Re: cfargument and dot notaion
Yes, yes I understand. I meant CFFunction, not CFCs per se.
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
It's not CFCs per se, but cffunction. So it applies to tag based UDFs as
well - don't forget cffunction can be used outside of CFCs.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> That's what I thought. Oh well then.
>
> Good thing that CFCs don't behave this way.
> - Original Message -
> From: Raymond Camden
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:08 PM
> Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> No, because in script based UDFs, if you list them, they
> are required.
> If you want to use optional args in script based UDFs, you
> can't have
> them between the parens.
>
>
> ==
> =
> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:02 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > No...
> >
> > I mean that in a UDF such as:
> >
> > function HopeThisWorks (arg1, arg2, arg3) {
> >
> >
> > ..is specifying the arguments enough to initialize the
> > corresponding variables?
> >
> > In other words, after creating said UDF, would the call
> > HopeThisWorks(arg3="CrossFingers") be enough, without
> > paraming the other arguments within the UDF's body? Or would
> > the UDF crash and burn if the arguments were not paramed
> > somehow within the UDF's body?
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Raymond Camden
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 AM
> > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > You mean how do dynamically pass crap to a UDF? Like
> > attributeCollection
> > in custom tags? Use argumentCollection:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That should work.
> >
> >
> > ==
> > =
> > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
> >
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> >
> > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> >
> > > -Original Message-----
> > > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:34 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
> > >
> > >
> > > How do we param out arguments in a UDF then?
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Raymond Camden
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:12 PM
> > > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags.
> > >
> > > Unless...
> > >
> > > You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/
> > > UDFs as well:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ==
> > > =
> > > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
> > >
> > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> > >
RE: cfargument and dot notaion
It's not CFCs per se, but cffunction. So it applies to tag based UDFs as
well - don't forget cffunction can be used outside of CFCs.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> That's what I thought. Oh well then.
>
> Good thing that CFCs don't behave this way.
> - Original Message -
> From: Raymond Camden
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:08 PM
> Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> No, because in script based UDFs, if you list them, they
> are required.
> If you want to use optional args in script based UDFs, you
> can't have
> them between the parens.
>
>
> ==
> =
> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:02 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > No...
> >
> > I mean that in a UDF such as:
> >
> > function HopeThisWorks (arg1, arg2, arg3) {
> >
> >
> > ..is specifying the arguments enough to initialize the
> > corresponding variables?
> >
> > In other words, after creating said UDF, would the call
> > HopeThisWorks(arg3="CrossFingers") be enough, without
> > paraming the other arguments within the UDF's body? Or would
> > the UDF crash and burn if the arguments were not paramed
> > somehow within the UDF's body?
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Raymond Camden
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 AM
> > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > You mean how do dynamically pass crap to a UDF? Like
> > attributeCollection
> > in custom tags? Use argumentCollection:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That should work.
> >
> >
> > ==
> > =====
> > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
> >
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> >
> > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:34 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
> > >
> > >
> > > How do we param out arguments in a UDF then?
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Raymond Camden
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:12 PM
> > > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags.
> > >
> > > Unless...
> > >
> > > You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/
> > > UDFs as well:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ==
> > > =
> > > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
> > >
> > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> > >
> > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 PM
> > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > Subject: cfargument and dot notaion
> > > >
Re: cfargument and dot notaion
That's what I thought. Oh well then.
Good thing that CFCs don't behave this way.
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
No, because in script based UDFs, if you list them, they are required.
If you want to use optional args in script based UDFs, you can't have
them between the parens.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:02 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> No...
>
> I mean that in a UDF such as:
>
> function HopeThisWorks (arg1, arg2, arg3) {
>
>
> ..is specifying the arguments enough to initialize the
> corresponding variables?
>
> In other words, after creating said UDF, would the call
> HopeThisWorks(arg3="CrossFingers") be enough, without
> paraming the other arguments within the UDF's body? Or would
> the UDF crash and burn if the arguments were not paramed
> somehow within the UDF's body?
> - Original Message -
> From: Raymond Camden
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 AM
> Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> You mean how do dynamically pass crap to a UDF? Like
> attributeCollection
> in custom tags? Use argumentCollection:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That should work.
>
>
> ==
> =
> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:34 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > How do we param out arguments in a UDF then?
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Raymond Camden
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:12 PM
> > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags.
> >
> > Unless...
> >
> > You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/
> > UDFs as well:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ==
> > =
> > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
> >
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> >
> > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: cfargument and dot notaion
> > >
> > >
> > > When calling a cfc method using the dot notation, the
> > order of the
> > > arguments given to the method must match the order of
> > the cfargument
> > > tags in the body of the method, unlike cfinvoke, where
> > you have name
> > > value pairs.
> > >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > > > objEmailMan.isDupe(trim(singleAddress),emailCategoryID)>
> > >
> > > -- emailman.cfc --
> > >
> > > > type="string">
> > > > > type="numeric">
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this correct? It seems to be so, but I can't
> find anything
> > > anywhere that comes out and says it is the order
> that matters.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jon
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: cfargument and dot notaion
No, because in script based UDFs, if you list them, they are required.
