up any book on web application security and it'll be in there somewhere. As for whether the cost is justified, it's often hard to perform cost-benefit analysis until it's too late. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Win 2003 SBS
yeah coupled apps/os's are a bit scary ...tony tony weeg senior web applications architect navtrak, inc. www.navtrak.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] 410.548.2337 -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF-Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:05 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Win 2003 SBS I haven't heard anything bad about Win 2003 SBS, in fact I've heard a lot of good things. If you are going to use it for in-house development I would think It's a deal, but I wouldn't publicly host on a machine that is also housing my SQL server for security purposes. Just my $.02 Cutter Jeffrey Pratte wrote: > I am buying a new box to use as a Cold Fusion server. I was thinking > about buying the Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2003 premium > edition ($1499), since it comes with Win 2003, and SQL Server. Does > anyone have experience with this? Is it a good choice? > > Thanks, jeff > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Win 2003 SBS
Dave do you have any docs on something like that? I was discussing it the other day with someone and they requested some documentation so that they can show their boss. The guy wants to go to a separate SQL server but the boss won't let him until the cost is justified. -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Win 2003 SBS > I am buying a new box to use as a Cold Fusion server. I was > thinking about buying the Microsoft Windows Small Business > Server 2003 premium edition ($1499), since it comes with Win > 2003, and SQL Server. Does anyone have experience with this? > Is it a good choice? This might be ok for internal sites at relatively small locations, but I really wouldn't recommend it for publicly accessible sites, due to the performance and security ramifications of having your database server and your web/application server on the same machine. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
Re: Win 2003 SBS
I haven't heard anything bad about Win 2003 SBS, in fact I've heard a lot of good things. If you are going to use it for in-house development I would think It's a deal, but I wouldn't publicly host on a machine that is also housing my SQL server for security purposes. Just my $.02 Cutter Jeffrey Pratte wrote: > I am buying a new box to use as a Cold Fusion server. I was thinking > about buying the Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2003 premium > edition ($1499), since it comes with Win 2003, and SQL Server. Does > anyone have experience with this? Is it a good choice? > > Thanks, jeff > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Win 2003 SBS
> I am buying a new box to use as a Cold Fusion server. I was > thinking about buying the Microsoft Windows Small Business > Server 2003 premium edition ($1499), since it comes with Win > 2003, and SQL Server. Does anyone have experience with this? > Is it a good choice? This might be ok for internal sites at relatively small locations, but I really wouldn't recommend it for publicly accessible sites, due to the performance and security ramifications of having your database server and your web/application server on the same machine. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: Win 2003 SBS
We have a few clients running dedicated servers with this setup. No problems to report so far (that they have made me aware of anyway). Careful running Win, CF, and SQL on the same box though. Load it up with RAM and keep an eye on traffic. Dan Phillips www.CFXHosting.com 1-866-239-4678 x105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Pratte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:46 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Win 2003 SBS I am buying a new box to use as a Cold Fusion server. I was thinking about buying the Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2003 premium edition ($1499), since it comes with Win 2003, and SQL Server. Does anyone have experience with this? Is it a good choice? Thanks, jeff [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
