RE: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread John Beynon
I think this is the URL you are referring to:

http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/cf_aspnet.html

jb

-Original Message-
From: Pete Ruckelshaus - CFList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 May 2004 19:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: price of aspx vs cfm

Ben Forta did a great article on this a while back.I Hopefully he'll 
chime in with a URL.

 From my perspective, there are 2 major areas where CF saves money. 
First, development time.CF development is, IME, faster; less 
development time = saved money.Second, what you don't have to buy.My 
ASP experience goes back to ASP 3.0, so things might have changed with 
.net, but with ASP, if you wanted to do file uploads, or send emails, or 
do any of that special stuff, you had to go find a third-party 
solution which would usually cost $$$.

So, take the argument from this perspective.Come up with an 
application that involves database access, file uploading, writing your 
own logs, robust error handling, and sending emails.Agree on the 
requirements, then have 2 developers of roughly equal skill levels 
develop the app in both CF and ASP.See who's headed for happy hour and 
who's headed for the bottle of excedrin.

Pete

John Ho wrote:
 hi guy
 
 Can someone give me advantage/disadv in asp.net and
 coldfusionmx?.
 asp.net is free? or how much?. I current have
 coldfusionmx and try to convince some of my coworkers
 to use coldfusion
 
 thanks
 John
 
 
 	
 		
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover 
 

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread Jeremy Brodie
Think of ASP.net as a whole different language and paradigm than straight ASP. In fact, as a framwork, ASP.net looks and feels quite a bit like Flex. Good ASP programming with use a combination of code-behinds in vb script, C# classes that are inheareted into the ASP.net page and stored proceedures for accessing data, and custom componet tags.

With that out of the way here are some of the more compelling reasons to use CF.

1) Cold Fusion is not tied down to the Windows platform. ASP.net is definatly tied to the whims of microsoft. In fact you can run Cold Fusion in a Linux/Apache/Tomcat environment. The last time I checked, these systems were free.

Windows as the operating system can cost anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars depending on the version selected. Linux/Apache/Tomcat can be downloaded for free.

In fact, if cost were the only issue, take a look at Jarkarta Struts -- a Java framework containing many of the same features as ASP.net. Since your team is not considering Struts --this tells me that cost is not the only issue here, rather your team wants to use the Microsoft platform.

2) ASP.net is tied to the current version of the IIS webserver. I do not believe you can use the Apache webserver with ASP.net. In fact Microsoft considers IIS an application server for ASP.net. 

hi guy

Can someone give me advantage/disadv in asp.net and
coldfusionmx?.
asp.net is free? or how much?. I current have
coldfusionmx and try to convince some of my coworkers
to use coldfusion

thanks
John


	
		
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread Nathan Strutz
I thin it's this one:

http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/article.cfm?id=541

-nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/

John Beynon wrote:

 I think this is the URL you are referring to:
 
 http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/cf_aspnet.html
 
 jb
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Pete Ruckelshaus - CFList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 04 May 2004 19:44
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: price of aspx vs cfm
 
 Ben Forta did a great article on this a while back.I Hopefully he'll
 chime in with a URL.

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread John Ho
Thank you for the information
Is this true ASP.net can not run in Linux or Unix machine?.
If it is I will have good advantage to win this because there area a lot of computers running Linux and Unix in my area 

 Think of ASP.net as a whole different language and paradigm than 
 straight ASP. In fact, as a framwork, ASP.net looks and feels quite a 
 bit like Flex. Good ASP programming with use a combination of 
 code-behinds in vb script, C# classes that are inheareted into the ASP.
 net page and stored proceedures for accessing data, and custom 
 componet tags.
 
 With that out of the way here are some of the more compelling reasons 
 to use CF.
 
 1) Cold Fusion is not tied down to the Windows platform. ASP.net is 
 definatly tied to the whims of microsoft. In fact you can run Cold 
 Fusion in a Linux/Apache/Tomcat environment. The last time I checked, 
 these systems were free.
 
 Windows as the operating system can cost anywhere from a few hundred 
 to a few thousand dollars depending on the version selected. 
 Linux/Apache/Tomcat can be downloaded for free.
 
 In fact, if cost were the only issue, take a look at Jarkarta Struts 
 -- a Java framework containing many of the same features as ASP.net. 
 Since your team is not considering Struts --this tells me that cost is 
 not the only issue here, rather your team wants to use the Microsoft 
 platform.
 
 2) ASP.net is tied to the current version of the IIS webserver. I do 
 not believe you can use the Apache webserver with ASP.net. In fact 
 Microsoft considers IIS an application server for ASP.net. 
 
 
 
 hi guy
 
 Can someone give me advantage/disadv in asp.net and
 coldfusionmx?.
 asp.net is free? or how much?. I current have
 coldfusionmx and try to convince some of my coworkers
 to use coldfusion
 
 thanks
 John
 
 
 	
 		
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.
com/careermakeover
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread John Beynon
Microsoft haven't produced (YET) and ASP.NET version for Linux. Linux/Unix
computers can access sites written using .aspx files though.

-Original Message-
From: John Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 05 May 2004 16:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: price of aspx vs cfm

Thank you for the information
Is this true ASP.net can not run in Linux or Unix machine?.
If it is I will have good advantage to win this because there area a lot of
computers running Linux and Unix in my area 

 Think of ASP.net as a whole different language and paradigm than 
 straight ASP. In fact, as a framwork, ASP.net looks and feels quite a 
 bit like Flex. Good ASP programming with use a combination of 
 code-behinds in vb script, C# classes that are inheareted into the ASP.
 net page and stored proceedures for accessing data, and custom 
 componet tags.
 