If you want to use optional args in script based UDFs, you can't have
them between the parens.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:02 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> No...
>
> I mean that in a UDF such as:
>
> function HopeThisWorks (arg1, arg2, arg3) {
>
>
> ..is specifying the arguments enough to initialize the
> corresponding variables?
>
> In other words, after creating said UDF, would the call
> HopeThisWorks(arg3="CrossFingers") be enough, without
> paraming the other arguments within the UDF's body? Or would
> the UDF crash and burn if the arguments were not paramed
> somehow within the UDF's body?
> - Original Message -
> From: Raymond Camden
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 AM
> Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> You mean how do dynamically pass crap to a UDF? Like
> attributeCollection
> in custom tags? Use argumentCollection:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That should work.
>
>
> ==
> =
> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:34 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > How do we param out arguments in a UDF then?
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Raymond Camden
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:12 PM
> > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags.
> >
> > Unless...
> >
> > You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/
> > UDFs as well:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ==
> > =
> > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
> >
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> >
> > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: cfargument and dot notaion
> > >
> > >
> > > When calling a cfc method using the dot notation, the
> > order of the
> > > arguments given to the method must match the order of
> > the cfargument
> > > tags in the body of the method, unlike cfinvoke, where
> > you have name
> > > value pairs.
> > >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > > > objEmailMan.isDupe(trim(singleAddress),emailCategoryID)>
> > >
> > > -- emailman.cfc --
> > >
> > > > type="string">
> > > > > type="numeric">
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this correct? It seems to be so, but I can't
> find anything
> > > anywhere that comes out and says it is the order
> that matters.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jon
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: cfargument and dot notaion
No...
I mean that in a UDF such as:
function HopeThisWorks (arg1, arg2, arg3) {
..is specifying the arguments enough to initialize the corresponding variables?
In other words, after creating said UDF, would the call
HopeThisWorks(arg3="CrossFingers") be enough, without paraming the other arguments
within the UDF's body? Or would the UDF crash and burn if the arguments were not
paramed somehow within the UDF's body?
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
You mean how do dynamically pass crap to a UDF? Like attributeCollection
in custom tags? Use argumentCollection:
That should work.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:34 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> How do we param out arguments in a UDF then?
> - Original Message -
> From: Raymond Camden
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:12 PM
> Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion
>
>
> Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags.
>
> Unless...
>
> You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/
> UDFs as well:
>
>
>
>
> ==
> =
> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: cfargument and dot notaion
> >
> >
> > When calling a cfc method using the dot notation, the
> order of the
> > arguments given to the method must match the order of
> the cfargument
> > tags in the body of the method, unlike cfinvoke, where
> you have name
> > value pairs.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > > objEmailMan.isDupe(trim(singleAddress),emailCategoryID)>
> >
> > -- emailman.cfc --
> >
> >type="string">
> > > type="numeric">
> >
> >
> > Is this correct? It seems to be so, but I can't find anything
> > anywhere that comes out and says it is the order that matters.
> >
> > --
> > Jon
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: cfargument and dot notaion
You mean how do dynamically pass crap to a UDF? Like attributeCollection in custom tags? Use argumentCollection: That should work. === Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -Original Message- > From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:34 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: cfargument and dot notaion > > > How do we param out arguments in a UDF then? > - Original Message - > From: Raymond Camden > To: CF-Talk > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:12 PM > Subject: RE: cfargument and dot notaion > > > Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags. > > Unless... > > You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/ > UDFs as well: > > > > > == > = > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: cfargument and dot notaion > > > > > > When calling a cfc method using the dot notation, the > order of the > > arguments given to the method must match the order of > the cfargument > > tags in the body of the method, unlike cfinvoke, where > you have name > > value pairs. > > > > Example: > > > > > objEmailMan.isDupe(trim(singleAddress),emailCategoryID)> > > > > -- emailman.cfc -- > > > >type="string"> > > > type="numeric"> > > > > > > Is this correct? It seems to be so, but I can't find anything > > anywhere that comes out and says it is the order that matters. > > > > -- > > Jon > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: cfargument and dot notaion
Yes, the order of args must match the order of cfarg tags. Unless... You use the new name/value pair notation, which works w/ UDFs as well: === Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -Original Message- > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: cfargument and dot notaion > > > When calling a cfc method using the dot notation, the order of the > arguments given to the method must match the order of the cfargument > tags in the body of the method, unlike cfinvoke, where you have name > value pairs. > > Example: > >objEmailMan.isDupe(trim(singleAddress),emailCategoryID)> > > -- emailman.cfc -- > > >type="numeric"> > > > Is this correct? It seems to be so, but I can't find anything > anywhere that comes out and says it is the order that matters. > > -- > Jon > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
cfargument and dot notaion
When calling a cfc method using the dot notation, the order of the arguments given to the method must match the order of the cfargument tags in the body of the method, unlike cfinvoke, where you have name value pairs. Example: -- emailman.cfc -- Is this correct? It seems to be so, but I can't find anything anywhere that comes out and says it is the order that matters. -- Jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
