Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-07 Thread Mark Henderson
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 What lists are these?

http://webdesign-l.com/  The list owner is Steven Champeon, and let me
give you fair warning - if you wish to join do *NOT* top post on this one!

http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d run by Eric Meyer.

Both are most definitely worth joining.

Mark


~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252329
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-07 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Lol, yeah. Thanks. Will need to ensure Outlook allows this!









This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-Original Message-
From: Mark Henderson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Sep 07 08:22:44 2006
Subject: Re: Replying after the message

Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 What lists are these?

http://webdesign-l.com/  The list owner is Steven Champeon, and let me
give you fair warning - if you wish to join do *NOT* top post on this one!

http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d run by Eric Meyer.

Both are most definitely worth joining.

Mark




~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252331
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-06 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
 I think that in is most cases, I am reading on my Blackberry and for long
posts, you get a scroll for more, and more just to read a reply...

I think it is a preference, got a to love a top v bottom preference!








This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-Original Message-
From: Mark Henderson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Sep 06 05:06:13 2006
Subject: RE: Replying after the message

Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it 
 probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone 
 else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!

Then Dave Watts responded
 No, it's just you.

I totally agree with Dave but that is just my opinion of course. In
fact, if you happen to be on either the WDD design or css-discuss lists
(and those struggling to learn css really should join) you'll get
politely scolded for top posting (and sometimes NOT so politely!).
Trimming of course certainly does help, and often leaving the entire
contents of the previous email intact, whether you bottom or top post,
makes readability difficult. 

Truly though, there really is no right or wrong answer on this one, it's
more a matter of preference. Microsoft's default has definitely made top
posting the *norm* however.

Here is an argument *for* top posting, though as already stated I'm
certainly not an advocate:
http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/03/shooting-yourself-in-the-foot-or-hea
d-one-round-in-the-bottom-vs-top-posting-war/

Mark


-- 

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by ISPNZ's automated virus detection system,
and is believed to be clean.




~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252173
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-06 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
What lists are these?






This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-Original Message-
From: Mark Henderson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Sep 06 05:06:13 2006
Subject: RE: Replying after the message

Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it 
 probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone 
 else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!

Then Dave Watts responded
 No, it's just you.

I totally agree with Dave but that is just my opinion of course. In
fact, if you happen to be on either the WDD design or css-discuss lists
(and those struggling to learn css really should join) you'll get
politely scolded for top posting (and sometimes NOT so politely!).
Trimming of course certainly does help, and often leaving the entire
contents of the previous email intact, whether you bottom or top post,
makes readability difficult. 

Truly though, there really is no right or wrong answer on this one, it's
more a matter of preference. Microsoft's default has definitely made top
posting the *norm* however.

Here is an argument *for* top posting, though as already stated I'm
certainly not an advocate:
http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/03/shooting-yourself-in-the-foot-or-hea
d-one-round-in-the-bottom-vs-top-posting-war/

Mark


-- 

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by ISPNZ's automated virus detection system,
and is believed to be clean.




~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252175
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-06 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
An RFC for posting, lol.

Looks like I will have to scroll for more, and more, and more:-)






This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Sep 06 00:31:29 2006
Subject: RE: Replying after the message

 I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it 
 probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone 
 else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!

No, it's just you.

Here are some relevant links.

The RFC in question (yes, there is one!):
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 - go to page 7

Posting styles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting

What Top-Posting Is (my favorite description):
http://blinkynet.net/comp/toppost.html

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location.
Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!




~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252176
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-06 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 An RFC for posting, lol.
 
 Looks like I will have to scroll for more, and more, and more:-)

That isn't very convincing from somebody with a 15 line signature.

Jochem

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252191
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


RE: Replying after the message

2006-09-06 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
LOL, yeah well corporate rules, and besides the sig is at the end ;-p










-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 September 2006 13:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Replying after the message

Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 An RFC for posting, lol.
 
 Looks like I will have to scroll for more, and more, and more:-)

That isn't very convincing from somebody with a 15 line signature.