 With that out of the way here are some of the more compelling reasons 
 to use CF.
 
 1) Cold Fusion is not tied down to the Windows platform. ASP.net is 
 definatly tied to the whims of microsoft. In fact you can run Cold 
 Fusion in a Linux/Apache/Tomcat environment. The last time I checked, 
 these systems were free.
 
 Windows as the operating system can cost anywhere from a few hundred 
 to a few thousand dollars depending on the version selected. 
 Linux/Apache/Tomcat can be downloaded for free.
 
 In fact, if cost were the only issue, take a look at Jarkarta Struts 
 -- a Java framework containing many of the same features as ASP.net. 
 Since your team is not considering Struts --this tells me that cost is 
 not the only issue here, rather your team wants to use the Microsoft 
 platform.
 
 2) ASP.net is tied to the current version of the IIS webserver. I do 
 not believe you can use the Apache webserver with ASP.net. In fact 
 Microsoft considers IIS an application server for ASP.net. 
 
 
 
 hi guy
 
 Can someone give me advantage/disadv in asp.net and
 coldfusionmx?.
 asp.net is free? or how much?. I current have
 coldfusionmx and try to convince some of my coworkers
 to use coldfusion
 
 thanks
 John
 
 
 	
 		
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.
com/careermakeover
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread Dave Watts
 Is this true ASP.net can not run in Linux or Unix machine?.
 If it is I will have good advantage to win this because there 
 area a lot of computers running Linux and Unix in my area

Well, not exactly. The Mono project supports ASP.NET
(http://www.go-mono.com/asp-net.html). However, in real life, you aren't
going to run into too many people trying to use ASP.NET on Unix. Most .NET
developers are Windows-centric, and almost all .NET applications are written
specifically for Windows.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-05 Thread Mike Townend
http://tinyurl.com/2ddpx 

http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/05/0443213.shtml?tid=106tid=185tid=190

http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/05/0443213.shtml?tid=106tid=185tid=190
tid=201

Theres a Beta of Mono out that should allow .Net to run on linux

-Original Message-
From: John Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2004 16:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: price of aspx vs cfm

Thank you for the information
Is this true ASP.net can not run in Linux or Unix machine?.
If it is I will have good advantage to win this because there area a lot of
computers running Linux and Unix in my area 

 Think of ASP.net as a whole different language and paradigm than 
 straight ASP. In fact, as a framwork, ASP.net looks and feels quite a 
 bit like Flex. Good ASP programming with use a combination of 
 code-behinds in vb script, C# classes that are inheareted into the ASP.
 net page and stored proceedures for accessing data, and custom 
 componet tags.
 
 With that out of the way here are some of the more compelling reasons 
 to use CF.
 
 1) Cold Fusion is not tied down to the Windows platform. ASP.net is 
 definatly tied to the whims of microsoft. In fact you can run Cold 
 Fusion in a Linux/Apache/Tomcat environment. The last time I checked, 
 these systems were free.
 
 Windows as the operating system can cost anywhere from a few hundred 
 to a few thousand dollars depending on the version selected. 
 Linux/Apache/Tomcat can be downloaded for free.
 
 In fact, if cost were the only issue, take a look at Jarkarta Struts 
 -- a Java framework containing many of the same features as ASP.net. 
 Since your team is not considering Struts --this tells me that cost is 
 not the only issue here, rather your team wants to use the Microsoft 
 platform.
 
 2) ASP.net is tied to the current version of the IIS webserver. I do 
 not believe you can use the Apache webserver with ASP.net. In fact 
 Microsoft considers IIS an application server for ASP.net. 
 
 
 
 hi guy
 
 Can someone give me advantage/disadv in asp.net and
 coldfusionmx?.
 asp.net is free? or how much?. I current have
 coldfusionmx and try to convince some of my coworkers
 to use coldfusion
 
 thanks
 John
 
 
  
  
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.
com/careermakeover 
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: price of aspx vs cfm

2004-05-04 Thread Semrau Steven Ctr SAF/IE
Haha, I was just reading this article again two weeks ago - it's in one of the last 2002 issues of CFDJ - sorry I'm at work so I don't have the exact Vol. and Issue. But if you go to http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/ you should be able to find it. I believe it was the November issue.

-Original Message-
From: Pete Ruckelshaus - CFList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 2:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: price of aspx vs cfm

Ben Forta did a great article on this a while back.I Hopefully he'll 
chime in with a URL.

>From my perspective, there are 2 major areas where CF saves money. 
First, development time.CF development is, IME, faster; less 
development time = saved money.Second, what you don't have to buy.My 
ASP experience goes back to ASP 3.0, so things might have changed with 
.net, but with ASP, if you wanted to do file uploads, or send emails, or 
do any of that special stuff, you had to go find a third-party 
solution which would usually cost $$$.

So, take the argument from this perspective.Come up with an 
application that involves database access, file uploading, writing your 
own logs, robust error handling, and sending emails.Agree on the 
requirements, then have 2 developers of roughly equal skill levels 
develop the app in both CF and ASP.See who's headed for happy hour and 
who's headed for the bottle of excedrin.

Pete

John Ho wrote:
 hi guy
 
 Can someone give me advantage/disadv in asp.net and
 coldfusionmx?.
 asp.net is free? or how much?. I current have
 coldfusionmx and try to convince some of my coworkers
 to use coldfusion
 
 thanks
 John
 
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover 
 
 
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]