Jochem



~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252195
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-06 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 LOL, yeah well corporate rules

That's why I don't post from a corporate address: I think it is unprofessional 
to bombard readers with all that junk. It is a one-time setup issue for me vs. 
a recurring reading experience for everybody on the list.

Jochem

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252201
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


OT: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
damn annoying?!

No fingers at anyone just a gripe.






This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252138
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: OT: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Casey Dougall
I'm still trying to figure out why gmail puts my signiture at the
bottom of the reply even though I'll br posting above it...

On 9/5/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
 sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
 damn annoying?!

 No fingers at anyone just a gripe.

Casey Dougall
Web Applications Developer
Ph: 518 743-9424  Fax: 743-0337
Mannix Marketing Inc. 33 Park St. Third Floor, Glens Falls, New York 12801
~~
wWw.TerrainAssassin.cOm - Nov1 2006

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252141
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


RE: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Dave Watts
 I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it 
 probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone 
 else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!

No, it's just you.

Here are some relevant links.

The RFC in question (yes, there is one!):
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 - go to page 7

Posting styles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting

What Top-Posting Is (my favorite description):
http://blinkynet.net/comp/toppost.html

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location.
Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!


~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252142
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Josh Nathanson
Like you, I personally prefer the reply at the top, so I don't have to 
scroll down unless I need to review the OP.  Usually the subject line is 
enough to tell me what I'm reading about, so most of the time I don't need 
to review the OP, but I do always want to read the reply.  So, on the 
average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save the most 
scrolling time.

-- Josh



- Original Message - 
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:57 PM
Subject: OT: Replying after the message


I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
 sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a 
 message
 damn annoying?!

 No fingers at anyone just a gripe.






 This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
 Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
 Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
 confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of 
 the
 intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please 
 note
 that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
 information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
 received this communication in error please return it to the sender or 
 call
 our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within 
 this
 communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
 Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252145
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Jim Wright
Josh Nathanson wrote:
 So, on the average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save the 
 most 
scrolling time.

Of course, there won't be much scrolling if the person replying has 
properly trimmed the previous message to highlight the particular 
question or subject that they are responding to.

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252146
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Larry Lyons
Josh Nathanson wrote:
 So, on the average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save 
 the most 
scrolling time.

Of course, there won't be much scrolling if the person replying has 
properly trimmed the previous message to highlight the particular 
question or subject that they are responding to.

It would be even better if the person also didn't use HTML messages. On the web 
archive, when you only get the digest version or in my email client (I have 
html turned off) html mail frankly sucks. 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252150
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: OT: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
damn annoying?!

No. ;-) 

Personally, I think it *does* make more sense the way we read, to first read 
the text that the email is replying to. I find it more annoying the way Outlook 
just pastes the whole original message at the bottom, and I have to scroll down 
and read through it to figure out what the person was replying to (since it 
seems most people these days have lost the ability to TRIM the original 
message!) 

Mary Jo

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252157
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


RE: Replying after the message

2006-09-05 Thread Mark Henderson
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
 I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it 
 probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone 
 else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!

Then Dave Watts responded
 No, it's just you.

I totally agree with Dave but that is just my opinion of course. In
fact, if you happen to be on either the WDD design or css-discuss lists
(and those struggling to learn css really should join) you'll get
politely scolded for top posting (and sometimes NOT so politely!).
Trimming of course certainly does help, and often leaving the entire
contents of the previous email intact, whether you bottom or top post,
makes readability difficult. 

Truly though, there really is no right or wrong answer on this one, it's
more a matter of preference. Microsoft's default has definitely made top
posting the *norm* however.

Here is an argument *for* top posting, though as already stated I'm
certainly not an advocate:
http://www.hawkwings.net/2005/10/03/shooting-yourself-in-the-foot-or-hea
d-one-round-in-the-bottom-vs-top-posting-war/

Mark


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by ISPNZ's automated virus detection system,
and is believed to be clean.


~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:252169
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4